Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Are you still using ND/CP filters, or replicating them in post?
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Mar 8, 2018 21:04:14   #
Rab-Eye Loc: Indiana
 
The subject line is the question. I would also be interested in hearing why you have chosen your particular method.

Thanks!

Reply
Mar 8, 2018 21:16:15   #
Mac Loc: Pittsburgh, Philadelphia now Hernando Co. Fl.
 
Rab-Eye wrote:
The subject line is the question. I would also be interested in hearing why you have chosen your particular method.

Thanks!


I don't think you can replicate a CP filter in post.

Reply
Mar 8, 2018 21:40:00   #
pesfls Loc: Oregon, USA
 
Mac wrote:
I don't think you can replicate a CP filter in post.


Agreed. They seem lame compared to the real thing. At least that is my observation.

Reply
 
 
Mar 8, 2018 21:42:07   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
Ben, ND maybe. CP no way. There's some hack on youtube that claims to be able to replicate these, but, in all reality, nothing like the real thing.
--Bob
Rab-Eye wrote:
The subject line is the question. I would also be interested in hearing why you have chosen your particular method.

Thanks!

Reply
Mar 8, 2018 21:50:25   #
JohnSwanda Loc: San Francisco
 
rmalarz wrote:
Ben, ND maybe. CP no way. There's some hack on youtube that claims to be able to replicate these, but, in all reality, nothing like the real thing.
--Bob


I don't know how you would replicate the ND filters either. They allow you to shoot wide open or do long exposures in very bright light, and I can't see how you do that in post.

Reply
Mar 8, 2018 21:56:28   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
John, a graduated ND can be approximated in processing. A single grade ND, probably not.
--Bob
JohnSwanda wrote:
I don't know how you would replicate the ND filters either. They allow you to shoot wide open or do long exposures in very bright light, and I can't see how you do that in post.

Reply
Mar 8, 2018 22:49:40   #
crazydaddio Loc: Toronto Ontario Canada
 
CP filters effects are about the only thing that cant be replicated in post....
Most other effects can be approximated in PS.

Reply
 
 
Mar 8, 2018 23:14:45   #
RichardTaylor Loc: Sydney, Australia
 
I try to get it right as possible in camera so it is real filters if need be, although I am not adverse to post processing.

Reply
Mar 8, 2018 23:18:15   #
Joe Blow
 
Approximated is not the same as replicated. ND allows special use of a camera's attributes. Many of its abilities can not be duplicated in PP. CP can't be replicated in PP.

Reply
Mar 9, 2018 00:26:23   #
Rab-Eye Loc: Indiana
 
rmalarz wrote:
John, a graduated ND can be approximated in processing. A single grade ND, probably not.
--Bob


Yes, I should have been more specific. I was thinking graduated ND. Thank you, everyone.

Reply
Mar 9, 2018 01:57:26   #
rgrenaderphoto Loc: Hollywood, CA
 
I prefer the flexibility in composition that a ND Grad allows when the sky can overwhelm the foreground. I know you can do almost the same thing in Lightroom with a graduated filter and adjusting the sliders, but getting it right when taking the photograph gives me a better starting place when I go into Lightroom.

What about you Rab, what do you use?

Reply
 
 
Mar 9, 2018 02:00:29   #
Jesu S
 
Rab-Eye wrote:
The subject line is the question. I would also be interested in hearing why you have chosen your particular method.

Thanks!


I try to do as much as I can in-camera. Reason: Just too darn lazy, I guess!

Reply
Mar 9, 2018 03:49:06   #
Leicaflex Loc: Cymru
 
I was always taught in my early years of photography to compose, check your ASA, shutter speed and aperture, exposure and get it right in camera.
Further adjustments to the image should also be made at the point of creation.
If the sky needs adjustments, neutral density filters, colour filters, depending on what film you are using and the wonderful circular polariser are a must.
I agree with my fellow photographers above, there is no such post-processing that can replicate a good quality CP.

Reply
Mar 9, 2018 05:58:37   #
wdross Loc: Castle Rock, Colorado
 
Rab-Eye wrote:
The subject line is the question. I would also be interested in hearing why you have chosen your particular method.

Thanks!


There is no real true way to replicate the affects of a polarizer except by using a polarizer. Neutral density can somewhat be produced in PP, but for me it is better to get as much done as possible before any PP.

Reply
Mar 9, 2018 06:03:57   #
Jeffcs Loc: Myrtle Beach South Carolina
 
Somethings just really can’t be duplicated in post
Best to always get it right in the camera first
Than post isn’t a tool to bring a poor quality image back from the dead pile but an enhancement tool
Better to improve a great quality image

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.