rehess
Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
Metabones is producing a new "speed booster" - the "Q666". I would provide a link here, but because management here seems to believe in discussion without knowledge, I cannot provide a link right now without relegating this to the low traffic L&R section.
To my way of thinking, this release is kind of strange. It allows one to mount a Nikon G lens on a Pentax Q camera; the G lens makes lots of sense, but Pentax hasn't released a new "Q" in several years, and many of us who own a Q don't expect another one. The Q-7 {which I have} and the Q-S1 {most recent release} each has a 1/1.7" sensor, so this device will result in a 2.3 crop of the rated length of the lens while roughly "doubling" the speed - Metabones is bragging an f-stop of f/0.666 for a lens rated at f/1.2
rehess
Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
For those of you {probably most of you} unfamiliar with the "Q" family, here are a couple of pictures of my Q-7
standard Q-7 kit
Sigma K-mount 70-300mm lens mounted via adapter
What was that link again?
rehess
Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
rehess
Loc: South Bend, Indiana, USA
I'm not getting much of a reaction here. I really do want to know why Metabones would do such a thing, why they would put any effort at all into a product with very limited likely market {unless they were able to increase sales of the Q-S1}. A certain amount of the $489 has to cover production costs, so I don't see how they will ever cover design costs.
I could see the value of an adapter that halves your smallest f-stop. I wonder if there is a cheaper manual adapter that could do this for Nikon lenses on a Nikon DSLR. Wouldn't want any auto features, but getting the equivalent of half the depth of field would be interesting for me.
rehess wrote:
I'm not getting much of a reaction here. I really do want to know why Metabones would do such a thing, why they would put any effort at all into a product with very limited likely market {unless they were able to increase sales of the Q-S1}. A certain amount of the $489 has to cover production costs, so I don't see how they will ever cover design costs.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.