Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Just an opinion
Page <<first <prev 8 of 10 next> last>>
Mar 23, 2018 14:27:24   #
sodapop Loc: Bel Air, MD
 
AMEN !!!!



dls1 wrote:
If you aren’t curious about settings such as aperture speed ISO etc you will not know how to operate your camera. In the old days they had things called instamatics which were fine for snapshots. But people who are interested in the craft of photography want to learn everything they can about how an image is created.

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 14:56:18   #
ToBoldlyGo Loc: London U.K.
 
YeloCab1 wrote:
... The picture on top was taken with my Blackberry phone. The picture on the bottom was taken with my Canon SX50 Powershot. There definitely IS a difference in cameras and other equipment - BUT a picture of a bigfoot or a unicorn taken with a disposable camera or a cheap $1.00 B&W film camera from the 60's would still be worth millions if it could be proven to be real. Quality, settings, equipment and all the other stuff count - but the content is what makes the picture in MY opinion ...


While it of course has banding, and is technically inferior, the Blackberry photo I prefer. It's warmer and makes me feel more like it's a great holiday memory. The better quality photo looks hotter and like less of a memory. Just my opinion of course.

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 15:05:12   #
clickety
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
What does reviewing camera settings and gear used in taking a photograph have to do with "learning by rote"; or " universally constant" information?
Some responses make me wonder if I am living on the same planet.


👍👍👍

Reply
 
 
Mar 23, 2018 15:14:07   #
clickety
 
Opinions are like a--holes. Everyone has one and most of them stink

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 15:56:14   #
traderjohn Loc: New York City
 
clickety wrote:
Opinions are like a--holes. Everyone has one and most of them stink


Even those that agree with you???

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 15:57:54   #
traderjohn Loc: New York City
 
halraiser wrote:
Years ago a friend won a photography contest. Then they asked him what kind of camera and what settings he used. He told them it was just a point and shoot and they revoked his prize.
Snobs!


My take there are quite a few on this site also.

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 16:48:36   #
RJWagons Loc: Lake Ridge Virginia
 
I agree with the original message for the most part but would guess that they list all that information because so many people ask for it, thinking that if they copy, their pictures will be as impressive. Who knows?

Reply
 
 
Mar 23, 2018 16:58:56   #
rbmitch123
 
Manufactures pay to mention their products? I’m writing this response in an IPhone and it’s the best mobile phone I’ve ever owned.

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 16:59:20   #
rbmitch123
 
Manufactures pay to mention their products? I’m writing this response in an IPhone and it’s the best mobile phone I’ve ever owned.

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 16:59:53   #
Bobspez Loc: Southern NJ, USA
 
I like all the info on equipment and settings. When I see a spectacular image it is informative to know the photographer was using specific equipment to get the shot. The settings tell how it was done. You really can't duplicate many types of great shots that others have gotten without the right equipment and knowledge.

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 17:06:42   #
Vince68 Loc: Wappingers Falls, NY
 
mwsilvers wrote:
When I see a great photo I want to know what camera and lens were being used, whether it was on a tripod (I don't care which one), and the aperture, the shutter speed, the ISO and the focal length. I find this information not only interesting but useful in understanding how the final images was created. Additionally, you strangely stated, "So it's not like the photographer knew what the camera was shooting at when taking a picture.". That very odd statement alone makes me question your knowledge and experience as a photographer, regardless of how good your claimed skills might be. I'm surprised no one else picked up on it. I, and most other advanced shooters here, know exactly what our settings are at all times when we capture an image. What's the point of understanding how to get the best from your camera on every shot, if you don't know how your camera is set? Why would you think otherwise? Do you mostly shoot in full auto? Otherwise your statement doesn't make sense. Perhaps you can show us some of these outstanding photos for which you had no idea of the settings when you captured them.

