A different position for your flash. Who woulda thought?
Jul 3, 2012 18:10:15 #
Jul 4, 2012 10:57:28 #
Interesting alternative. I found, however, just as I suspected while reading the story that the face of the lady seems a bit overblown.
The closer the flash is, the more brutal it gets I think.
The closer the flash is, the more brutal it gets I think.
Jul 4, 2012 12:15:34 #
Turbo wrote:
Interesting alternative. I found, however, just as I suspected while reading the story that the face of the lady seems a bit overblown.
The closer the flash is, the more brutal it gets I think.
The closer the flash is, the more brutal it gets I think.
I thought his point was that the "overblown" face was supposedly a paparazzi good thing. I just posted it for a different idea.
My personal taste is "underblown" in portraits.
Jul 4, 2012 12:19:41 #
good point, and I agree with you as far as somewhat underexposing for portraits.
The "Rembrandt" look is hard to argue with.
The "Rembrandt" look is hard to argue with.
Jul 4, 2012 13:33:01 #
They have to be kidding :shock:
Using a perfectly good hotshoe flash and cord to emulate a point & shoot built in flash???
They say the best thing for a pop-up flash ins Super Glue! :lol:
Honestly . . this has to be a joke!
Using a perfectly good hotshoe flash and cord to emulate a point & shoot built in flash???
They say the best thing for a pop-up flash ins Super Glue! :lol:
Honestly . . this has to be a joke!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.