Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
Nude Photography, Boudoir Photography, NSFW, Discussions and Pictures
First Seasoned Nude
Apr 19, 2018 22:43:41   #
Stardust Loc: Central Illinois
 
This falls into the Candid grid that ISO is discussing in a different thread. I was about 24-25 at time, walked by her and just stopped and said something like "you are the most beautiful woman I have seen here. Would you mind if I took a photograph to remember this moment?" She didn't say "no", so I swung my camera up, focused, she smiled and I clicked. I would have loved to removed her purse near her knee, the blue comb by her leg and turned her more to her left towards the sunlight. But then she might had changed her mind as she wondered why I was doing all that. Had forgotten about this shot but looking anew, still my one of my two favorite "seasoned model" photographs.



Reply
Apr 20, 2018 07:57:14   #
BboH Loc: s of 2/21, Ellicott City, MD
 
Yes - she is beautiful.

Reply
Apr 20, 2018 08:26:02   #
jaymatt Loc: Alexandria, Indiana
 
There’s nothing wrong with candid--sometimes capturing the moment is more important than fussing with the details.

Reply
Check out Smartphone Photography section of our forum.
Apr 20, 2018 14:52:07   #
JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
 
As I read your description I found myself going to the photo to look for the purse, look for the comb. Don't beat yourself up over those trivialities (heck, you missed asking her to remove the watch!!!). It is a great candid shot.

Reply
Apr 20, 2018 19:15:30   #
Stardust Loc: Central Illinois
 
jaymatt wrote:
There’s nothing wrong with candid--sometimes capturing the moment is more important than fussing with the details.

Agree 100% - hell, I will take an under-exposed (or over-exposed), out-of-focus, poorly composed, messy shot any day over no shot at all, especially in this day of digital. No cost to shoot, no cost to hit my "delete" button if I don't want to keep.

Reply
Apr 20, 2018 19:28:36   #
Stardust Loc: Central Illinois
 
JohnFrim wrote:
As I read your description I found myself going to the photo to look for the purse, look for the comb. Don't beat yourself up over those trivialities (heck, you missed asking her to remove the watch!!!). It is a great candid shot.


John, thanks for your comments and continued viewing. The watch was jewelry. <giggle> I never beat myself up anymore - too old for that - but the reason I (and assume most others) joined this site was for the forums and to continue to become a better photographer. If we just wanted to look at pretty pictures the Internet has a trillion of them. But here we get to "speak" with the person that took the photo.

So, I think the constructive criticism of what could have been better, as well as compliments on what someone considers good, is important to the learning process. I was drawing attention to the items simply to notify I was aware of it but made a decision at the time not to address for the reason given. I make 99% of my life's decisions based on measuring the "risk against the reward" and act accordingly. In this case I went for the instant shot versus risk of losing it completely.

Reply
Apr 21, 2018 01:35:34   #
Past Pro Loc: Spring Hill, Florida
 
How long ago was this candid taken?

Reply
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
Apr 21, 2018 10:56:46   #
Stardust Loc: Central Illinois
 
Past Pro wrote:
How long ago was this candid taken?

Very early 1970s.

Reply
Apr 21, 2018 13:06:56   #
Rab-Eye Loc: Indiana
 
You captured the moment, and to me, that’s why this is so compelling. Her expression is just perfect. Had you tried to perfect the scene, you likely would have lost the moment. Great image. Will you share a Download?

Reply
Apr 21, 2018 17:03:26   #
Stardust Loc: Central Illinois
 
Rab-Eye wrote:
Great image. Will you share a Download?

Rab-Eye, this was shot with a Pentax Spot-o-matic, with probably their screw threaded portrait lens because it is so closely cropped. (I forget if it was a 120 or 135mm) Assume it was Kodacolor 25 film but don't remember. I mentioned to you early I haven't included Downloads because these are 1970s prints, being scanned on my cheap flat-bed scanner, so no EXIF data except from the scanner. Plus, not taking time to PP these old prints so if zoomed in there are dust particles, scratches, etc. from multiple moves of box or album. However, I am new here so if there is some other reason I am missing to include the Download I have no problem with doing that with most shots. Awaiting reply from anyone.

Reply
Apr 21, 2018 18:47:02   #
Rab-Eye Loc: Indiana
 
Stardust wrote:
Rab-Eye, this was shot with a Pentax Spot-o-matic, with probably their screw threaded portrait lens because it is so closely cropped. (I forget if it was a 120 or 135mm) Assume it was Kodacolor 25 film but don't remember. I mentioned to you early I haven't included Downloads because these are 1970s prints, being scanned on my cheap flat-bed scanner, so no EXIF data except from the scanner. Plus, not taking time to PP these old prints so if zoomed in there are dust particles, scratches, etc. from multiple moves of box or album. However, I am new here so if there is some other reason I am missing to include the Download I have no problem with doing that with most shots. Awaiting reply from anyone.
Rab-Eye, this was shot with a Pentax Spot-o-matic,... (show quote)


Even with the limitations you describe, the Download option is nice because we can see a bigger image. As I said, you captured a great natural moment. I would love to be able to see the larger image, flaws and all.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
Nude Photography, Boudoir Photography, NSFW, Discussions and Pictures
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.