leftj wrote:
You are making meaningless points to obfuscate your original post which represented an L lens as having something other than an EF mount.
If you bother to go back and actually read my first post on this topic, it refers to the quality of the lens, not the style of the mount.
You are the one who is making meaningless points to obfuscate your responses. Confusion on your part in how you were reading my post.
It's been debated ad nauseum on UHH, that Canon has three distinctive classes of lenses, consumer grade, prosumer grade, and professional grade lenses.
The quality of the build of the lenses, the grade of the actual glass, and the coatings on the individual lenses is what sets them apart.
Get over it, you're not going to win your argument, simply based on your statement that the design of the mount on the EF lenses and the design of the mount on the L lenses are the same. It's all about the
QUALITY of the end product!
You do know that this is a photography site don't you?
You've been a member since July 30, 2016, that's just over 16 months. In that time you have started only 11 discussions, none of which contain any of your own pictures.
You've responded almost 1,800 times to other topics.
Do you even take any snapshots, or are you a troll?
The quality of my photographic work stands on it's own.