Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
Thinking on the fly/Saved by Lightroom
Feb 25, 2018 11:38:26   #
SBrodsky Loc: Northern Colorado
 
Took these on assignment for several suburban Denver community newspapers that I freelance for. Was a Daddy/Daughter dance in a darkened gymnasium. Had auto ISO ON and was @ 25,000 for the girls working on crafts. No flash. Was able to reduce the noise in Lightroom, so it works, but had I had it to do over, I'd have turned auto ISO OFF, and gone w/6400, which is what I did for the dancing shot. Flash w/Gary Fong Lightsphere was used for this one, though dialed back -0.3. Now I know what you wedding photogs encounter in darkened receptions. Ugh. Nikon 7200 Sigma 24-70 2.8 Nikon 700 Speedlight.





Reply
Feb 25, 2018 11:42:00   #
rgrenaderphoto Loc: Hollywood, CA
 
Yeah, but you got the results you were looking for. Good for you.

Reply
Feb 25, 2018 11:45:21   #
SBrodsky Loc: Northern Colorado
 
Yes, but in addition to pulling my hair out trying to figure out camera settings, I have to pull out my reporter's notebook and ask people their names, ages, hometowns, etc, in order to write captions. Too much to worry about, but it all goes fast. Thanks for your comments.

Reply
 
 
Feb 25, 2018 12:05:46   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
Auto anything is usually not the path I choose. These came out really nice.
--Bob
SBrodsky wrote:
Took these on assignment for several suburban Denver community newspapers that I freelance for. Was a Daddy/Daughter dance in a darkened gymnasium. Had auto ISO ON and was @ 25,000 for the girls working on crafts. No flash. Was able to reduce the noise in Lightroom, so it works, but had I had it to do over, I'd have turned auto ISO OFF, and gone w/6400, which is what I did for the dancing shot. Flash w/Gary Fong Lightsphere was used for this one, though dialed back -0.3. Now I know what you wedding photogs encounter in darkened receptions. Ugh. Nikon 7200 Sigma 24-70 2.8 Nikon 700 Speedlight.
Took these on assignment for several suburban Denv... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 25, 2018 12:24:36   #
chaman
 
rmalarz wrote:
Auto anything is usually not the path I choose. These came out really nice.
--Bob


My thoughts exactly. These were taken RAW?

Reply
Feb 25, 2018 12:25:34   #
SBrodsky Loc: Northern Colorado
 
JPEG Large Fine

Reply
Feb 25, 2018 12:40:32   #
chaman
 
SBrodsky wrote:
JPEG Large Fine


Having shot RAW a much cleaner image could have been obtained. Also, try to shoot manually next time and have control of you ISO. I shot recently a theater presentation with bad and mixed lighting. On top of that a WB was difficult to nail since sometimes they used colored lights. Just a nightmare. If I had chosen AUTO ISO the camera would go for an absurd value in the 12,000s or higher. I decided to keep it at 6400. Shot RAW and properly PP in LR:

conservatorio201875 by Oscar Baez Soria, on Flickr

conservatorio2018348 by Oscar Baez Soria, on Flickr

Reply
 
 
Feb 25, 2018 12:43:25   #
SBrodsky Loc: Northern Colorado
 
Thanks for the tips and very nice photos BTW. I might want to do JPEG/RAW. My papers usually like me shooting in the JPEG format.

Reply
Feb 25, 2018 13:15:51   #
Joe Blow
 
SBrodsky wrote:
Thanks for the tips and very nice photos BTW. I might want to do JPEG/RAW. My papers usually like me shooting in the JPEG format.


Most outlets prefer JPG for publishing. Use RAW when you take the photo and then edit it in Post Processing. It is much easier to get your white balance, reduce noise, etc. When you are finished editing it, you would save it as a JPG for your publisher.

Reply
Feb 25, 2018 13:51:30   #
SBrodsky Loc: Northern Colorado
 
Thanks

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.