Immigration
Apr 5, 2018 20:19:55 #
dennis2146 wrote:
Holy CRAP! I must be a Liberal.
Dennis
Dennis
Well played! LoL
I do not bash liberals as stupid and narrow like quite a few of my right wing colleagues on here as I do not see them that way. But given the context of speaking towards the estimable Mr Hyperbole Wardlow, your reply is really quite amusing and appropriate!
Apr 5, 2018 22:33:32 #
thom w wrote:
Cute. Cute, but not very relevant to the conversation.
Neither are you.
Apr 6, 2018 00:19:08 #
mwalsh wrote:
Well played! LoL
I do not bash liberals as stupid and narrow like quite a few of my right wing colleagues on here as I do not see them that way. But given the context of speaking towards the estimable Mr Hyperbole Wardlow, your reply is really quite amusing and appropriate!
I do not bash liberals as stupid and narrow like quite a few of my right wing colleagues on here as I do not see them that way. But given the context of speaking towards the estimable Mr Hyperbole Wardlow, your reply is really quite amusing and appropriate!
Gracias amigo.
I see not all but maybe mos as honestly trying to change America into a Socialist country. Look at terminology today. Never before have I heard the term, State, used so often, as in, the zstate will decide this or that. I heard Hillary use it in reference to children being trained/raised by the State. These people like Twardlow will deny it and many who are Liberals don’t have a clue. But it is coming if they have anything to say about it. It was pushed by Obama shen he was in office. He did much to build up other countries but certainly not America. You can disagree but that is what I honestly think. And no this is not some conspiracy theory.
Dennis
Apr 6, 2018 14:29:47 #
as the right wingers would say, " we have to replace the one million you libs abort every year".
Apr 6, 2018 16:03:04 #
thom w wrote:
Not knocking your post. It may have made sense to others, but I couldn't follow it. Who you are for and who you are against was obvious, but I didn't understand the message.
Thom, you have no clue as to what I’m for, against, who I v**e for, or virtually anything else about me.
As for the polls....... there is essentially no way for pollsters to achieve randomness as things like cell phones and manual dialing laws create bias. To correct for this sort of bias in the samples, pollsters make use of weighting. Weighting, by definition, creates its own bias (a form of observer effect).
Apr 6, 2018 16:12:53 #
Twardlow
Loc: Arkansas
Cykdelic wrote:
Thom, you have no clue as to what I’m for, against, who I v**e for, or virtually anything else about me.
As for the polls....... there is essentially no way for pollsters to achieve randomness as things like cell phones and manual dialing laws create bias. To correct for this sort of bias in the samples, pollsters make use of weighting. Weighting, by definition, creates its own bias (a form of observer effect).
As for the polls....... there is essentially no way for pollsters to achieve randomness as things like cell phones and manual dialing laws create bias. To correct for this sort of bias in the samples, pollsters make use of weighting. Weighting, by definition, creates its own bias (a form of observer effect).
You know so little, yet think you know so much....
Apr 6, 2018 16:28:59 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
Cykdelic wrote:
Thom, you have no clue as to what I’m for, against, who I v**e for, or virtually anything else about me.
As for the polls....... there is essentially no way for pollsters to achieve randomness as things like cell phones and manual dialing laws create bias. To correct for this sort of bias in the samples, pollsters make use of weighting. Weighting, by definition, creates its own bias (a form of observer effect).
As for the polls....... there is essentially no way for pollsters to achieve randomness as things like cell phones and manual dialing laws create bias. To correct for this sort of bias in the samples, pollsters make use of weighting. Weighting, by definition, creates its own bias (a form of observer effect).
A little defensive for someone who wasn't attacked.
Apr 6, 2018 17:35:01 #
Twardlow wrote:
You know so little, yet think you know so much....
Oh......does the peanut gallery disagree with someth8ng specific or are you just being your usual jerk-troll self???!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.