I’m Looking For The Mirrorless Cameras..., Were Are They?!?!
Apr 21, 2018 10:14:56 #
SharpShooter wrote:
That’s right guys, I’m looking for all those mirro... (show quote)
Last time I was at Laguna Seca was 1964. Did not see any mirrorless then either.
I was doing Basic Training and other training in the military. My MOS was Light and Heavy Truck and Equipment Training, and we used to race Jeep, Deuce N a Half, and 5 ton Trucks on the Laguna Seca race track. No spectators.... No camera's.
By the way...... Nothing "sissy" or "puss" about 4:3. Pro's are now using them, just apparently not for "bicycle" races. Now that's...........
Apr 21, 2018 10:19:50 #
davyboy
Loc: Anoka Mn.
SharpShooter wrote:
Eve, I think you’re right!
I believe there was a golf match going on too!!! LoL
SS
I believe there was a golf match going on too!!! LoL
SS
They are so small you didn’t see them that’s all🙃
Apr 21, 2018 10:20:20 #
They are coming not ready for the pros yet.
When they are pros will migrate to them as replacements won’t be a mad rush to switch they won’t take better photographs
When they are pros will migrate to them as replacements won’t be a mad rush to switch they won’t take better photographs
Apr 21, 2018 10:22:46 #
billnikon wrote:
It is an interesting observation that you knew EXA... (show quote)
Bill, I think this is pick on Sharpshooter day...., God I love it!!! LoL
I know how many togs there are because the application process says that!
And just who IS, “they”, anyway?!?! LoL
SS
Apr 21, 2018 10:25:40 #
rayr wrote:
They were at a more important pro event, instead of a bike race. You don't need a pro level Olympus EM1 Mark ll shooting 18 fps to shoot a bike race.
So what exactly do you need them for then??? LoL
SS
Apr 21, 2018 10:36:42 #
You probably won't see them at sporting events. I don't think they are up to par with DSLR when it comes to action photos. What's the point of having a small mirrorless body when you are going to mount a huge 200mm or 70-200mm lens on it. Pointless. Also, the viewfinders are a little big lagging in real time. Too hard to photograph using the back of the LCD on moving subjects.
They are good for landscapes, and just about any kind of still.
They are good for landscapes, and just about any kind of still.
SharpShooter wrote:
That’s right guys, I’m looking for all those mirro... (show quote)
Apr 21, 2018 10:40:34 #
They are also great for street photography. I could wear my Sony Nex-6 with the 16-50 lens around my neck all day, ready to take pics whenever. It took very good images with great color and dynamic range. I sold it and now want another camera to replace it, so am looking at the new Panasonics as well as the Sony 6300 or 6500. Nothing worse than missing a possible great shot because you didn't want to bring your camera gear for being too heavy.
Apr 21, 2018 10:43:57 #
xt2
Loc: British Columbia, Canada
SharpShooter wrote:
That’s right guys, I’m looking for all those mirro... (show quote)
"Sharpshooter," who actually cares one way or the other???
Apr 21, 2018 10:45:44 #
Apr 21, 2018 10:55:27 #
Apr 21, 2018 11:01:57 #
I agree with Sharpshooter, (lol) I've been looking for someone that shoots with a mirrorless camera for a long time, (lol) or even a Nikon. (lol) This is very upsetting. (lol) One thing I've learned over the years...if you want to shoot projectiles, get a Canon. If you want to shoot beautiful photograph's, get a Nikon or mirrorless camera. Sharpshooter please...GET A LIFE! (lol)
Apr 21, 2018 11:29:11 #
Ched49 wrote:
I agree with Sharpshooter, (lol) I've been looking for someone that shoots with a mirrorless camera for a long time, (lol) or even a Nikon. (lol) This is very upsetting. (lol) One thing I've learned over the years...if you want to shoot projectiles, get a Canon. If you want to shoot beautiful photograph's, get a Nikon or mirrorless camera. Sharpshooter please...GET A LIFE! (lol)
I’ve gotten a life several times but it’s a slippery little devil and it keeps getting away!!! LoL
SS
Apr 21, 2018 11:48:43 #
mwsilvers
Loc: Central New Jersey
tinplater wrote:
And wait a few weeks until the several million Sony A7III's are delivered....they will be everywhere.
That's doubtful. Pretty much the same thing was said when the a7rII came out followed by the A9. I rarely see either of them. While the cameras themselves might seem ready for professionals and semi pros, they're still not as problem free as Nikon and Canon cameras. In addition, Sony's service centers and overall service approach is far from being ready for that level of shooter. Perhaps someday, but not yet. In the meantime Nikon and Canon shooters can rely on the robustness of their professional level full frame cameras in the field as well as the quality of service they will get it when they need it.
Apr 21, 2018 11:48:59 #
SharpShooter wrote:
I’ve gotten a life several times but it’s a slippery little devil and it keeps getting away!!! LoL
SS
SS
Nice working on the pot stirring SS. Notice the most adamant equals the most hardened fanbois :)
Apr 21, 2018 11:54:28 #
repleo wrote:
You only see the Canon's because they they are white.
Sony makes the f4 70-200mm G and the f2.8 70-200 GM and both those lenses are white. Sony/Minolta have other white lenses.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.