Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Sports Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Super Telephoto Zoom for Nikon DSLR
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Apr 7, 2018 12:19:56   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
chrisg-optical wrote:
Thanks Gene glad to hear that ... was a concern of mine so it looks like it tilted me in favor of the Tamron.


You'll love it. I wish I had waited a few months until the Tamron was available. It's almost 2 lbs lighter than the Sigma.

Reply
Apr 7, 2018 13:30:19   #
linelink
 
I use the Tamron 150-600 GS2 on Nikon cameras. No problem here. Never disappointed. Lighter then the others as I use it hand held quite often. Auto focus and vibration reduction systems as good as any of the other super zooms. Lived in Arizona, near Sedona, shot landscapes. Now residing in Florida and shoot mostly birds. IMHO, go for the Tamron. If you are near a photography store, try all of them on for size! Good luck!

Reply
Apr 7, 2018 15:05:02   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
I don't think three or four ounces is a big deal when comparing the 200-500 and the G2. Could be I guess...

Reply
Check out Travel Photography - Tips and More section of our forum.
Apr 8, 2018 07:39:26   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
nervous2 wrote:
I would appreciate a bit of advice from my friends on Ugly Hedgehog. I currently use a Nikon D7100 DSLR and would like to buy a super telephoto zoom. I think after reading prior discussions and doing the best research that I can, I have narrowed my choice to (1) the AF-S Nikkor 200-500mm f/5.6 E ED VR or (2) the Tamron SP 150-600 f/5.6 Di VC USD G2 for Nikon. I can purchase a Nikon refurbished Nikkor 200-500 thru this coming Monday on the Nikon USA website for $1175 (includes sales tax collected by Nikon) and while I really have no problem with manufacturer refurbished equipment, the warranty is only for 90 days. Alternatively I can purchase a brand new Tamron 150-600 G2 from a Canadian seller with 100% feedback on nearly 11,000 eBay sales for $999.99 with either a 1 year Tamron International Warranty, or if I purchase it thru my cute little daughter-in-law who is Canadian I can have a 6 year warranty with Tamron Canada. I realize that I can go to B&H and purchase either lens new with a USA warranty but either one carries a price of approx. $1400 and I may get some pushback from the household appropriations committee. Frankly, I am leaning towards the Tamron with the Canadian Tamron warranty.

I would first appreciate any thoughts from my knowledgeable friends as to which lens might serve me better. I shoot mostly landscapes but would like to get into animal and bird shots as well. I may at some point upgrade my camera to the D500 or possibly I will venture into the full frame world with a D850. First, any comments or experience on the two lenses from the standpoint of quality would be helpful and second, am I absolutely nuts to consider the new Tamron with the Canadian warranty at a savings over a new USA lens of some $400? Thank you in advance for your assistance and be a bit gentle as I have rather tender feelings. LOL
I would appreciate a bit of advice from my friends... (show quote)


I've never needed warranty work any type of photo gear - going back to the 1970s. A ninety-day warranty would be fine for me.

Some reviews and comparisons -
http://www.the-digital-picture.com/News/News-Post.aspx?News=15236
http://www.kruger-2-kalahari.com/tamron-vs-sigma-150-600.html
http://photo.net/equipment/150-600_lenses
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/latest/articles/tamron-vs-sigma-150-600mm-the-7-key-differences-48183
https://photographylife.com/nikon-200-500mm-vs-tamron-150-600mm-vs-sigma-150-600mm-c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLXocpM5xno
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_msTFAmwWY

https://photographylife.com/nikon-200-500mm-vs-tamron-150-600mm-vs-sigma-150-600mm-c
http://www.davemclelland.com/nikon-200-500-vs-tamron-150-600-lens-comparison/
http://www.davemclelland.com/nikon-200-500-vs-tamron-150-600-lens-comparison/

Reply
Apr 8, 2018 08:44:44   #
Bultaco Loc: Aiken, SC
 
I've been using the Tamron 150-600 G2 on a D7100 for over a year and love it. I'm not dedicated to a brand as some are.

Reply
Apr 8, 2018 08:48:21   #
throughrhettseyes Loc: Rowlett, TX
 
Well well. I got my Nikon 200-500mm new for $1295.00 and no tax with free shipping last year. I love it! I don't believe in refers and used lenses.

