Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon vs. Sigma 24 1.4
May 13, 2018 13:35:55   #
rjandreoff Loc: Hawaii
 
Looking for some experience based, informed input.

I currently own a Nikon 24mm 1.4 G, which I purchased used about 3 years ago from B&H as a 10 on 10. Looks new. Absolutely love the lens. However, on a recent extended trip to Italy it began to have problems. In short, it started mis-communicating with both of my camera bodies, and now will not autofocus. Performed every single troubleshooting exercise available (including direct input from Nikon support) -- no dice. Obviously not happy. This lens has been well cared for, with very little wear and tear. Nikon provided an estimate for repair -- $600 +/-, includes 6 month warranty on that repair. I have NO experience with Nikon repairing lenses.

So it's decision time. Repair the Nikon OR consider a new Sigma ART 24 mm 1.4. The reviews on that lens have been very good, virtually on par with the Nikon. PLUS 4 year warranty.

Thanks everyone.

Reply
May 13, 2018 14:07:45   #
Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, Colorado
 
rjandreoff wrote:
Looking for some experience based, informed input.

I currently own a Nikon 24mm 1.4 G, which I purchased used about 3 years ago from B&H as a 10 on 10. Looks new. Absolutely love the lens. However, on a recent extended trip to Italy it began to have problems. In short, it started mis-communicating with both of my camera bodies, and now will not autofocus. Performed every single troubleshooting exercise available (including direct input from Nikon support) -- no dice. Obviously not happy. This lens has been well cared for, with very little wear and tear. Nikon provided an estimate for repair -- $600 +/-, includes 6 month warranty on that repair. I have NO experience with Nikon repairing lenses.

So it's decision time. Repair the Nikon OR consider a new Sigma ART 24 mm 1.4. The reviews on that lens have been very good, virtually on par with the Nikon. PLUS 4 year warranty.

Thanks everyone.
Looking for some experience based, informed input.... (show quote)


For me, it would be the Sigma. The reviews are as you say, excellent.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/SIGMA-24mm-F-1-4-Art-DG-Lens-for-Nikon/332649024043?hash=item4d736d4a2b:g:2CkAAOSw8e5a9cly

Reply
May 13, 2018 14:19:46   #
rjandreoff Loc: Hawaii
 
Thanks for your input. I am tending that way as well.

Reply
 
 
May 14, 2018 06:43:13   #
The Villages Loc: The Villages, Florida
 
Looks like the Nikon version is about twice that of the Sigma. Certainly worth trying.

The only possible negative with a 3rd party lens is the communication with the camera. Nikon doesn't always share their technical data for 3rd parties to make use of.

Reply
May 14, 2018 07:53:04   #
Cotondog Loc: Saskatchewan, Canada
 
I do not shoot with a Nikon camera, but I do own the Sigma 24mm Art lens that I use on my Canon 6D FF. Absolutely love the lens. I do not think you will be disappointed.

Reply
May 14, 2018 09:21:32   #
jeryh Loc: Oxfordshire UK
 
I got the sigma 24 F1.4, and my first shot with it, I won an award for a calendar; brilliant lens, superb for just about anything !

Reply
May 14, 2018 12:21:54   #
warenka
 
Before doing anything I suggest you clean the metal contacts on lenses and
cameras with alcohol. Do not use rubbing alcohol as that contains an oil.
I had your problem at one time and it worked. I now do it on a regular basis.
No harm in trying it.
W.

Reply
 
 
May 14, 2018 12:34:11   #
Rich1939 Loc: Pike County Penna.
 
rjandreoff wrote:
Looking for some experience based, informed input.

I currently own a Nikon 24mm 1.4 G, which I purchased used about 3 years ago from B&H as a 10 on 10. Looks new. Absolutely love the lens. However, on a recent extended trip to Italy it began to have problems. In short, it started mis-communicating with both of my camera bodies, and now will not autofocus. Performed every single troubleshooting exercise available (including direct input from Nikon support) -- no dice. Obviously not happy. This lens has been well cared for, with very little wear and tear. Nikon provided an estimate for repair -- $600 +/-, includes 6 month warranty on that repair. I have NO experience with Nikon repairing lenses.

So it's decision time. Repair the Nikon OR consider a new Sigma ART 24 mm 1.4. The reviews on that lens have been very good, virtually on par with the Nikon. PLUS 4 year warranty.

