So, how much editing do you do?
Dec 25, 2017 21:27:00 #
As much as is required to get the result I want. I tend to photograph with this in mind:
"The concept of the photograph precedes the operation of the camera. The print [image] itself is somewhat of an interpretation, a performance of the photographic idea."— Ansel Adams. I rarely do photographs of people nor do I hire out, so I am free to photograph and process in the way I want.
"The concept of the photograph precedes the operation of the camera. The print [image] itself is somewhat of an interpretation, a performance of the photographic idea."— Ansel Adams. I rarely do photographs of people nor do I hire out, so I am free to photograph and process in the way I want.
Dec 25, 2017 22:32:32 #
Resqu2 wrote:
I did a (free) photo shoot for my Sis-n-law, husba... (show quote)
Sounds like this photographer was better than you. Happens, I wouldn’t worry about it. On the other hand, they may have not liked your results enough to do future shoots. That should be ok as well. Like captain said, if the couple/parents were happy, that is all that matters.
Dec 25, 2017 22:33:01 #
Resqu2 wrote:
I did a (free) photo shoot for my Sis-n-law, husba... (show quote)
I personally don’t do a lot of editing...I only use LR, for a quick crop, adjust exposure a little, maybe a small bump in contrast, clarity or dehaze. I don’t judge those who do more editing. In my view, it’s their art and their creativeness coming out. I just choose not to do a lot because my style is more natural unless I am trying to “save” an image that’s too far gone and I have a need to manipulate it further to make it presentable. When it comes to people though, I was taught to make sure you never remove more than you should... because a birthmark or mole would be noticeably absent and it may be something that would insult the person being photographed if it’s removed in post. Just my two cents.
Dec 25, 2017 22:42:02 #
Laura72568 wrote:
I personally don’t do a lot of editing...I only us... (show quote)
Right! But you can find badly processed “natural looking” results and also tastefully done ones. Same with “heavy processing”. Always depends on the photographer. Doesn’t matter how much processing the photographer is applying, as long as it is done well.
Dec 25, 2017 23:00:04 #
Most images can benefit from some careful dodging and/or burning here and there.
Dec 25, 2017 23:56:14 #
rook2c4 wrote:
Most images can benefit from some careful dodging and/or burning here and there.
Agree.
Dec 26, 2017 02:39:20 #
bsprague wrote:
If you shoot RAW (and I do), it has to be processed. In fact, it is the point of shooting RAW.
Raw does not HAVE to be processed, but yes, it usually is. I shoot LOTS of raw that don't need any processing, but they can always be enhanced. So anything that I print or post gets some processing but could be fine without it.
SS
Dec 26, 2017 02:52:38 #
Here are two shots with the SOOC and the finished image.
Like everybody, how much PP depends on how well I took the original shot, mostly proper exposure.
I'll let you be the judge.
My shots are all Lightroom, so there's only so much I can do anyway!!
SS
Like everybody, how much PP depends on how well I took the original shot, mostly proper exposure.
I'll let you be the judge.
My shots are all Lightroom, so there's only so much I can do anyway!!
SS
Dec 26, 2017 06:14:50 #
winkleaf
Loc: Blue Bell, PA
My experience (after MANY years) is that a bit more attention when taking the picture saves me hours in front of my computer ...
I use Lightroom to make my necessary adjustments, only 1 in about 50 images gets the Photoshop treatment.
This philosophy gives me more time to enjoy life and to take even more pictures.
I use Lightroom to make my necessary adjustments, only 1 in about 50 images gets the Photoshop treatment.
This philosophy gives me more time to enjoy life and to take even more pictures.
Dec 26, 2017 06:38:02 #
billnikon
Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
Resqu2 wrote:
I did a (free) photo shoot for my Sis-n-law, husba... (show quote)
It's much like cooking. I spice to taste.
Dec 26, 2017 06:44:53 #
Resqu2 wrote:
I did a (free) photo shoot for my Sis-n-law, husba... (show quote)
I go down the right column in LR. Cropping, exposure, contrast, etc. I also check the box to enable camera/lens correction. I shoot NEF (raw), so processing is necessary. It goes pretty fast.
Dec 26, 2017 07:08:14 #
Fred Harwood wrote:
While I shoot for realism, I shoot raw and can adapt to the customers' preferences.......
Doesn't money subjugate your desire to "shoot for realism"? If they want your work altered in such a way then the realism is lost.
Dec 26, 2017 07:24:53 #
Resqu2 wrote:
I did a (free) photo shoot for my Sis-n-law, husba... (show quote)
I adjust as little as needed. When I like it then that is enough.
Dec 26, 2017 07:34:39 #
Steve Perry wrote:
Totally depends on the shot. Some of my images need next to nothing and look just the way I like, others need some love to get them to that place. In the end, I strive for believable, realistic images that reflect the scene as I experienced it.
I have the same mindset.
Dec 26, 2017 07:35:59 #
Resqu2 wrote:
I did a (free) photo shoot for my Sis-n-law, husba... (show quote)
Cropping for sure, often adjusting color or contrast. Sometimes eliminating unwanted objects, and for ladies, removing some lines or blemishes. Very seldom, sharpening.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.