Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
For Your Consideration
From the Jersey Shore
Page <prev 2 of 2
Oct 31, 2017 14:49:53   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
What fun with your bargain purchase. The atmosphere of #2 is wonderful, and I particularly love the composition: talk about leading lines! #1 is also appealing to me for the tonal range, shadows, strong geometry (a Minnie term I'm trying to learn to use correctly, lol). Well spotted.

Reply
Oct 31, 2017 20:12:49   #
ebrunner Loc: New Jersey Shore
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
What fun with your bargain purchase. The atmosphere of #2 is wonderful, and I particularly love the composition: talk about leading lines! #1 is also appealing to me for the tonal range, shadows, strong geometry (a Minnie term I'm trying to learn to use correctly, lol). Well spotted.


Thanks, Linda. I can't explain it but I'm getting addicted to ebay. All the cameras that I always lusted about thirty years or more ago are now cheap. I had a Minolta that I shot a few rolls of film with and one of the girls in my photography club at school wanted to shoot; but only had a cell phone to use. I suggested that she could learn the ins and outs of exposure and how photography really works with an old film camera. I loaned her one of mine. I have not seen any photos yet; but I'll bet it will be fun. I know it is mostly nostalgia and you can't really make an argument that film is really any better than digital. I think it gives you different results; but I don't actually think it is "better" whatever that is. There is a real joy though, for me, to use those old cameras. Not for everyone,though. They are all made out of steel and weigh a ton. Most of them are robust enough to practically drive nails with. I guess that is why they still work after almost half a century. Will our digital bodies have the same longevity? Don't know. Good to hear from you, Linda and thanks for taking a look at the photos.
Erich

Reply
Oct 31, 2017 22:58:51   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
ebrunner wrote:
Thanks, Linda. I can't explain it but I'm getting addicted to ebay. ...Erich


Robust enough to drive nails...too funny. Wonder if you'll see that written in an ad sometime on ebay? It's wonderful you're enjoying this aspect of photography so much, Erich.

Reply
 
 
Nov 1, 2017 01:54:29   #
dansmith Loc: Southwest Alberta Canada
 
Like them all Erich, especially 1 and 2. Can't get Tri X here, it was replaced with T Max some years ago and I never seemed to get it right. Ilford HP5 is very forgiving and can be pushed across town if needed. I do have problems with skies though like in flat light situations as in #2. Perhaps it is the scanner.

Great fun to be able to afford those 60's - 70's SLR's. More fun to take them out for a shoot.

Reply
Nov 1, 2017 05:39:15   #
ebrunner Loc: New Jersey Shore
 
dansmith wrote:
Like them all Erich, especially 1 and 2. Can't get Tri X here, it was replaced with T Max some years ago and I never seemed to get it right. Ilford HP5 is very forgiving and can be pushed across town if needed. I do have problems with skies though like in flat light situations as in #2. Perhaps it is the scanner.

Great fun to be able to afford those 60's - 70's SLR's. More fun to take them out for a shoot.


I tried T Max and liked it. I'm also going to tri the Ilford HP5 film. I've been experimenting with stand developing that uses a very diluted solution and 1 hour developing time with no agitation. Sound crazy, I know, but you can look it up on google and the one roll of film I've done like that so far turned out pretty nice. I used Tri-X and rodinol. If you want to buy Tri-X , you can get it at this link. It is where I buy most of my film since it is about seventy-five cents a roll cheaper than my local store that is a twenty minute drive. If you follow the link to their home page, you will see "store" as a tab on top. Then select 35mm or 120 film. They have a nice selection.

https://filmphotographyproject.com/

Erich

Reply
Nov 1, 2017 07:01:46   #
Dave Chinn
 
ebrunner wrote:
These are some shots I took with an old Nikon FM. I picked it up on ebay for about $30 or so. I slapped on a 50mm f/1.8 e series lens and it seems to work pretty well. The film is Tri-x and I tried "stand" developing. I think it works ok; but it does produce very grainy images. That can be ok; but many of these I had to do serious noise reduction. Do you like any of these?
Erich


Erich, by far for me is #2. The leading line of the walkway and lamppost/street light draws me in, while taking me on my own personal stroll. The grain/noise doesn't bother me so much with this one. It sorta has a time lapse look and feel to it. I also like #3, but the composition could have been a little different ... maybe. That is if you had room to capture the pier off center. Just my thoughts for a couple of strong images.
Dave

Reply
Nov 1, 2017 10:43:38   #
dansmith Loc: Southwest Alberta Canada
 
ebrunner wrote:
I tried T Max and liked it. I'm also going to tri the Ilford HP5 film. I've been experimenting with stand developing that uses a very diluted solution and 1 hour developing time with no agitation. Sound crazy, I know, but you can look it up on google and the one roll of film I've done like that so far turned out pretty nice. I used Tri-X and rodinol. If you want to buy Tri-X , you can get it at this link. It is where I buy most of my film since it is about seventy-five cents a roll cheaper than my local store that is a twenty minute drive. If you follow the link to their home page, you will see "store" as a tab on top. Then select 35mm or 120 film. They have a nice selection.

https://filmphotographyproject.com/

Erich
I tried T Max and liked it. I'm also going to tri... (show quote)


Thanks for the info Erich. There are very few stores here in the Calgary area that still stock film/darkroom supplies. I'm reluctant to purchase supplies on line from the US as our $ plus shipping tend to increase the costs significantly. Also, if I and others don't buy locally, the store will, as many have over the last 10 years stop stocking film etc. or go out of business completely, victims of the smartphone.

