Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
A New Question For Conservatives Only
Page 1 of 16 next> last>>
Jul 14, 2012 11:27:37   #
tschmath Loc: Los Angeles
 
All liberals take your fingers off the keyboard. You are not allowed to answer here, only read responses.

To all of the conservative members of UHH:

It's been a bad week for Willard, to say the least. Lots of charges that, if proven true, could derail his candidacy, if not result in federal charges.

None of us know if any of them are true. For right now, just for the sake of discussion, let's assume they are. That would mean he falsified SEC filings and lied under oath about his residency in Massachusetts, among other things. IF (and I emphasize IF) all this is true, will you still vote for Romney in November?

This is an easy question, purely hypothetical. I'm making no judgement here, no assumption of guilt or innocence. Just give me a simple yes or no answer. No commentary, just a yes or no answer. I promise not to respond, I just want to get a sense of how strong his supporters feel. Just a yes or no answer.

This is not about Obama, so just a yes or no answer as to whether or not you would still vote for Romney in November if these charges are proven true. Yes or no. Pretend you're in a voting booth. All you can do is cast a ballot, no commentary, OK?

Reply
Jul 14, 2012 11:33:43   #
1eyedjack
 
YES YES YES

Reply
Jul 14, 2012 14:03:19   #
Robert Graybeal Loc: Myrtle Beach
 
yes

Reply
 
 
Jul 14, 2012 16:19:50   #
SpeedyWilson Loc: Upstate South Carolina
 
I have no intelligent answer for a vague, hypothetical non-answerable non-question.

Reply
Jul 14, 2012 16:39:12   #
ted45 Loc: Delaware
 
tschmath wrote:
All liberals take your fingers off the keyboard. You are not allowed to answer here, only read responses.

To all of the conservative members of UHH:

It's been a bad week for Willard, to say the least. Lots of charges that, if proven true, could derail his candidacy, if not result in federal charges.

None of us know if any of them are true. For right now, just for the sake of discussion, let's assume they are. That would mean he falsified SEC filings and lied under oath about his residency in Massachusetts, among other things. IF (and I emphasize IF) all this is true, will you still vote for Romney in November?

This is an easy question, purely hypothetical. I'm making no judgement here, no assumption of guilt or innocence. Just give me a simple yes or no answer. No commentary, just a yes or no answer. I promise not to respond, I just want to get a sense of how strong his supporters feel. Just a yes or no answer.

This is not about Obama, so just a yes or no answer as to whether or not you would still vote for Romney in November if these charges are proven true. Yes or no. Pretend you're in a voting booth. All you can do is cast a ballot, no commentary, OK?
All liberals take your fingers off the keyboard. ... (show quote)


I agree with MrWilson. Exactly what charges are you referring to?

Perhaps since you feel comfortable referring to candidate Romney as Willard, I can refer to Obama as Hussein in future comments. Seems fair.

Reply
Jul 14, 2012 16:46:33   #
Robert Graybeal Loc: Myrtle Beach
 
there is always a f-up in every group

Reply
Jul 14, 2012 17:03:47   #
BigBear Loc: Northern CT
 
Robert Graybeal wrote:
there is always a f-up in every group


Then don't come in and there won't be !!!

Reply
 
 
Jul 14, 2012 17:28:07   #
tschmath Loc: Los Angeles
 
ted45 wrote:
I agree with MrWilson. Exactly what charges are you referring to?

Perhaps since you feel comfortable referring to candidate Romney as Willard, I can refer to Obama as Hussein in future comments. Seems fair.


Have you been hiding under a rock for the past week? There are numerous stories from a variety of sources that dispute Romney's claim that he had nothing to do with Bain after February 1999. If true, he lied on SEC filings about his role, or he's lying now. If true, he lied under oath when he ran for Governor or he's lying now. Look at the story in The Boston Globe and see for yourself. There's nothing hypothetical at all here. These are real, very serious findings that he refuses to explain with evidence (like some income tax returns).

As to the use of Willard, that is his first name. Most of us go by our given first names, because we are too grounded to sound pretentious like him. Hussein is President Obama's middle name. My using his first name is an attempt to show how disconnected Romney is from most people, while your use of Hussein is an attempt to smear the President as a Muslim terrorist. So you have created a false equivalency with your argument, and I totally reject its validity.

