Check out Underwater Photography Forum section of our forum.
How Do You Carry Your Spare Lenses?
Sep 13, 2017 11:03:53 #
I carry a small over the shoulder bag that accommodates two lenses. Very light and easy to carry
Sep 13, 2017 11:46:20 #
jaycoffman
Loc: San Diego
I carry my extra lens in my shoulder pack in its case. I only take one extra lens so this is pretty easy. When in transit I keep them in a camera bag but don't want to lug two bags around all day when I'm shooting. This seems to work for me.
Sep 13, 2017 14:07:20 #
ChrisT wrote:
a) In a Camera Bag b) In a Lens Bag c) In an Aluminum Case d) In my Backpack e) Don't have any
I don't. My 18-200 seems to satisfy most of my needs.
Check out Close Up Photography section of our forum.
Sep 13, 2017 16:54:39 #
Sep 13, 2017 17:52:07 #
ChrisT wrote:
a) In a Camera Bag b) In a Lens Bag c) In an Aluminum Case d) In my Backpack e) Don't have any
Wheelbarrow or furniture dolly
Sep 13, 2017 19:34:13 #
In a vest. The vest can hold a couple of lens, extra batteries, extra memory cards, lens wipes and other small items as needed.
Don
Don
Sep 13, 2017 20:54:11 #
gvarner wrote:
I carry one at most, if at all, in a case on my belt that's big enough for either lens from 10-20 wide to an 18-200 zoom and a couple in between.
I'll bet when you sit down to eat ... you do it ... v e r y - c a r e f u l l y .....
Check out Video for DSLR and Point and Shoot Cameras section of our forum.
Sep 14, 2017 11:38:53 #
wj cody
Loc: springfield illinois
ChrisT wrote:
a) In a Camera Bag b) In a Lens Bag c) In an Aluminum Case d) In my Backpack e) Don't have any
camera bag(s) - domke f1 and ape cases
Sep 14, 2017 14:59:46 #
shelty wrote:
I don't. My 18-200 seems to satisfy most of my needs.
Oh, I agree with you, there, Shelty ...
An 18-200 seems to cover most situations ....
I have several ... but I also have both an 18-250, and an 18-270 (different mounts)
Plus - several 70-300s ....
In fact, two of my cameras only have 16-135 lenses on them - and I've never had to remove either ...
Sep 14, 2017 15:01:39 #
PAR4DCR wrote:
In a vest. The vest can hold a couple of lens, extra batteries, extra memory cards, lens wipes and other small items as needed.
Don
Don
Don ... very practical ....
However, I don't see me wandering through the woods, on the mountains, with a 70-300 stuck in a pocket ....
Sep 14, 2017 18:55:11 #
ChrisT wrote:
Don ... very practical ....
However, I don't see me wandering through the woods, on the mountains, with a 70-300 stuck in a pocket ....
However, I don't see me wandering through the woods, on the mountains, with a 70-300 stuck in a pocket ....
I guess you will have to find another way. Backpack maybe???
Don
Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
Sep 14, 2017 19:06:10 #
PAR4DCR wrote:
I guess you will have to find another way. Backpack maybe???
Don
Don
My absolute preference in camera bags, is a shoulder bag ...
I've looked at many backpacks ... most seem to use an illogical setup for storing lenses - laying on the side ...
Suppose you're halfway up a mountain, and want to change lenses ...
Unzip the thing, and they all slide out at once ... doesn't seem very safe to me ...
Sep 14, 2017 19:17:11 #
jaycoffman wrote:
I carry my extra lens in my shoulder pack in its case. I only take one extra lens so this is pretty easy. When in transit I keep them in a camera bag but don't want to lug two bags around all day when I'm shooting. This seems to work for me.
Yes, Jay, I guess it would be ...
For me - with an AP-Z on the camera, I also usually take a minimum complement of additional lenses ...
A UWA-Z, a Macro, and a Tele-Zoom ...
That seems to do it, for me ... a shoulder bag with 2-3 lens pockets seems to do the trick ...
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Bridge Camera Show Case section of our forum.