I currently have a Nikon D90, but would like to upgrade and possibly do a bit of photography work. I am very interested in portrait photgraphy, but also love landscapes and seascapes. I basically never shoot sports, though.
I'm looking for advice on whether to go with the D700 or D800 and why you make that recommendation. If possible, would like to see similar shots you have taken with D700, D800, and D90.
Also, I am looking at purchasing a 24-70 2.8 Tamron lens. Would you consider this the best all-around lens for my purposes?
Though money is not in limitless supply, I do want some good equipment, so a difference of $800-900 between two cameras is not a good enough reason for me to purchase the cheaper one. However, a difference of $1000-2000 will definitely make a difference. So, yes, my upper limit on the body is $3000.
Thanks!
Lou Ellen
Get the best you can afford and learn how to use it. A good camera does not make for a good photographer.
LouEllen wrote:
I currently have a Nikon D90, but would like to upgrade and possibly do a bit of photography work. I am very interested in portrait photgraphy, but also love landscapes and seascapes. I basically never shoot sports, though.
I'm looking for advice on whether to go with the D700 or D800 and why you make that recommendation. If possible, would like to see similar shots you have taken with D700, D800, and D90.
Also, I am looking at purchasing a 24-70 2.8 Tamron lens. Would you consider this the best all-around lens for my purposes?
Though money is not in limitless supply, I do want some good equipment, so a difference of $800-900 between two cameras is not a good enough reason for me to purchase the cheaper one. However, a difference of $1000-2000 will definitely make a difference. So, yes, my upper limit on the body is $3000.
Thanks!
Lou Ellen
I currently have a Nikon D90, but would like to up... (
show quote)
Buying new equipment is always a big step. I like to get opinions and read reviews.
Camera Reviews
http://www.kenrockwell.comhttp://www.dpreview.comhttp://www.snapsort.comhttp://www.whatdigitalcamera.com/equipment.htmlLens Reviews
http://kenrockwell.comhttp://photozone.de/http://dpreview.comInfo:
http://photonotes.org/articles/beginner-faq/lenses.html
Why not the D7000 for around $1200.. Will leave another $1800 for Nikon Lens that hold their value. If money is not an issue stay with the better glass and not some other brand lens. Yes you save money in the beginning but not when and if you resale. Here's a few samples of the D7000
LouEllen wrote:
I currently have a Nikon D90, but would like to upgrade and possibly do a bit of photography work. I am very interested in portrait photgraphy, but also love landscapes and seascapes. I basically never shoot sports, though.
I'm looking for advice on whether to go with the D700 or D800 and why you make that recommendation. If possible, would like to see similar shots you have taken with D700, D800, and D90.
Also, I am looking at purchasing a 24-70 2.8 Tamron lens. Would you consider this the best all-around lens for my purposes?
Though money is not in limitless supply, I do want some good equipment, so a difference of $800-900 between two cameras is not a good enough reason for me to purchase the cheaper one. However, a difference of $1000-2000 will definitely make a difference. So, yes, my upper limit on the body is $3000.
Thanks!
Lou Ellen
I currently have a Nikon D90, but would like to up... (
show quote)
LouEllen wrote:
I currently have a Nikon D90, but would like to upgrade and possibly do a bit of photography work. I am very interested in portrait photgraphy, but also love landscapes and seascapes. I basically never shoot sports, though.
I'm looking for advice on whether to go with the D700 or D800 and why you make that recommendation. If possible, would like to see similar shots you have taken with D700, D800, and D90.
Also, I am looking at purchasing a 24-70 2.8 Tamron lens. Would you consider this the best all-around lens for my purposes?
Though money is not in limitless supply, I do want some good equipment, so a difference of $800-900 between two cameras is not a good enough reason for me to purchase the cheaper one. However, a difference of $1000-2000 will definitely make a difference. So, yes, my upper limit on the body is $3000.
Thanks!
Lou Ellen
I currently have a Nikon D90, but would like to up... (
show quote)
For lens, definitely the nano crystal coated Nikon 24-70 G AFS lens. For camera body, the D800 or D800e for sure!
Nic42
Loc: Cardiff, Wales
I would hang-fire on a D700 as Nikon are expected to announce the D600 FX in a few months. Look at the specs when they are published as they are likely to improve on the D700
A couple of really pretty shots . . . thanks for sharing.
