Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Analysis
Sunset problem
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
May 8, 2018 11:36:19   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
UTMike wrote:
Never wrong with me!

Reply
May 8, 2018 12:05:44   #
kpmac Loc: Ragley, La
 
Well, Mike, I'm glad I followed this thread. Hope to do some late evening landscapes on my upcoming trip to Yellowstone.

Reply
May 8, 2018 12:09:04   #
UTMike Loc: South Jordan, UT
 
kpmac wrote:
Well, Mike, I'm glad I followed this thread. Hope to do some late evening landscapes on my upcoming trip to Yellowstone.


Hope you do better than I did. Not many macro shots in Yellowstone.

Reply
 
 
May 8, 2018 14:10:34   #
JimKing Loc: Salisbury, Maryland USA
 
Thanks for the nice comments. Here is another quick response that really is quick.
I've had very good luck getting stars from highlights at f/11. Saves going all the way to f/16 or f/22.

Reply
May 8, 2018 15:57:00   #
UTMike Loc: South Jordan, UT
 
JimKing wrote:
Thanks for the nice comments. Here is another quick response that really is quick.
I've had very good luck getting stars from highlights at f/11. Saves going all the way to f/16 or f/22.


Thanks for yet another good tip!

Reply
May 8, 2018 16:40:59   #
JimKing Loc: Salisbury, Maryland USA
 
I looked back on a favorite star photo of mine and was surprised that it was shot at f/9.



Reply
May 8, 2018 16:58:19   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
JimKing wrote:
I looked back on a favorite star photo of mine and was surprised that it was shot at f/9.


What a fun shot; love it!

Reply
 
 
May 8, 2018 21:17:29   #
UTMike Loc: South Jordan, UT
 
JimKing wrote:
I looked back on a favorite star photo of mine and was surprised that it was shot at f/9.


A real beauty Jim. I have some I shot tonight that I will share tomorrow. I think I have an improvement.

Reply
May 9, 2018 07:08:55   #
nimbushopper Loc: Tampa, FL
 
Linda's advice was right on. If you are looking for a starburst effect then purchase a starburst filter and use it for that purpose.

Reply
May 9, 2018 08:06:19   #
UTMike Loc: South Jordan, UT
 
nimbushopper wrote:
Linda's advice was right on. If you are looking for a starburst effect then purchase a starburst filter and use it for that purpose.


NB, thanks for commenting. I will post my latest sunset effort soon. It is better. LOL.

Reply
May 9, 2018 09:14:47   #
DaveC1 Loc: South East US
 
With sunsets I prefer to shoot aperture (f8 or f11 no more) priority and let the camera set exposure (and ISO) on the actual sun disc in spot mode. And yes for starburst effect use a filter.

Reply
 
 
May 9, 2018 09:16:29   #
Bobcat87
 
As a learner, I really benefited from this discussion. I also enjoy reading the initial problem posed and trying to "solve" it before seeing the responses. So much good info in a friendly context!

Reply
May 9, 2018 09:28:54   #
dbfalconer Loc: Salida CO
 
JimKing wrote:
Just a quick comment on aperture that has been alluded to. Beginning photographers learn that a smaller aperture (larger number) creates an image with more in focus. This is frequently translated, at least in the minds of beginning photographers as the smaller the aperture (again larger number) the sharper the image. More distances in focus is not the same as "sharper image". Forgetting, for the moment, the range of distances that are in focus, both larger and smaller apertures cause unsharpness. Larger apertures use the more of the lens glass closer to the edges of the lens which because of the physics is not as sharp as the central area. Also when light passes the sharp edge of the aperture blades a portion of that light is refracted or bent which reduces focus. Since a very small aperture has proportionally more edge the image becomes less sharp. (Wow, this is getting wordy) The short ending...both very small and very large apertures create less sharpness and staying near the center aperture numbers creates the sharpest image. Yes, there are very good reasons for using both very large and very small apertures but it requires compromising sharpness.
Just a quick comment on aperture that has been all... (show quote)


Good explanation and very helpful. May explain some of my problems! Thanks.

Reply
May 9, 2018 09:34:37   #
camerapapi Loc: Miami, Fl.
 
Well, Linda noticed your super high ISO setting for that shot. Useless to say that a lower ISO setting, like ISO 200 or 400 would have been ideal to control noise in the dark areas.
I consider a big mistake using Auto WB for many shots but especially for sunrise or sunsets. If shooting RAW it makes no difference because WB can be easily changed during editing but if using JPEG it does make quite a difference. The results would have been a mixed one regarding colors, perhaps pleasant but perhaps not. I tend to warm my sunsets and usually set WB to 6000 degrees Kelvin. Some cameras, like my Olympus, have a SUNSET preset for when shooting JPEG images. It works to my entire satisfaction.
By the way, the horizon in your image needs to be level.

Reply
May 9, 2018 10:18:26   #
Toby
 
lsimpkins wrote:
The exif data from the photo shows ISO of 20000. Not surprising it looks a little noisy. A more moderate aperture (maybe f8) would have permitted a lower ISO value resulting in less noise in the image. You also could have used a much slower shutter speed - why 1/2500 for a static scene such as this?

Sorry Linda - I see you covered the same issues while I was typing.


WOW

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Analysis
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.