CAMERA BUYING DECISION
Dec 31, 2017 09:16:28 #
Have the opportunity to purchase one of 2 cameras.
Nikon D7200 in like new condition with 840 shots. Body, battery and charger only = $750
DX FORMAT 24MP
Canon 5D MKII in like new condition with under 1200 shots. Body, battery, charger, brand new speed light, remote, 64GB compact flash, cables and instructions. = $780
FULL FRAME FORMAT 21MP
I have never owned a Canon so I know nothing of the Canon brand. If there were both close to the same age this would not even be an issue.
My question is, is the Canon full frame worth it over the DX even though it is 8 years older?
Nikon D7200 in like new condition with 840 shots. Body, battery and charger only = $750
DX FORMAT 24MP
Canon 5D MKII in like new condition with under 1200 shots. Body, battery, charger, brand new speed light, remote, 64GB compact flash, cables and instructions. = $780
FULL FRAME FORMAT 21MP
I have never owned a Canon so I know nothing of the Canon brand. If there were both close to the same age this would not even be an issue.
My question is, is the Canon full frame worth it over the DX even though it is 8 years older?
Dec 31, 2017 09:34:43 #
Good deals on both
Look em up in DPReview and compare the two.
I started with Canon, but use the lenses on a Sony mirrorless now.
Have fun!
Look em up in DPReview and compare the two.
I started with Canon, but use the lenses on a Sony mirrorless now.
Have fun!
Dec 31, 2017 09:34:53 #
First of all the used D7200 isn't worth $750 to me as you can buy a brand new one for $799. Is it really 840 shots but regardless Nikon won't warranty your used camera. I don't know about the Canon though. Once again 1200 shots seems some one bought the camera and never used. Can you believe it?
Dec 31, 2017 09:37:09 #
BebuLamar wrote:
First of all the used D7200 isn't worth $750 to me as you can buy a brand new one for $799. Is it really 840 shots but regardless Nikon won't warranty your used camera. I don't know about the Canon though. Once again 1200 shots seems some one bought the camera and never used. Can you believe it?
My bad! Nikon has raised the price of the D7200 by $200.
Dec 31, 2017 09:41:11 #
BebuLamar wrote:
First of all the used D7200 isn't worth $750 to me as you can buy a brand new one for $799. Is it really 840 shots but regardless Nikon won't warranty your used camera. I don't know about the Canon though. Once again 1200 shots seems some one bought the camera and never used. Can you believe it?
If you want the Nikon I would suggest you heed Bebu's advice.
Your lens situation should play a part in your decision.
--
Edit
Based on the updated price I still wouldn't spring for the used Nikon. These sales from Nikon pop up all the time and often include the battery grip.
Dec 31, 2017 09:42:45 #
authorizeduser wrote:
Have the opportunity to purchase one of 2 cameras.... (show quote)
I would keep looking and pick up a fuĺl frame Nikon.
Dec 31, 2017 09:55:38 #
The 5DIII is priced at half the street-value of a used version of this camera (now $1200 - $1500). Is this price an error or is there something wrong with the camera? If this is the price, you could resell at a $300 to $700 profit even if you didn't want it ...
Also, what is a "brand new speed light". For a Canon flash, that's another unique product worth $200 to $500, depending on the model. All this sounds like a scam ...
Also, what is a "brand new speed light". For a Canon flash, that's another unique product worth $200 to $500, depending on the model. All this sounds like a scam ...
Dec 31, 2017 09:57:47 #
CHG_CANON wrote:
The 5DIII is priced at half the street-value of a used version of this camera (now $1200 - $1500). Is this price an error or is there something wrong with the camera? If this is the price, you could resell at a $300 to $700 profit even if you didn't want it ...
I thought the OP said the MKII?
Dec 31, 2017 09:59:59 #
BebuLamar wrote:
I thought the OP said the MKII?
You are right ... I seem to have been wishfully reading ... For a mark II, in the $800 range would be a good price. But, see my point about "brand new speed light".
Jan 1, 2018 10:32:05 #
Over the years, as I have 'upgraded' my camera bodies, I was so happy when I saw the 5DII on sale. Since that time, I've used it for everything, to include travel in and out of our country. Even after looking at the 5DIII and following, I've not found anything they would do for me that I'm not already enjoying with my 5DII. Now with three L series lenses, I don't see how I could do better. Now, to show you my dedication, I bought a used 5DII body should a day come when my original needs to go into the shop. So my vote would be for you to purchase the Canon 5DII.
Jan 1, 2018 10:47:31 #
jackpi
Loc: Southwest Ohio
authorizeduser wrote:
Have the opportunity to purchase one of 2 cameras.... (show quote)
Before you buy any camera you should be able to answer several questions: What do you intend to photograph? Will you be printing large prints (greater than 8"x10")? Will you be photographing in very low light? Will you be using more than one lens? Is weight of the camera + lens an issue? Can you invest 10's or 100's of hours learning to improve your craft? Can you hold a camera steady for slow shutter speed shots? Don't allow yourself to be sold something you don't understand.
Jan 1, 2018 12:30:07 #
Jan 1, 2018 13:22:13 #
Jerry Coupe
Loc: Kent, WA
If you are shooting landscapes, still life, portraits, then the Canon 5D MK II will serve you just fine. I have also read many good comments about the D7200.
However, if subjects are in motion-sports, autos, birds, animals, I was never happy with the focusing speed or accuracy of the 5D MkII. This is just my personal experience and perhaps I was just not good at it.
However, if subjects are in motion-sports, autos, birds, animals, I was never happy with the focusing speed or accuracy of the 5D MkII. This is just my personal experience and perhaps I was just not good at it.
Jan 1, 2018 13:57:03 #
Wow! No one has mentioned that the Canon 5D series is full frame, the D7200 is crop (DX, APS-C). You must understand the difference between full frame (FF, FX) and crop sensor (APS-C, DX). The FF uses a sensor the same size as 35mm film. The APS-C type has a smaller sensor that equates to using a lens of focal length 1.5 (or 1.6) times greater on a FF.
FF bodies are mostly more much expensive than APS-C, and many lenses are only available for the APS-C bodies. Lenses for FF work fine on APS-C bodies, as long as you realize the magnification factor.
Another point; the advantage of FF is that for the same pixel count, the pixels are much larger and for a given ISO setting can function with much less noise levels and can work in dimmer light as they collect more light per pixel.
As far as Canon vs Nikon, they both make fine cameras with the most available lenses (both OEM or aftermarket) to choose from. You should go to any store that has both and press buttons, read menus to see which you understand more easily, and which feels most comfortable.
FF bodies are mostly more much expensive than APS-C, and many lenses are only available for the APS-C bodies. Lenses for FF work fine on APS-C bodies, as long as you realize the magnification factor.
Another point; the advantage of FF is that for the same pixel count, the pixels are much larger and for a given ISO setting can function with much less noise levels and can work in dimmer light as they collect more light per pixel.
As far as Canon vs Nikon, they both make fine cameras with the most available lenses (both OEM or aftermarket) to choose from. You should go to any store that has both and press buttons, read menus to see which you understand more easily, and which feels most comfortable.
Jan 1, 2018 14:05:26 #
authorizeduser wrote:
Have the opportunity to purchase one of 2 cameras.... (show quote)
Side by side comparison:
http://cameradecision.com/compare/Nikon-D7200-vs-Canon-EOS-5D-Mark-II
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.