Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
18-135mm Canon EF-S lens equivalent for FF
Page <prev 2 of 2
Feb 4, 2018 10:04:56   #
AzPicLady Loc: Behind the camera!
 
DebAnn wrote:
Thanks, I'll look at those. I just discovered that there are a lot of Canon EF 28-135 used lenses available. It got fairly good reviews when it was new. I don't want to spend a fortune.


By all means, get the 28-135. It's a great lens. I have one that's probably 20 years old and still working perfectly. It's VERY sharp.

Reply
Feb 4, 2018 10:24:29   #
DebAnn Loc: Toronto
 
Thanks - I learned something new today since I had never heard of Canandaigua, even though I have visited the Finger Lakes.
cochese wrote:
Canandaigua is my home town! Not on topic but... On topic, why not third party? Tamron has a couple of full frame 28-300 lenses that while not stellar are reasonable sharp. All are comparable to the 18-135. Decent for a walk about lens.

Reply
Feb 4, 2018 10:52:07   #
CanonTom Loc: Birmingham
 
JPL wrote:
You are right. I was actually quite surprised about the 28-300 Canon lens pricing and that they have no 24-120 lens and your info about the quality of the 24-105 lenses. It seems the best choice for the op would be to continue with Aps-c cameras or switch brands if full frame and zoom lens combo is a must.

An option could be the Tamron 28-300 lens. The price is good, I have no idea about the quality.


I have a Tamron 28-300 FF. It's quality is not Canon L by any means, but it takes very nice and quite sharp photos IMHO. Perhaps a little soft at 300, but for my purposes fine for the most part. I have enjoyed this lens and used it quite often for the past 7 years or so on a Canon 60D, APS-C.

Reply
 
 
Feb 4, 2018 11:22:41   #
mikedidi46 Loc: WINTER SPRINGS, FLORIDA
 
or the 24-105 would also work, but 28-200 is closer

Reply
Feb 4, 2018 12:00:07   #
ole sarg Loc: south florida
 
We have gone through this hundreds of times. The focal length does not change only the field of view.

Reply
Feb 4, 2018 12:37:28   #
cochese
 
J2e wrote:
We moved to Candaigua July 2016 and love it here. City Pier presents seemingly endless photo ops.
My arsenal:
Canon T3i
Canon 18-135 STM
Tokina 12-28
Canon 50mm f/1.8


I lived there until my mid 20's, then spent some time travelling the US before ending up in Florida for about ten years. Then moved back and then to my home now which is in the Adirondack Mountains of NY. The city pier and thousands of points around the lake. Also many places to shoot farm shots.
My arsenal:
Canon 60D
Sigma 17-50 f2.8 OS HSM
Sigma 50-150 f2.8 EX OS HSM
Sigma 120-400 f4.5-5.6 OS HSM
Sigma 1.4x EX DG Teleconverter
Tamron 60 f2 Macro

Reply
Feb 4, 2018 13:04:21   #
J2e Loc: Canandaigua, NY
 
I also have Canon 55-250mm, but I seldom use it.
The Adirondack Mountains is a wonderful area, but a bit harsh for us. The Finger Lakes is a good fit. I like to frequent the state parks - Taughannock Falls, Watkins Glen, Letchworth, Robert Treman, Chimney Bluffs.

Reply
 
 
Feb 4, 2018 17:33:11   #
kdogg Loc: Gallipolis Ferry WV
 
I too have the same Minolta Rokkor lens left over from my film days. I bought an Fotodiox adapter to use them on my 7d and 7d II with great results.Got to love that old glass.
DebAnn wrote:
Thanks for that Alan. It's a lot to think about. Up until recently I had pretty much focused on portraiture and just self published a family retrospective of work done over the last 40 years. I have now become interested in landscape photography and was thinking it would be good to have something with more low light capability. My current camera is a 70D and I must say that I'm very happy with it. So I think your comments about the lenses are swaying me towards sticking with it for now.
I have a family wedding coming up and that camera along with a T3i served me well for the last two weddings I photographed.
Weddings aren't something I'd do for anyone else but family but they do come up from time to time.

I also have a good selection of lenses which are mostly EF-S so they don't work with full frames. I have that 18-135 which I really like, a 55-250 which doesn't get used much, A new Sigma 10-20 which I like, a Sigma 50mm which is great and an EF 28-80 which isn't particularly noteworthy. I have thought about getting a Sony because I have two old Minolta Rokkor X lenses which are excellent - a 50mm and a 28mm. But maybe I'll stick with the 70D for now. Your information was much appreciated.
Thank you.
Thanks for that Alan. It's a lot to think about. U... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 4, 2018 17:37:21   #
DebAnn Loc: Toronto
 
Me too. They were hard to beat. Things just aint what they used to be!
kdogg wrote:
I too have the same Minolta Rokkor lens left over from my film days. I bought an Fotodiox adapter to use them on my 7d and 7d II with great results.Got to love that old glass.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.