Reply
Apr 8, 2018 08:52:40   #
RickTaylor
 
I had the Tamron 150 to 600 generation one. Was extremely disappointed with this lens. I cut my losses and traded it for the 200 to 500 NIKON. I did not even look at the tamron generation 2. Even though my camera store would’ve let me try that lens. Once I have a bad experience I won’t get burned twice. I have never had a problem with any Nikon lens and I am completely satisfied with the 200 to 500 NIKON.

Reply
 
 
Apr 8, 2018 09:24:33   #
gvarner Loc: Central Oregon Coast
 
Regarding limited warranty, get a personal property insurance policy from your insurer. Very cheap if you're not an amateur. Mine is with State Farm. Covers replace or repair, no deductible, no depreciation. All camera gear and accessories, even printers and computers if you want to do that too. It's not a rider on homeowner's policy but a separate policy.

Reply
Apr 8, 2018 09:43:52   #
Rashid Abdu Loc: Ohio
 
A year ago, I bought the Nikon 200-500mm f5.6, and used it with the Nikon D800E and Nikon D4 cameras. I will buy that lens again without giving it a second thought!

Reply
Apr 8, 2018 09:51:03   #
tracs101 Loc: Huntington NY
 
I enjoy my 300mm - 800mm Sigma, but seldom use it.

Reply
Apr 8, 2018 10:13:38   #
dyximan
 
Brucej67 wrote:
Firstly, the Nikon is a fixed minimum f5.6 at all focal lengths and the Tamron is a variable f5.6 to F6.3, the Tamron has 100mm more reach, but at a wide open f6.3 so you might want to take that into consideration.


You maybe speaking of the G1 version as I have the G2 version that is F5 to 6.3. In the past I rented the G1 version and the Nikor both and used it on a D 5300 and. At that time would have chosen the Nikor. As I found it to be a bit quicker and clearer. And found the 500 to 600 mm if you’re not shooting extreme wildlife to be negligible. But neither were extremely quick when focusing and are both fairly heavy although they can be shot hand held a mono pod is helpful for wildlife tripod for landscape. And I understand the image quality now between the two is about the same.

Reply
Check out Software and Computer Support for Photographers section of our forum.
Apr 8, 2018 10:21:24   #
Brucej67 Loc: Cary, NC
 
You are right, I didn't realize that on the G2 version that Tamron made that change. That alone is an improvement in the G2 over the first version. I own the Sigma 150-600mm Sport version and shoot it at 600mm mostly, it is significantly heavier than the Tamron or Sigma Contemporary and I shoot it from either a mono-pod or tripod.

dyximan wrote:
You maybe speaking of the G1 version as I have the G2 version that is F5 to 6.3. In the past I rented the G1 version and the Nikor both and used it on a D 5300 and. At that time would have chosen the Nikor. As I found it to be a bit quicker and clearer. And found the 500 to 600 mm if you’re not shooting extreme wildlife to be negligible. But neither were extremely quick when focusing and are both fairly heavy although they can be shot hand held a mono pod is helpful for wildlife tripod for landscape. And I understand the image quality now between the two is about the same.
You maybe speaking of the G1 version as I have the... (show quote)

Reply
Apr 8, 2018 10:47:10   #
jimneotech Loc: Michigan
 
I have the Nikon 200-500 that I bought refurbished and couldn't be happier with it.

Reply
Apr 8, 2018 10:50:32   #
Screamin Scott Loc: Marshfield Wi, Baltimore Md, now Dallas Ga
 
I've gotten my refurbs from Cameta. Cheaper than from Nikon's website and they extend the Nikon 90 day warranty to a year (at least they do on cameras)

Reply
Apr 8, 2018 10:51:14   #
dyximan
 
Brucej67 wrote:
You are right, I didn't realize that on the G2 version that Tamron made that change. That alone is an improvement in the G2 over the first version. I own the Sigma 150-600mm Sport version and shoot it at 600mm mostly, it is significantly heavier than the Tamron or Sigma Contemporary and I shoot it from either a mono-pod or tripod.

They are definitely beast to hold all day or even for five minutes,Aren’t they. And like you I primarily shoot mine from 500 to 600 I try to back it off a little as I’m told that any lend at either end has a bit of degradation.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out The Pampered Pets Corner section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.