Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Would a newer camera get me anything?
Page <<first <prev 6 of 7 next>
Mar 25, 2018 15:32:21   #
ToBoldlyGo Loc: London U.K.
 
Gene51 wrote:
Yes. For openers, a camera that can be repaired if it breaks. The D200, while a great camera, is past it's end of life support from Nikon. Good luck getting it fixed.


That's floored logic. It could last another 10 years, but you want them to spend money on a new one, just in case. Do you also sell boilers?😂

Reply
Mar 25, 2018 16:19:50   #
RKL349 Loc: Connecticut
 
iamimdoc wrote:
I use a Nikon D200. > 10 years old. Works fine

I am a competent amateur. Shoot for fun. Display photos on an 8 X 10 digital picture frame in my office for folks to look at (MD office)
Any prints I make anymore (rare) are 8X10 or less
No sports
No video
Do some pics of grandchild but mainly I do photo on travels (go to the UK for family), flowers, landscape, architecture, some macro work

Does spending up to $2000.00 (or less) for a new camera get me anything for what I do?

My sense is that this is money not well.

Thanks
I use a Nikon D200. > 10 years old. Works fine ... (show quote)



Why not rent one or two bodies that interest you and see for yourself?

Reply
Mar 25, 2018 16:27:09   #
mas24 Loc: Southern CA
 
A Nikon D200 was a great camera when it was first released. But, to be honest with you, It wouldn't even stand up to the discontinued crop sensor D3300 today. The D3300 has 24 megapixels. And you can buy it for $400 brand new. As already mentioned, repairs on both the D200 and D300 are not repairable by Nikon USA Support anymore. Buy another camera. Used, Refurbished, or new. $2000 can get you a lot of good stuff in the Nikon and Canon crop sensor gear. And better than the D3300. Good luck.

Reply
Check out Street Photography section of our forum.
Mar 25, 2018 16:39:27   #
sirlensalot Loc: Arizona
 
It gets you a better sensor with higher ISO capabilities, expanded DR, and probably more features. Whether or not you want or need those upgrades is up to you. Don't think we can answer that for you.
Maybe upgrade with a faster lens first then consider a new body?

Reply
Mar 25, 2018 16:44:24   #
jackpinoh Loc: Kettering, OH 45419
 
iamimdoc wrote:
I use a Nikon D200. > 10 years old. Works fine

I am a competent amateur. Shoot for fun. Display photos on an 8 X 10 digital picture frame in my office for folks to look at (MD office)
Any prints I make anymore (rare) are 8X10 or less
No sports
No video
Do some pics of grandchild but mainly I do photo on travels (go to the UK for family), flowers, landscape, architecture, some macro work

Does spending up to $2000.00 (or less) for a new camera get me anything for what I do?

My sense is that this is money not well.

Thanks
I use a Nikon D200. > 10 years old. Works fine ... (show quote)
if you buy a higher performance cameras, you will also need to buy better lenses to take advantage of the camera’s capability. But you won’t be able to tell the difference in the 8x10 prints.

Reply
Mar 25, 2018 17:06:54   #
Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida
 
Six pages of comments most suggesting to a doctor that he doesn't need to upgrade a ten year old camera that he uses to make images of his grandchildren; and images that will be posted in his office.
BUY an updated, better, camera--today.

Reply
Mar 25, 2018 17:33:10   #
mas24 Loc: Southern CA
 
The Doctor said he had $2000 to spend. That's more than I have now. To spend for extra camera gear. I don't think he has no worries of spending it?

Reply
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
Mar 25, 2018 18:57:32   #
Fotoartist Loc: Detroit, Michigan
 
A new camera will get you a LOT less noise...so irritating with the D200.

Reply
Mar 25, 2018 18:59:57   #
SAVH Loc: La Jolla, CA
 
I can't imagine wanting to spend more money for something when you are apparently perfectly happy with what you have. Many of the replies here have pointed out the "advantages" of buying "up," but they are of no concern if you are pleased with the camera you have and know how to operate. Should you have money that you might spend on a new camera, take it on a trip somewhere and take some more interesting pictures. The "advantages" often cited are often just on the margins.

Reply
Mar 25, 2018 19:13:54   #
jbmauser Loc: Roanoke, VA
 
I may be wrong, forgive me if I am. does the the d200 have a screw driver style motor drive focus in the camera? If not a newer camera in the D7100/7200 class and better will let you pick up great auto focus film era lenses which are in some cases excellent glass and are reasonable. No VR but great GAS fun.