[quote=fstop22]Why not the D7000 for around $1200.. Will leave another $1800 for Nikon Lens that hold their value. If money is not an issue stay with the better glass and not some other brand lens. Yes you save money in the beginning but not when and if you resale. Here's a few samples of the [quote=fstop22]
Really nice photos fstop22. I viewed the Exif data but didn't find the what lens you used on the bird and girl. ?
fstop22 wrote:
Why not the D7000 for around $1200.. Will leave another $1800 for Nikon Lens that hold their value. If money is not an issue stay with the better glass and not some other brand lens. Yes you save money in the beginning but not when and if you resale. Here's a few samples of the D7000
LouEllen wrote:
I currently have a Nikon D90, but would like to upgrade and possibly do a bit of photography work. I am very interested in portrait photgraphy, but also love landscapes and seascapes. I basically never shoot sports, though.
I'm looking for advice on whether to go with the D700 or D800 and why you make that recommendation. If possible, would like to see similar shots you have taken with D700, D800, and D90.
Also, I am looking at purchasing a 24-70 2.8 Tamron lens. Would you consider this the best all-around lens for my purposes?
Though money is not in limitless supply, I do want some good equipment, so a difference of $800-900 between two cameras is not a good enough reason for me to purchase the cheaper one. However, a difference of $1000-2000 will definitely make a difference. So, yes, my upper limit on the body is $3000.
Thanks!
Lou Ellen
I currently have a Nikon D90, but would like to up... (
show quote)
Why not the D7000 for around $1200.. Will leave an... (
show quote)
Definitely agree . . . lenses are an investment that will live through many changes in camera bodies. Most photographers are limited in the quality they can produce because of second rate glass. I would rather have a D90 with Nikon's best glass, than a D800 with lesser glass.
aammatj
Loc: Zebulon, NC / Roscoe, Ill
I have a D700 and a D800. Both are great cameras but the D800 is definitely worth the extra $. Gives you much more ability to crop and still have sharp images.
I opted out in getting the 7000 and got the 5100. When I compare the shots to my D70, what a big difference. Then when I look at the quality of the 7000 I want to kick myself for not paying the extra, although all I could find was a refurbished and not new. For some reason, no one had the 7000. Now I am just waiting for the end of the year to see what comes around. I am not going to make the same mistake twice.
At the time I purchased my 5100 I tried Amazon as well as Berger Brothers and 52nd St Photo. I also tried Nikon directly and they said they were out of stock. I know that it readily available now, but as I mentioned, I will wait until end of year. Thank you for your input.
Your photos are wonderful! I can appreciate what you are saying. For now, I plan to upgrade to a better lens. Will probably wait to see what/if/when the D600 is released. If not a D600, then I will have to decide which camera to purchase. I should have explained in my original post - I don't actually want to replace my D90 as much as add an ADDITIONAL body. And, if adding, why not better?
Lou Ellen
Why not the D7000 for around $1200.. Will leave another $1800 for Nikon Lens that hold their value. If money is not an issue stay with the better glass and not some other brand lens. Yes you save money in the beginning but not when and if you resale. Here's a few samples of the D7000
LouEllen wrote:
I currently have a Nikon D90, but would like to upgrade and possibly do a bit of photography work. I am very interested in portrait photgraphy, but also love landscapes and seascapes. I basically never shoot sports, though.
I'm looking for advice on whether to go with the D700 or D800 and why you make that recommendation. If possible, would like to see similar shots you have taken with D700, D800, and D90.
Also, I am looking at purchasing a 24-70 2.8 Tamron lens. Would you consider this the best all-around lens for my purposes?
Though money is not in limitless supply, I do want some good equipment, so a difference of $800-900 between two cameras is not a good enough reason for me to purchase the cheaper one. However, a difference of $1000-2000 will definitely make a difference. So, yes, my upper limit on the body is $3000.
Thanks!
Lou Ellen
I currently have a Nikon D90, but would like to up... (
show quote)
[/quote]
Thanks to all for your input. After reading this thread and doing some more research, I have decided to purchase a better lens and wait a while on the camera. However, since I do want an additional body, I don't want to wait too long. Hopefully, that D600 will be announced shortly and I can decide what to get.
Lou Ellen
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.