Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Enhancing depth of focus
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Nov 3, 2017 20:50:39   #
frankraney Loc: Clovis, Ca.
 
RWR wrote:
“Stacking” will have no effect on depth of focus.


Oh, but it does. It is called focus stacking.

Reply
Nov 3, 2017 21:11:25   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
Frank, technically, it doesn't have any effect on DOF. That is a characteristic of the lens and remains constant. Focus stacking will take numerous slices of focused portions of the scene and place them together to render the scene with a larger focused area than the lens itself could render.
--Bob
frankraney wrote:
Oh, but it does. It is called focus stacking.

Reply
Nov 3, 2017 21:15:19   #
Marionsho Loc: Kansas
 
AlfredU wrote:
A tilt shift lens is probably the best way to get more things in focus on your diorama. It is the most expensive way, but gets it done in the camera. And they are just really cool lenses.


Sold.

Reply
 
 
Nov 3, 2017 21:21:51   #
RWR Loc: La Mesa, CA
 
frankraney wrote:
Oh, but it does. It is called focus stacking.

The difference between depth of field and depth of focus is explained in the link I posted on the first page.

Reply
Nov 3, 2017 21:25:32   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
rgrenaderphoto wrote:
Taaaaaaaaaaaaaa Daaaaaaaaaaaaa. It's called Focus Stacking. See Tony Northrup's video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3Dz34MMjQ0



Reply
Nov 4, 2017 11:07:26   #
frankraney Loc: Clovis, Ca.
 
RWR wrote:
The difference between depth of field and depth of focus is explained in the link I posted on the first page.


Got me. Yes they are different, but the same things controls both with one exception. That is why (I think) most of us (including me get confused sometimes) and call DOF as depth of focus....we think in terms of what is in focus from start to finish/front to back, or how deep is the focus.......Both are controlled by lens and aperture, while depth of focus can also be controlled by tilting the sensor or using a tiltable lens...

Here is another good explanation of both for anyone interested. it also has a lot of pics showing it... https://www.edmundoptics.com/resources/application-notes/imaging/depth-of-field-and-depth-of-focus/

Thanks for slapping my hand guys.......I need to learn to be more careful when using the terms. DOF is depth of field, not depth of focus. that's why we get confused sometimes...

Reply
Nov 5, 2017 07:43:35   #
Pablo8 Loc: Nottingham UK.
 
aellman wrote:
IMHO, it's a debate without a difference. The two terms refer to the same resulting characteristics of cameras and lenses.
If a non-photographer were watching you shoot a pimple on the head of a worm, with an explanation s/he might
understand the nature of your shot (or not) equally using either term. If a photographer were watching you make
the same shot, s/he would instantly know what you were up to using either term.. So you can separate the technical
meaning of these terms, but I wonder what difference it makes in real life? >Alan
IMHO, it's a debate without a difference. The two ... (show quote)


A question in my exam paper reads..."Explain Depth of Focus" If my answer was about the merits of ...' Depth of Field' ..I would have failed on that question, and possibly the whole paper. So, in 'My real life ' It made a LOT of difference............ Have a nice day.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.