Thanks everyone.
Looking for some experience based, informed input.... (show quote)


Unless 'GAS' is part of the equation I would ask myself if I was happy with the IQ of the lens before it developed AF problems if I was the next thing I would consider is the cost difference between an "estimate" of $600 and the price of the Sigma, currently $750 +tax. Nikon service in Melville NY often beats the estimate and will advise you before proceeding if the repair will be higher at which point you could decline the repair and then buy the other. I don't know about other Nikon repair locations but I would be surprised if the policies are different.

Reply
May 14, 2018 14:55:31   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
I'd stick with the Nikon lens. Having attended a seminar, which revealed some of the science behind making Nikkor lenses, no one else compares.
--Bob
rjandreoff wrote:
Looking for some experience based, informed input.

I currently own a Nikon 24mm 1.4 G, which I purchased used about 3 years ago from B&H as a 10 on 10. Looks new. Absolutely love the lens. However, on a recent extended trip to Italy it began to have problems. In short, it started mis-communicating with both of my camera bodies, and now will not autofocus. Performed every single troubleshooting exercise available (including direct input from Nikon support) -- no dice. Obviously not happy. This lens has been well cared for, with very little wear and tear. Nikon provided an estimate for repair -- $600 +/-, includes 6 month warranty on that repair. I have NO experience with Nikon repairing lenses.

So it's decision time. Repair the Nikon OR consider a new Sigma ART 24 mm 1.4. The reviews on that lens have been very good, virtually on par with the Nikon. PLUS 4 year warranty.

Thanks everyone.
Looking for some experience based, informed input.... (show quote)

Reply
May 14, 2018 16:36:42   #
Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida
 
rmalarz wrote:
I'd stick with the Nikon lens. Having attended a seminar, which revealed some of the science behind making Nikkor lenses, no one else compares.
--Bob


I have been tempted by the Sigma Art lenses; but, to date, have always stuck with Nikon..
No seminar needed.

Reply
May 14, 2018 17:23:58   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
rjandreoff wrote:
Looking for some experience based, informed input.

I currently own a Nikon 24mm 1.4 G, which I purchased used about 3 years ago from B&H as a 10 on 10. Looks new. Absolutely love the lens. However, on a recent extended trip to Italy it began to have problems. In short, it started mis-communicating with both of my camera bodies, and now will not autofocus. Performed every single troubleshooting exercise available (including direct input from Nikon support) -- no dice. Obviously not happy. This lens has been well cared for, with very little wear and tear. Nikon provided an estimate for repair -- $600 +/-, includes 6 month warranty on that repair. I have NO experience with Nikon repairing lenses.

So it's decision time. Repair the Nikon OR consider a new Sigma ART 24 mm 1.4. The reviews on that lens have been very good, virtually on par with the Nikon. PLUS 4 year warranty.

Thanks everyone.
Looking for some experience based, informed input.... (show quote)

Nikon has a 5 year warranty.

Reply
 
 
May 14, 2018 18:00:53   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
I've always stuck with Nikkors for my Nikon cameras. The seminar was for lighting, but the lenses and their recipes were discussed to some degree. After that lecture, I'm glad I stuck with Nikkor lenses. The seminar only served to convince me I'd made the right decision.
--Bob
Kmgw9v wrote:
I have been tempted by the Sigma Art lenses; but, to date, have always stuck with Nikon..
No seminar needed.

Reply
May 15, 2018 00:52:27   #
ToBoldlyGo Loc: London U.K.
 
billnikon wrote:
Nikon has a 5 year warranty.


He also bought the lens used from B&H, as in the original post.

Reply
May 15, 2018 07:09:40   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
ToBoldlyGo wrote:
He also bought the lens used from B&H, as in the original post.


Yes, I read his original post. NOW, he is considering a new Sigma that has a 4 year warranty, I was reminding him that a NEW Nikon would come with a 5 year warranty. YES, I AM AWARE THAT USED LENSES FROM B&H DO NOT COME WITH A LONG TERM WARRANTY.

Reply
May 15, 2018 07:17:36   #
ToBoldlyGo Loc: London U.K.
 
billnikon wrote:
Yes, I read his original post. NOW, he is considering a new Sigma that has a 4 year warranty, I was reminding him that a NEW Nikon would come with a 5 year warranty. YES, I AM AWARE THAT USED LENSES FROM B&H DO NOT COME WITH A LONG TERM WARRANTY.


No need for caps. Please keep it civil. I took your post as in suggesting his Nikon lens was still under warranty.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.