Kmgw9v wrote:
I currently shoot with a Df and an 800E. I skipped the 810.
The news of the 850 has triggered a GAS attack that I haven't felt in a while.
These are tough times.
Hey Kmgw9v,
IMHO never jump on the first generation of anything. Being in mechanical engineering & manufacturing for a living and having 38 yrs. experiance across a range of industries, first generation is one small step above tooled prototype. Most bugs have been worked out, hence ready to release but, there may be several gotchas in there. A good example that comes to mind are Tamron zooms between G1 and G2 for several of their lens lines, the current silent recall on the D750, the oily shutter blades of the D600, etcetera.
Think about it a bit before investing hard earned money, time and aggravation. Unless you're a full time photographer that can expense the initial outlay as part of your business, and your reference to tough times as one of a fixed income or something else, hold off. I hope this will be a bit of food for thought and help reduce your "GAS" attack to at least a more manageable "gas" attack. Besides, if all looks well after a few months, there's always the holiday season.
There will be specials and deals galore, if not during, shortly there after. Remember not everyone has $3,300 to drop on a camera body, add the grip, battery, battery charger and fast cards your closer to $4,000 or better. Also another good point to consider is if it's someone looking to upgrade from earlier models, or wanting to add an FX to an existing DX kit, for a high mega pixel count the prices of the D810 will come down to a more manageable expense range of a lot more people now and be more camera than they'll need or use. What I mean by that is the workflow impact after the fact has to be considered too.
The file sizes will be really large, requiring more storage, longer processing times and in some cases requiring hardware upgrades just to mention a few. Though they have their specific uses depending on how the final files/images will be used, I can't see dumbing down a 45+ mega pixel camera to 25 or 11 mega pixels if that's all the range I need. When I could have saved hundreds or more on a 20 or 24 mega pixel camera because I didn't have the hardware in post for dealing with the files. Then again, if you do have $3,300 burning a hole in your pocket, there's always glass, glass, glass.
Best regards, and remember it's not the hardware but rather who's using it. Now, grab what gear you've got and go shoot something!