Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out The Pampered Pets Corner section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon upgrade- 700? 800?
Page 1 of 2 next>
Jul 19, 2012 17:34:17   #
LouEllen
 
I currently have a Nikon D90, but would like to upgrade and possibly do a bit of photography work. I am very interested in portrait photgraphy, but also love landscapes and seascapes. I basically never shoot sports, though.

I'm looking for advice on whether to go with the D700 or D800 and why you make that recommendation. If possible, would like to see similar shots you have taken with D700, D800, and D90.

Also, I am looking at purchasing a 24-70 2.8 Tamron lens. Would you consider this the best all-around lens for my purposes?

Though money is not in limitless supply, I do want some good equipment, so a difference of $800-900 between two cameras is not a good enough reason for me to purchase the cheaper one. However, a difference of $1000-2000 will definitely make a difference. So, yes, my upper limit on the body is $3000.

Thanks!

Lou Ellen

Reply
Jul 19, 2012 17:38:18   #
Acountry330 Loc: Dothan,Ala USA
 
Get the best you can afford and learn how to use it. A good camera does not make for a good photographer.

Reply
Jul 19, 2012 17:49:52   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
LouEllen wrote:
I currently have a Nikon D90, but would like to upgrade and possibly do a bit of photography work. I am very interested in portrait photgraphy, but also love landscapes and seascapes. I basically never shoot sports, though.

I'm looking for advice on whether to go with the D700 or D800 and why you make that recommendation. If possible, would like to see similar shots you have taken with D700, D800, and D90.

Also, I am looking at purchasing a 24-70 2.8 Tamron lens. Would you consider this the best all-around lens for my purposes?

Though money is not in limitless supply, I do want some good equipment, so a difference of $800-900 between two cameras is not a good enough reason for me to purchase the cheaper one. However, a difference of $1000-2000 will definitely make a difference. So, yes, my upper limit on the body is $3000.

Thanks!

Lou Ellen
I currently have a Nikon D90, but would like to up... (show quote)

Buying new equipment is always a big step. I like to get opinions and read reviews.

Camera Reviews
http://www.kenrockwell.com
http://www.dpreview.com
http://www.snapsort.com
http://www.whatdigitalcamera.com/equipment.html

Lens Reviews
http://kenrockwell.com
http://photozone.de/
http://dpreview.com

Info:
http://photonotes.org/articles/beginner-faq/lenses.html

Reply
Check out Bridge Camera Show Case section of our forum.
Jul 19, 2012 20:40:59   #
martinfisherphoto Loc: Lake Placid Florida
 
Why not the D7000 for around $1200.. Will leave another $1800 for Nikon Lens that hold their value. If money is not an issue stay with the better glass and not some other brand lens. Yes you save money in the beginning but not when and if you resale. Here's a few samples of the D7000
LouEllen wrote:
I currently have a Nikon D90, but would like to upgrade and possibly do a bit of photography work. I am very interested in portrait photgraphy, but also love landscapes and seascapes. I basically never shoot sports, though.

I'm looking for advice on whether to go with the D700 or D800 and why you make that recommendation. If possible, would like to see similar shots you have taken with D700, D800, and D90.

Also, I am looking at purchasing a 24-70 2.8 Tamron lens. Would you consider this the best all-around lens for my purposes?

Though money is not in limitless supply, I do want some good equipment, so a difference of $800-900 between two cameras is not a good enough reason for me to purchase the cheaper one. However, a difference of $1000-2000 will definitely make a difference. So, yes, my upper limit on the body is $3000.

Thanks!

Lou Ellen
I currently have a Nikon D90, but would like to up... (show quote)









Reply
Jul 19, 2012 21:04:00   #
ephraim Imperio
 
LouEllen wrote:
I currently have a Nikon D90, but would like to upgrade and possibly do a bit of photography work. I am very interested in portrait photgraphy, but also love landscapes and seascapes. I basically never shoot sports, though.

I'm looking for advice on whether to go with the D700 or D800 and why you make that recommendation. If possible, would like to see similar shots you have taken with D700, D800, and D90.

Also, I am looking at purchasing a 24-70 2.8 Tamron lens. Would you consider this the best all-around lens for my purposes?

Though money is not in limitless supply, I do want some good equipment, so a difference of $800-900 between two cameras is not a good enough reason for me to purchase the cheaper one. However, a difference of $1000-2000 will definitely make a difference. So, yes, my upper limit on the body is $3000.

Thanks!

Lou Ellen
I currently have a Nikon D90, but would like to up... (show quote)


For lens, definitely the nano crystal coated Nikon 24-70 G AFS lens. For camera body, the D800 or D800e for sure!

Reply
Jul 20, 2012 06:26:07   #
Nic42 Loc: Cardiff, Wales
 
I would hang-fire on a D700 as Nikon are expected to announce the D600 FX in a few months. Look at the specs when they are published as they are likely to improve on the D700

Reply
Jul 20, 2012 10:36:29   #
jerzee.shore.shooter
 
A couple of really pretty shots . . . thanks for sharing.

Reply
Check out Commercial and Industrial Photography section of our forum.
Jul 20, 2012 14:38:50   #
ecobin Loc: Paoli, PA
 
[quote=fstop22]Why not the D7000 for around $1200.. Will leave another $1800 for Nikon Lens that hold their value. If money is not an issue stay with the better glass and not some other brand lens. Yes you save money in the beginning but not when and if you resale. Here's a few samples of the [quote=fstop22]

Really nice photos fstop22. I viewed the Exif data but didn't find the what lens you used on the bird and girl. ?

