Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Just an opinion
Page <<first <prev 6 of 10 next> last>>
Mar 23, 2018 10:13:05   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
DebAnn wrote:
I tend to agree, but here's why. While the settings would have been important to the shooter when making the shot, their importance to the viewer is questionable. The viewer cannot replicate the exact settings at the same scene, at the same time of day, under the same conditions. So, it would seem to me that the knowledge means very little. I don't think I ever go back and look at the settings I used on a shot - I'm just pleased when I got a good one.


Sooo. all your "good" shots are from serendipity and chance - and you are happy with that ??

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 10:17:09   #
cjc2 Loc: Hellertown PA
 
Kmgw9v wrote:
If you are serious, you are wrong.



Reply
Mar 23, 2018 10:27:19   #
Idaho
 
Generally much, but not necessary all, of that information is interesting to experienced photographers. Those who shoot on "auto" and hope for the best would not understand it and consequently would find it unnecessary .

Reply
 
 
Mar 23, 2018 10:28:44   #
leftj Loc: Texas
 
Idaho wrote:
Generally much, but not necessary all, of that information is interesting to experienced photographers. Those who shoot on "auto" and hope for the best would not understand it and consequently would find it unnecessary .


Many knowledgeable photographers shoot Auto when the situation calls for it.

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 10:28:52   #
Largobob
 
Brent Rowlett wrote:
Thanks! And all this time I have been stepping on the cable release with my big toe. No wonder why my photos are not selling. Many thanks for the tip :)


Now that's funny. True story here: When the MacIntosh first came out, it had a mouse. When I took it to our Deputy Superintendent, who had been a Home Economics teacher, she said, "Oh, look. It's got a little foot pedal." (In a VERY Southern drawl.} I guess technology is harder for some than others. LOL

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 10:37:03   #
Bob Locher Loc: Southwest Oregon
 
Having learned photography in the olden days, we had to understand ISO, shutter speeds, apertures, depth of field. I still find it interesting in some shots to know the technical details - other pictures - no - just admire them for what they are. I do agree that intimate knowledge of what camera bag was used, what brand of memory card etc. is excessive. Technical details never hurt though and are easy to ignore for those who care not.

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 10:46:52   #
Paul J. Svetlik Loc: Colorado
 
The tech information doesn't hurt anybody, but can help to someone who just started photography.
When I see a good photograph here, I usually get interested - so I ask, how it was made, camera, optics and filters.

You are never too old to learn something?

Reply
 
 
Mar 23, 2018 10:52:00   #
Brent Rowlett Loc: Atlanta, GA
 
leftj wrote:
Many knowledgeable photographers shoot Auto when the situation calls for it.


You bet! Rarely is one ready for the moment.

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 10:52:50   #
dls1 Loc: Massachusetts
 
If you aren’t curious about settings such as aperture speed ISO etc you will not know how to operate your camera. In the old days they had things called instamatics which were fine for snapshots. But people who are interested in the craft of photography want to learn everything they can about how an image is created.

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 10:58:10   #
jeep_daddy Loc: Prescott AZ
 
Frank G. wrote:
This editorial observation is not directed at any posts on this site, but rather most photography magazines. I have to laugh when I see the technical info about photographs in some magazines. Do I really have to know what model tripod, or Gimbal head was used to hold up the camera that was used to take a picture ? Or is that just pretentious bragging about the photographers expensive equipment ? I also have to wonder about ISO, aperture opening, and shutter speed info.I know you can prioritize or program settings but I'm guessing [of course] that a lot of photographers shooting birds or other unpredictable moving subjects shoot first and look up info later. So it's not like the photographer knew what the camera was shooting at when taking a picture. Like I said this is just my opinion and some might think I don't know what I'm talking about. By the way in addition to my more expensive camera which in keeping with my theme I won't mention I've taken some outstanding photos ,if I do say so myself with a $100 Canon ELF. I used my left hand to hold the camera and my right index finger to click the shutter. Not that you needed to know that technical information.

Hmmm, I wonder what kind of brushes Picasso used.
This editorial observation is not directed at any ... (show quote)


You sound like Andy Rooney from 60 Minutes. LOL

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 11:00:37   #
duane klipping Loc: Bristow iowa
 
I would much rather hear about the journey of the image than the brand of lens wipe used to clean the lens. Settings are not too important but nice to see how others shoot. Brand naming is most likely a way to pay for sponsors who gave mentioned equipment

Reply
 
 
Mar 23, 2018 11:05:33   #
leftj Loc: Texas
 
jeep_daddy wrote:
You sound like Andy Rooney from 60 Minutes. LOL


Bushy eyebrows and all.

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 11:09:17   #
Michael1079 Loc: Indiana
 
Interesting observations. If I am getting ready to photograph something that I have never tried to capture before, I do appreciate the opportunity of looking at similar photos and checking the EXIF data. This helps me plan my shots. When my daughter did dance, I did this so that I could get and idea of shutter speed, aperture and ISO settings. Now, my granddaughter is into soccer and gymnastics. Same thing.

Just my opinion, but I am thankful for whatever tips others have shared.

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 11:09:46   #
Paladin48 Loc: Orlando
 
Frank G. wrote:
This editorial observation is not directed at any posts on this site, but rather most photography magazines. I have to laugh when I see the technical info about photographs in some magazines. Do I really have to know what model tripod, or Gimbal head was used to hold up the camera that was used to take a picture ? Or is that just pretentious bragging about the photographers expensive equipment ? I also have to wonder about ISO, aperture opening, and shutter speed info.I know you can prioritize or program settings but I'm guessing [of course] that a lot of photographers shooting birds or other unpredictable moving subjects shoot first and look up info later. So it's not like the photographer knew what the camera was shooting at when taking a picture. Like I said this is just my opinion and some might think I don't know what I'm talking about. By the way in addition to my more expensive camera which in keeping with my theme I won't mention I've taken some outstanding photos ,if I do say so myself with a $100 Canon ELF. I used my left hand to hold the camera and my right index finger to click the shutter. Not that you needed to know that technical information.

Hmmm, I wonder what kind of brushes Picasso used.
This editorial observation is not directed at any ... (show quote)


And I'm using a Wireless Logitech keyboard AND mouse ... LOL

Reply
Mar 23, 2018 11:18:42   #
dls1 Loc: Massachusetts
 
Don’t confuse the word “brand” with the technical concepts relevant to photography. The reason the technical concepts are associated with brands is precisely because advertisers know technical information is what a serious photographer requires.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 10 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.