Once upon a time someone told me that 30 sec of vigorous agitation at the start of the development cycle would go a long way to eliminate the lack of contrast I was getting with T Max. Remember trying that with some success. Back then I used Microdol X almost exclusively.

Ilford and some Fuji product are still readily available around here. I found that D76 lasts well stock, even better than correctly stored ID 11.

Stand development is supposed to give more favorable grain. Store has Rodinal so may try it and see.

Reply
 
 
Nov 1, 2017 17:15:55   #
ebrunner Loc: New Jersey Shore
 
dansmith wrote:
Thanks for the info Erich. There are very few stores here in the Calgary area that still stock film/darkroom supplies. I'm reluctant to purchase supplies on line from the US as our $ plus shipping tend to increase the costs significantly. Also, if I and others don't buy locally, the store will, as many have over the last 10 years stop stocking film etc. or go out of business completely, victims of the smartphone.

Once upon a time someone told me that 30 sec of vigorous agitation at the start of the development cycle would go a long way to eliminate the lack of contrast I was getting with T Max. Remember trying that with some success. Back then I used Microdol X almost exclusively.

Ilford and some Fuji product are still readily available around here. I found that D76 lasts well stock, even better than correctly stored ID 11.

Stand development is supposed to give more favorable grain. Store has Rodinal so may try it and see.
Thanks for the info Erich. There are very few sto... (show quote)


I've been using Tri-x for a while now. I like it; but I think I should experiment with some other films. I think I might try Ilford HP5 in the 120 size for my Hasselblad. I'll probably use the stand develop method first time out. If it doesn't work so well, I'll try traditional. If you really want to get a hold of some Tri-x and you can't get it in my area, then let me know. I don't think it would be too inconvenient for me to buy some and mail it to you when it gets here. That would eliminate the hassle of Canadian Dollar conversion online. I could tell you what the price would be for me to purchase the film and ship it to you. You could reimburse me by Paypal or by check. I would not mind. Of course if Ilford and Fuji are readily available, they are also good. But the offer stands.
Erich
Erich

Reply
Nov 1, 2017 20:38:15   #
dansmith Loc: Southwest Alberta Canada
 
ebrunner wrote:
I've been using Tri-x for a while now. I like it; but I think I should experiment with some other films. I think I might try Ilford HP5 in the 120 size for my Hasselblad. I'll probably use the stand develop method first time out. If it doesn't work so well, I'll try traditional. If you really want to get a hold of some Tri-x and you can't get it in my area, then let me know. I don't think it would be too inconvenient for me to buy some and mail it to you when it gets here. That would eliminate the hassle of Canadian Dollar conversion online. I could tell you what the price would be for me to purchase the film and ship it to you. You could reimburse me by Paypal or by check. I would not mind. Of course if Ilford and Fuji are readily available, they are also good. But the offer stands.
Erich
Erich
I've been using Tri-x for a while now. I like it;... (show quote)


Kind of you to offer to do this Erich.

I have been watching the pricing of mail order US stores. B&H's prices are almost equal to our exchange and they have started offering free shipping to Canada on orders of a certain size. Getting more used to Ilford as well having shot Delta 3200 as well as HP5 and FP4 in the past month.

Reply
Nov 2, 2017 19:15:39   #
ebrunner Loc: New Jersey Shore
 
dansmith wrote:
Kind of you to offer to do this Erich.

I have been watching the pricing of mail order US stores. B&H's prices are almost equal to our exchange and they have started offering free shipping to Canada on orders of a certain size. Getting more used to Ilford as well having shot Delta 3200 as well as HP5 and FP4 in the past month.


I've never tried Delta. I'm definitely going to buy some Ilford, though.
Erich

Reply
Nov 2, 2017 20:18:16   #
dansmith Loc: Southwest Alberta Canada
 
ebrunner wrote:
I've never tried Delta. I'm definitely going to buy some Ilford, though.
Erich


Think that you won't be disappointed. Had a roll of Ilford's super high speed Delta 3200, saving it for a night shoot downtown. Got asked to shoot a friend's band in less than favorable light and wanted to use ambient light for effect. Although I have metered this stuff at 3200 with OK results, general consensus is to shoot at 1200 and develop for 2400...

(Both developed in D76 stock)

...shot on 120 rollfilm G.B. Kershaw 450.
...shot on 120 rollfilm  G.B. Kershaw 450....
(Download)

...and Ilford HP5 in a Pentax ME Super pushed ridicuolusly to 1200.
...and Ilford HP5 in a Pentax ME Super pushed ridi...
(Download)

Reply
 
 
Nov 3, 2017 16:54:56   #
ebrunner Loc: New Jersey Shore
 
dansmith wrote:
Think that you won't be disappointed. Had a roll of Ilford's super high speed Delta 3200, saving it for a night shoot downtown. Got asked to shoot a friend's band in less than favorable light and wanted to use ambient light for effect. Although I have metered this stuff at 3200 with OK results, general consensus is to shoot at 1200 and develop for 2400...

(Both developed in D76 stock)


Nice, and not very much grain.
erich

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
For Your Consideration
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.