Reply
Jul 20, 2012 15:16:34   #
Weddingguy Loc: British Columbia - Canada
 
fstop22 wrote:
Why not the D7000 for around $1200.. Will leave another $1800 for Nikon Lens that hold their value. If money is not an issue stay with the better glass and not some other brand lens. Yes you save money in the beginning but not when and if you resale. Here's a few samples of the D7000
LouEllen wrote:
I currently have a Nikon D90, but would like to upgrade and possibly do a bit of photography work. I am very interested in portrait photgraphy, but also love landscapes and seascapes. I basically never shoot sports, though.

I'm looking for advice on whether to go with the D700 or D800 and why you make that recommendation. If possible, would like to see similar shots you have taken with D700, D800, and D90.

Also, I am looking at purchasing a 24-70 2.8 Tamron lens. Would you consider this the best all-around lens for my purposes?

Though money is not in limitless supply, I do want some good equipment, so a difference of $800-900 between two cameras is not a good enough reason for me to purchase the cheaper one. However, a difference of $1000-2000 will definitely make a difference. So, yes, my upper limit on the body is $3000.

Thanks!

Lou Ellen
I currently have a Nikon D90, but would like to up... (show quote)
Why not the D7000 for around $1200.. Will leave an... (show quote)


Definitely agree . . . lenses are an investment that will live through many changes in camera bodies. Most photographers are limited in the quality they can produce because of second rate glass. I would rather have a D90 with Nikon's best glass, than a D800 with lesser glass.

Reply
Jul 21, 2012 11:57:59   #
aammatj Loc: Zebulon, NC / Roscoe, Ill
 
I have a D700 and a D800. Both are great cameras but the D800 is definitely worth the extra $. Gives you much more ability to crop and still have sharp images.

Reply
Jul 21, 2012 16:41:42   #
jjadeco25 Loc: Alma, AR
 
I opted out in getting the 7000 and got the 5100. When I compare the shots to my D70, what a big difference. Then when I look at the quality of the 7000 I want to kick myself for not paying the extra, although all I could find was a refurbished and not new. For some reason, no one had the 7000. Now I am just waiting for the end of the year to see what comes around. I am not going to make the same mistake twice.

Reply
Check out Bridge Camera Show Case section of our forum.
Jul 21, 2012 17:28:02   #
ephraim Imperio
 
jjadeco25 wrote:
I opted out in getting the 7000 and got the 5100. When I compare the shots to my D70, what a big difference. Then when I look at the quality of the 7000 I want to kick myself for not paying the extra, although all I could find was a refurbished and not new. For some reason, no one had the 7000. Now I am just waiting for the end of the year to see what comes around. I am not going to make the same mistake twice.


If you are still looking for a brand new D7000, it is available at Amazon.

http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-16-2MP-DX-Format-Digital-3-0-Inch/dp/B0042X9LC4/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1342905982&sr=1-1&keywords=d7000+nikon

Reply
Jul 21, 2012 18:09:37   #
jjadeco25 Loc: Alma, AR
 
At the time I purchased my 5100 I tried Amazon as well as Berger Brothers and 52nd St Photo. I also tried Nikon directly and they said they were out of stock. I know that it readily available now, but as I mentioned, I will wait until end of year. Thank you for your input.

Reply
Jul 22, 2012 13:29:23   #
LouEllen
 
Your photos are wonderful! I can appreciate what you are saying. For now, I plan to upgrade to a better lens. Will probably wait to see what/if/when the D600 is released. If not a D600, then I will have to decide which camera to purchase. I should have explained in my original post - I don't actually want to replace my D90 as much as add an ADDITIONAL body. And, if adding, why not better?

Lou Ellen

Why not the D7000 for around $1200.. Will leave another $1800 for Nikon Lens that hold their value. If money is not an issue stay with the better glass and not some other brand lens. Yes you save money in the beginning but not when and if you resale. Here's a few samples of the D7000
LouEllen wrote:
I currently have a Nikon D90, but would like to upgrade and possibly do a bit of photography work. I am very interested in portrait photgraphy, but also love landscapes and seascapes. I basically never shoot sports, though.

I'm looking for advice on whether to go with the D700 or D800 and why you make that recommendation. If possible, would like to see similar shots you have taken with D700, D800, and D90.

Also, I am looking at purchasing a 24-70 2.8 Tamron lens. Would you consider this the best all-around lens for my purposes?

Though money is not in limitless supply, I do want some good equipment, so a difference of $800-900 between two cameras is not a good enough reason for me to purchase the cheaper one. However, a difference of $1000-2000 will definitely make a difference. So, yes, my upper limit on the body is $3000.

Thanks!

Lou Ellen
I currently have a Nikon D90, but would like to up... (show quote)
[/quote]

Reply
Jul 22, 2012 13:31:39   #
LouEllen
 
Thanks to all for your input. After reading this thread and doing some more research, I have decided to purchase a better lens and wait a while on the camera. However, since I do want an additional body, I don't want to wait too long. Hopefully, that D600 will be announced shortly and I can decide what to get.

Lou Ellen

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.