Reply
Jul 14, 2012 17:31:48   #
BigBear Loc: Northern CT
 
tschmath wrote:
ted45 wrote:
I agree with MrWilson. Exactly what charges are you referring to?

Perhaps since you feel comfortable referring to candidate Romney as Willard, I can refer to Obama as Hussein in future comments. Seems fair.


Have you been hiding under a rock for the past week? There are numerous stories from a variety of sources that dispute Romney's claim that he had nothing to do with Bain after February 1999. If true, he lied on SEC filings about his role, or he's lying now. If true, he lied under oath when he ran for Governor or he's lying now. Look at the story in The Boston Globe and see for yourself. There's nothing hypothetical at all here. These are real, very serious findings that he refuses to explain with evidence (like some income tax returns).

As to the use of Willard, that is his first name. Most of us go by our given first names, because we are too grounded to sound pretentious like him. Hussein is President Obama's middle name. My using his first name is an attempt to show how disconnected Romney is from most people, while your use of Hussein is an attempt to smear the President as a Muslim terrorist. So you have created a false equivalency with your argument, and I totally reject its validity.
quote=ted45 I agree with MrWilson. Exactly what ... (show quote)


Most of us are too busy working to support the rest of you and don't always have time to catch up on the current opinions you call news.

Reply
Jul 14, 2012 17:33:49   #
thepopularman
 
People who study photopgraphy know they need light to create a good picture, why are so many here still in the dark?

Reply
Jul 14, 2012 17:36:09   #
BigBear Loc: Northern CT
 
thepopularman wrote:
People who study photopgraphy know they need light to create a good picture, why are so many here still in the dark?


We keep trying to shine the light on them but they keep hiding in the corner.

Reply
 
 
Jul 14, 2012 17:44:01   #
thepopularman
 
their are in round room (no corners)what goes around comes around

Reply
Jul 14, 2012 17:46:17   #
BigBear Loc: Northern CT
 
thepopularman wrote:
their are in round room (no corners)what goes around comes around


They still don't like the light.

Reply
Jul 14, 2012 17:52:21   #
traveler90712 Loc: Lake Worth, Fl.
 
MisterWilson wrote:
I have no intelligent answer for a vague, hypothetical non-answerable non-question.


What he said!

Reply
Jul 14, 2012 17:53:06   #
ted45 Loc: Delaware
 
tschmath wrote:
ted45 wrote:
I agree with MrWilson. Exactly what charges are you referring to?

Perhaps since you feel comfortable referring to candidate Romney as Willard, I can refer to Obama as Hussein in future comments. Seems fair.


Have you been hiding under a rock for the past week? There are numerous stories from a variety of sources that dispute Romney's claim that he had nothing to do with Bain after February 1999. If true, he lied on SEC filings about his role, or he's lying now. If true, he lied under oath when he ran for Governor or he's lying now. Look at the story in The Boston Globe and see for yourself. There's nothing hypothetical at all here. These are real, very serious findings that he refuses to explain with evidence (like some income tax returns).

As to the use of Willard, that is his first name. Most of us go by our given first names, because we are too grounded to sound pretentious like him. Hussein is President Obama's middle name. My using his first name is an attempt to show how disconnected Romney is from most people, while your use of Hussein is an attempt to smear the President as a Muslim terrorist. So you have created a false equivalency with your argument, and I totally reject its validity.
quote=ted45 I agree with MrWilson. Exactly what ... (show quote)


Those claims have already been proven a complete fabrication by the Obama team. One of the people disputing the accuracy of those claims was Pres. Bill Clinton. If there was even a shred of truth in those claims Eric Holder would be all over the news filing charges. Perhaps you should come out from under your rock.

Again you resort to misrepresentation to make your point. You really need a new act. I said nothing about Muslim, or Terrorist. You said that. It is common courtesy to address people in public by their title or at least as Mr., Mrs. or simply by their last name. I was merely pointing out that if you find it acceptable to exhibit such a level of disrespect to a public official, then so can I. Actually my statement was more in the way of sarcasm than anything I would consider doing.

Try to get a little class.

Reply
Page 1 of 16 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.