I am also a musician, a drummer to be exact. When I listen to a recording or see a live show where a drummer is performing I am very interested in the drum manufacturer and the models and sizes of the drums, the cymbal brands and sizes, the heads being used on the drums and the sticks being used. All this information, along with technique, is of interest to other drummers. It is similar to the interest photographers here have regarding detailed info on photographs and the equipment used to make them. If that weren't true, this forum would be a couple of orders of magnitude smaller.
When I see a great photo I want to know what camer... (show quote)


Totally agree.... I know what settings my are when I am shooting as I mostly shoot in manual or shutter priority. I can't imagine that anyone would not know what their camera settings were unless they were shooting in full auto all the time.

Also agree with your statement regarding music.... I am the same way when listening to music, as I play guitar. I like knowing what kind of guitar, amp, tubes in the amp, effects, strings, and the settings used on all of the equipment the recording artist uses. That info is important to me and other artists in order to replicate the sound of the original recording when playing the song.

Reply
 
 
Mar 23, 2018 21:21:30   #
SierraP Loc: Eastern Sierras
 
I agree with you.I know that if I went to the same spot, set all the same settings, I wouldn't get the same picture. So, I guess it helps fill another page for that months issue.

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 21:45:27   #
10MPlayer Loc: California
 
Frank G. wrote:
This editorial observation is not directed at any posts on this site, but rather most photography magazines. I have to laugh when I see the technical info about photographs in some magazines. Do I really have to know what model tripod, or Gimbal head was used to hold up the camera that was used to take a picture ? Or is that just pretentious bragging about the photographers expensive equipment ? I also have to wonder about ISO, aperture opening, and shutter speed info.I know you can prioritize or program settings but I'm guessing [of course] that a lot of photographers shooting birds or other unpredictable moving subjects shoot first and look up info later. So it's not like the photographer knew what the camera was shooting at when taking a picture. Like I said this is just my opinion and some might think I don't know what I'm talking about. By the way in addition to my more expensive camera which in keeping with my theme I won't mention I've taken some outstanding photos ,if I do say so myself with a $100 Canon ELF. I used my left hand to hold the camera and my right index finger to click the shutter. Not that you needed to know that technical information.

Hmmm, I wonder what kind of brushes Picasso used.
This editorial observation is not directed at any ... (show quote)


I think reporting exposure info is a traditional thing. In the old days I suppose they kept a notebook and wrote it all down as they took pictures. I agree with the info on the tripod, gimbal head etc. It must be in support of their advertisers. I disagree on the bird photographer comment. I'm pretty sure the photographer took a few test shots at different exposures until he/she found the one best for the situation. He/she doesn't just go out there blind and click away. Not if he wants to get anything worth working with. Good comments. Especially Picasso.

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 21:49:43   #
John Gerlach Loc: Island Park, Idaho
 
I have had several books published on photography technique and hundreds of magazine articles over the years. Originally, I once did not mention camera gear much or exposure settings, but eventually I learned to provide this information because the large majority clearly wanted this information, and absolutely pounded on me when I did not include it. It was brutal as they thought I was keeping secrets (completely untrue), so now I try to be detailed. While exposures can change by the second, it is helpful for someone to see what exposure settings were used to produce an image, such as a bird in flight, or Milky Way shot at night. As far as bragging, I do not know of anyone who lists their gear for that reason. They are just trying to be helpful, and knowing what someone uses can help them get the same or similar gear to improve their own photography.

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 22:07:45   #
jj56 Loc: Londonderry, NH
 
[quote= Really don’t give a damn what camera or “so called” tack sharp lens he used. Right place at the right time is the key.[/quote]

Agree about being in the right place at the right time, but when there ya gotta have some notion as to how to get the shot at the time. Where does that notion come from? If you shoot every day or are a pro I believe it could be second nature. If you’re not that active, well, the tech info (settings) and equipment used to acquire a photo of interest to you could be VERY interesting and educational. Might even be helpful if the details and technique could be remembered and applied in the right situation. So I pay attention to the details when a photo strikes me. And when that photo opportunity arises I hope I do the right thing and capture what I envision.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 8 of 10 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.