Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Best AP-Z Lens for a Nikon DX Body - under $500?
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Sep 9, 2017 17:29:42   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
ChrisT wrote:
DAVEO - that comment I made - there, you see - was more directed to the forum in general ... you mentioned you have two 35 Primes, but have no use for either. Actually, I have a 35 Prime - which is also a macro. I don't use it much, as I don't have occasion to - as, apparently, you don't either. Now, then - the object of this post - is to get some feedback about the AP-Z lenses available for Nikon-mount DX cameras. I know about the 18-105, and the current replacement - the 18-140 - neither of which have gotten particularly good reviews. So, I was wondering if others have gone in a different direction, perhaps, to 3rd-party lenses - Sigmas or Tamrons ....
DAVEO - that comment I made - there, you see - was... (show quote)


You're preaching to the choir...I already re-iterated your original post, so please understand that I understand. I answered your question regarding my opinion of the 18-140. I have successfully used that lens on my D3100,D7000,D7100 and D500. I do wonder what questionable respected reviews you have been reading. It certainly wasn't DXO Mark or several other popular reviewers. Are there other good choices available? I'm sure there are, but the 18-140 used or refurb is a viable choice for your price point.

Reply
Sep 9, 2017 17:33:20   #
Chris T Loc: from England across the pond to New England
 
DAVEO - thanks ... your recommendation is duly noted. Glad you have had good luck with that lens. Happy Shooting!

Reply
Sep 9, 2017 18:53:39   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
ChrisT wrote:
DAVEO - thanks ... your recommendation is duly noted. Glad you have had good luck with that lens. Happy Shooting!



Reply
 
 
Sep 9, 2017 18:59:49   #
Chris T Loc: from England across the pond to New England
 
DAVEO ... thanks for your valuable contributions to this post ....

Reply
Sep 9, 2017 19:11:07   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
APS-Z?
A new sensor size replacing the APS-C?

Reply
Sep 9, 2017 19:13:24   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
Goofynewfie,
Is google not your friend? Try AP-Z.

Reply
Sep 9, 2017 19:21:17   #
Chris T Loc: from England across the pond to New England
 
Did I write APS-Z? .... I'm so sorry ... getting unnerved by insults ... AP-Z - for ALL PURPOSE ZOOMS .....

APS - C - for Alternate Proportion Sensor - Canon (or Compact, depending on your leaning) ....

If I combined the terms ... it was an accident ... my apologies ....

Reply
 
 
Sep 9, 2017 19:29:21   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
DaveO wrote:
Goofynewfie,
Is google not your friend? Try AP-Z.


All I find is Minolta film point and shoot cameras and... this thread.

Reply
Sep 9, 2017 19:35:40   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
GoofyNewfie wrote:
All I find is Minolta film point and shoot cameras and... this thread.


Try AP-Z lens and see if that helps.

35 to 105mm lens

Reply
Sep 9, 2017 19:36:11   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
ChrisT wrote:
Did I write APS-Z? .... I'm so sorry ... getting unnerved by insults ... AP-Z - for ALL PURPOSE ZOOMS .....

APS - C - for Alternate Proportion Sensor - Canon (or Compact, depending on your leaning) ....

If I combined the terms ... it was an accident ... my apologies ....


No worries!
It's a new acronym for me.
APS-C I thought it was this:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/APS-C


Reply
Sep 9, 2017 19:39:38   #
Chris T Loc: from England across the pond to New England
 
GoofyNewfie ... I may have been tired ... did I write that in a post last night, or today?

Reply
 
 
Sep 9, 2017 19:42:00   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
ChrisT wrote:
Did I write APS-Z? .... I'm so sorry ... getting unnerved by insults ... AP-Z - for ALL PURPOSE ZOOMS .....

APS - C - for Alternate Proportion Sensor - Canon (or Compact, depending on your leaning) ....

If I combined the terms ... it was an accident ... my apologies ....


Insults? There's only a little over a page for this thread. I see a lot of confusion and no insults.

Reply
Sep 9, 2017 19:43:44   #
Chris T Loc: from England across the pond to New England
 
DAVEO ... 35-105? ... I didn't know there was one ... there are both 24-105 and 28-105 AP-Z lenses for full-frame cameras, but most AP-Z lenses for APS-C/DX cameras start at 18 ... and go up from there ... I think AP-Z covers everything on the top end - be it 105, 135, 200, 250, 270, 300, now - 400 .... as long as it does decent WA coverage and a reasonable tele top end

Reply
Sep 9, 2017 19:46:03   #
Chris T Loc: from England across the pond to New England
 
DAVEO ... no insults on this one, that I can see ... but the one about - what is it ... I'm not sure, now ... is pretty full of them

Reply
Sep 9, 2017 19:54:56   #
GoofyNewfie Loc: Kansas City
 
ChrisT wrote:
GoofyNewfie ... I may have been tired ... did I write that in a post last night, or today?


Waking up from a nap myself.
If I were to invest in a DX camera system, for me the spec's on Nikon's new 16-80 look great. 24-120 ff equivalent focal length, f/2.8-4 , (very similar to my most used ff lens) but the reviews say it's over priced. I love my old 17-55.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.