Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
HDR Photography -- Before and After
Landscape and trees
Jul 21, 2012 01:00:25   #
RaydancePhoto
 
HDR in camera using a Sony a57 and 50 1.4 hand held shots. Both shots are 'dreamy' but I like the non HDR better

Normal shot
Normal shot...

In camera HDR with sony a57
In camera HDR with sony a57...

Reply
Jul 21, 2012 02:58:08   #
woodsmitty Loc: Bruderheim, Alberta Canada
 
I agree, some pics just don't seem suited to HDR but being a nubie I don't know why. Darn nice photo though.

Reply
Jul 24, 2012 17:31:44   #
bull drink water Loc: pontiac mi.
 
woodsmitty wrote:
I agree, some pics just don't seem suited to HDR but being a nubie I don't know why. Darn nice photo though.


i'm with you, the in-camera hdr except on the lowest level,gives the halo effect.i seem to do better with 3 or 5 shot photo merging.even then i do best when i tone things down a bit.i'll post some soon. i think the best solution will be a sensor that is the same as the human eye.i hope we don't have to wait too long.

Reply
 
 
Jul 26, 2012 00:37:11   #
glojo Loc: South Devon, England
 
Could there be a slight movement or tremor between the two images and during blending they now appear very slightly blurred or out of focus?

Reply
Jul 26, 2012 02:52:08   #
conkerwood
 
Agree that the first shot is better. One of the things that HDR does is bring out details that you may sometimes not want to be quite so dominant. In the first shot, because of the DOF the foreground is out of focus, your eye is drawn towards the subject. In the HDR because the details are enhanced in the out of focus area they tend to become a distraction from the subject and in fact the whole pic tends to flatten. Not all pics work in HDR and I believe that the ones that are most effective are where the whole pic is acceptable focus. As soon as you HDR areas that are OOF it becomes far less effective.

Peter

Reply
Jul 26, 2012 03:06:21   #
glojo Loc: South Devon, England
 
conkerwood wrote:
Agree that the first shot is better. One of the things that HDR does is bring out details that you may sometimes not want to be quite so dominant. In the first shot, because of the DOF the foreground is out of focus, your eye is drawn towards the subject. In the HDR because the details are enhanced in the out of focus area they tend to become a distraction from the subject and in fact the whole pic tends to flatten. Not all pics work in HDR and I believe that the ones that are most effective are where the whole pic is acceptable focus. As soon as you HDR areas that are OOF it becomes far less effective.

Peter
Agree that the first shot is better. One of the th... (show quote)


What an informative reply,

Question
Could the aperture setting have possibly altered between the two shots?

I have read that the aperture should ALWAYS be constant to protect any depth of field issue, what are your thoughts on that please?

John

Reply
Jul 26, 2012 04:02:15   #
conkerwood
 
Yes the key setting in HDR is that the aperture must remain constant hence always shoot in aperture priority. I would always tend to go for as big a DOF as possible within the limits the situation allows.

Can't see how the camera could have changed apertures unless it was set on shutter priority. That way you would get three different depths of field. But looking at your pic I dont think that is the issue.

Hope this helps. I look forward to seeing more of your stuff.

Regards

Peter

Reply
 
 
Jul 26, 2012 08:21:47   #
gene58
 
RaydancePhoto wrote:
HDR in camera using a Sony a57 and 50 1.4 hand held shots. Both shots are 'dreamy' but I like the non HDR better


I use photomatix pro 4.2 gene benson.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
HDR Photography -- Before and After
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.