pbradin wrote:
Much of the decision on which lens you use is base on a couple of things. I do racing photography at Daytona (Rolex 24) and the 12-hour race at Sebring. For shots on the banking at Daytona, I am shooting between 300-400mm on a crop sensor Canon 7D II. But on infield shots I use a 70-200 f2.8. A warning. The longer the lens, the shallower the depth of field, so you may need to stop down a little on your f-stop to get all of what you want in focus. Be prepared to crank up the ISO a bit. I usually pan my infield shots at at about 1/250th second. With the IS set on "mode 2" (panning mode), I can get clean shots, but the rotation of the wheels and the background are blurred, showing the "speed". Individual lenses will require different settings. I would take both lenses and be prepared to use each one, depending on how far you are from the action. Also, you may want to get a large part of the field on the first lap and then shift to shooting individual riders, even face and body close-ups which would require the longer lens. "Jump" shots can be a lot of fun, but get the hill in the shot, too, to help "tell the story" of what is actually happening. A motorcycle against a blue sky is kind of boring. Make sure you have a camera bag to keep your second lens in and some microfiber cloths with you (I buy mine in the automotive department at Walmart or Target. I am cheap) I carry about half a dozen with me to a race. Many people say they use a monopod, but I cannot move the camera fast enough with one attached to the camera or lens. I do everything free-hand. Try lots of different angles, coming right at you, panning as the go by you, although I am almost always getting a sort of front view as they get close. Pure side shots are harder to capture and keep sharp. remember, motocross is done on dirt and so their will be a lot of dirt flying around. Be prepared.
Much of the decision on which lens you use is base... (
show quote)
That’s a funny looking motocross bike.