Reply
Mar 25, 2018 20:28:41   #
photostephen
 
jbmauser wrote:
I may be wrong, forgive me if I am. does the the d200 have a screw driver style motor drive focus in the camera? If not a newer camera in the D7100/7200 class and better will let you pick up great auto focus film era lenses which are in some cases excellent glass and are reasonable. No VR but great GAS fun.


Yes, the D200 had the screw driver style moter drive focus. The D200 was the pro model and the D80 was the matching prosumer version. Both had the same focusing motor and could focus all the autofocus Nikon lenses. (I had the D80 until I upgraded to a D300s, and with a few more GAS attacks have upgraded a few more times.) The image quality of the D200/D80 was excellent with its CCD sensor. The problems of the CCD sensors are they are slower to move the image to the memory card (limits Frames per second) and they are more expensive to make than the current CMOS sensors.

Reply
Check out Printers and Color Printing Forum section of our forum.
Mar 25, 2018 20:45:30   #
Ricopix
 
Stick with what you've got and get intimate with it. Digital is a blessing and a curse, too much crap and too many choices just to take a photo. AP, SP, AUTO, PROGRAM, yada,yada yada. I think you should keep the camera and invest in a new lens (get a prime in the focal length you shoot in most). That will remove decision #1 and save some money. Put the rest of what you would have spent on a new camera into a good printer, one designed for photos and a size larger than your 3in1 (I assume). Printing costs may go up a little bit but you'll get a different experience print wise. If you
don't think your PP soft ware suits you then try another. If you still think you need a new camera step up then try one of the newer 16mp rangefinder style cameras that allow you to use the lenses you already have. Keep it light and inexpensive and easy to use. Last but not least, get a history of photography book. Don't think about equipment so much cause photo is a financial black hole. Think about pictures!

Reply
Mar 25, 2018 20:59:57   #
nikonkelly Loc: SE Michigan
 
iamimdoc wrote:
I use a Nikon D200. > 10 years old. Works fine

I am a competent amateur. Shoot for fun. Display photos on an 8 X 10 digital picture frame in my office for folks to look at (MD office)
Any prints I make anymore (rare) are 8X10 or less
No sports
No video
Do some pics of grandchild but mainly I do photo on travels (go to the UK for family), flowers, landscape, architecture, some macro work

Does spending up to $2000.00 (or less) for a new camera get me anything for what I do?

My sense is that this is money not well.
I use a Nikon D200. > 10 years old. Works fine ... (show quote)


You have already seen many answers on both sides of this, with more I believe telling you that you would not gain a lot. I would basically tell you the same... except that the better dynamic range in the D500 or D8xx cameras are very nice... but in my opinion there has never been a better DSLR for shooting fireworks than the D200... period. I gave my D200 to my kids for Christmas this year, they wanted a good camera for taking images of their new baby... they will have good light... if you were to shoot fast sports I would tell you to upgrade in a heartbeat... if you shoot a lot of macros, then the focus stacking in the D850 may be a big help... but it is your choice.
Kelly

Reply
Mar 25, 2018 21:43:46   #
jj56 Loc: Londonderry, NH
 
Ok, so would more resolution (photo AND video ) from a newer technology camera be of benefit you when you move from the 8x10 digital frame to your wide HD flatscreen TV at home to reminisce with the wife and relive life's happy moments? I'm thinking yes since you are into photography. Anyone wish to weigh in on that? It's not all about prints anymore.

Reply
Mar 25, 2018 22:54:04   #
ecurb1105
 
iamimdoc wrote:
I use a Nikon D200. > 10 years old. Works fine

I am a competent amateur. Shoot for fun. Display photos on an 8 X 10 digital picture frame in my office for folks to look at (MD office)
Any prints I make anymore (rare) are 8X10 or less
No sports
No video
Do some pics of grandchild but mainly I do photo on travels (go t I'm the UK for family), flowers, landscape, architecture, some macro work

Does spending up to $2000.00 (or less) for a new camera get me anything for what I do?

My sense is that this is money not well.


Thanks
I use a Nikon D200. > 10 years old. Works fine ... (show quote)


Look for a refurbished D7200.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 7 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out The Pampered Pets Corner section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.