Full manual vs no manual poll
May 23, 2018 01:43:26 #
"The Counting"?
Joseph Stalin once said:
"It's not the ones that cast the votes that matter; it's the ons that count the votes that matter".
Joseph Stalin once said:
"It's not the ones that cast the votes that matter; it's the ons that count the votes that matter".
May 23, 2018 02:51:18 #
rmacilroy
Loc: pompano beach, fl
this is a laugh full maual alwways pross get lazy use auto foget the light thats the truth
May 25, 2018 23:13:58 #
May 26, 2018 10:29:52 #
May 26, 2018 14:20:26 #
May 26, 2018 14:54:34 #
cameraf4 wrote:
Still don't really know what this "proves" anyway. Interesting exercise? Waste of time?
I agree, that it is a waste of time for me, but it maybe very beneficial for the op and others.
Doesn’t matter whether the exposer is spot on, underexposed or overexposed slightly, it isn’t going to help anyone with the subject matter or composition.
A perfectly exposed snapshot is still a snapshot.
As far as proving anything, looking at most photos on this site or any other site for that matter, proves that using manual is not going to improve anyone’s photo skills.
Unfortunately, so many old timers think that they are good photographers just because they manually adjust the exposer. If you ask me, like the rest of us, couldn’t take a decent photo if their life depended on it.
May 26, 2018 19:34:09 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.