I have been a NRA member for over forty years. Forty of those years I have been a voting member, for the board of directors, which determines the direction of the organization. IF the NRA had drifted off course over that amount of time, the "majority" sited in each of these articles, would have ceased to be members of the NRA, which has clearly not happened.

I keep seeing liberals and their entwined liberal media stating exactly what you had said, that the majority of the NRA membership felt they could accept more limitations on their RIGHT to own firearms. Does is make sense that NRA membership would continue to grow, and people would cheerfully send their yearly dues in to the NRA if the members thought the NRA was moving in the wrong direction, or was being unreasonable.. I think not.

There is no pleasing the libs, as 'reasonable' to them effectively means send all of the firearms to the shredder.

I'm pretty sure if you did a poll with all of your Canon buddies as to what new features should be included in the next Nikon, it would turn out to be very similar to the articles you linked to. A majority of photographers believe Nikon should build a larger, heavier camera with a slower processor, and do away with those extra megapixels that aren't needed. Yeah, Six megapixel would be about right.

Again, Clearly, you don’t know what you are talking about. There is nothing ambiguous in the wording of the Second Amendment, or the commitment of the NRA in helping to secure that right.

I'm done with this conversation, as the definition of insanity is being tested here, as trying to talk nicely to a lib and expect a different outcome never works.