This is different from what I see posted. What do you think?
JohnFrim
Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
Some photos of nude bodies that don't show a face stand on their own as a work of art. For some reason this one moves me to ask why you did not show her face. In that regard it is kind of in the middle for me.
But it also makes me ask a few other questions.
How old is she?
Is that her hand on the left breast?
So it does hold my attention a bit.
Sorry in advance if I offend you, but, this is a naked woman, not nude Art.
sb
Loc: Florida's East Coast
The out-of focus belly button piercing is a little distracting, as is the out-of-focus hand in the waistband on the left. One thought: A more artistic effect than her holding up her breast which sort of emphasizes the more sagging breast is to have her fold her arms under her breasts, gently lifting them up.
BboH
Loc: s of 2/21, Ellicott City, MD
I like it - think it tends to be erotic
A bit perplexing, therefore more interesting than most.
Vietnam Vet wrote:
This is different from what I see posted. What do you think?
I always like to see nude women. As far as this one goes, the subject is interesting but from an artistic point of view it leans more to the snapshot side. As for technical quality focus and lighting could be better. I don't mean to insult, just assumed you wanted honest feedback. Keep shooting and posting.
I like it enough to want to see more. It’s more real than the glamour style.
Not art photography to my taste.
Merlin1300
Loc: New England, But Now & Forever SoTX
Looks like the Navel Piercing is New - - AND infected
Why would anyone think this is art, it is just a topless woman touching herself.
Merlin1300 wrote:
Looks like the Navel Piercing is New - - AND infected
You saw that too did you !
Pink hair, stretch marks, navel jewelry--doesn't do anything for me.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.