Then there was ONE: News Flash: Steve Bannon is leaving the White House With all these folks either leaving and or getting "S**t Canned" --- It eventually comes down to the only one to...

ken_stern Loc: Yorba Linda, Ca

News Flash:
Steve Bannon is leaving the White House

With all these folks either leaving and or getting "S**t Canned" --- It eventually comes down to the only one to blame -------
"Is The Obvious"

Looking forward to the
"FINAL LEAVING"

James C Loc: Southern California

Me too!

kpmac Loc: Ragley, La

Get a life.

DavidPhares Loc: Chandler, Arizona

He is no doubt a wiz when it comes to running a business, where he has no checks and balances, nor a press to hold him accountable, but he does not have a clue as to how to be the President of the United States! Period. Also, very sad. Someone needs to take his tweeter away from him.

melismus Loc: Chesapeake Bay Country

No, look at the record. He was a lousy businessman, too; only succeeded by c***ting and ruthlessness.

DavidPhares wrote:

He is no doubt a wiz when it comes to running a business, where he has no checks and balances, nor a press to hold him accountable, but he does not have a clue as to how to be the President of the United States! Period. Also, very sad. Someone needs to take his tweeter away from him.

jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY

ken_stern wrote:

News Flash:
Steve Bannon is leaving the White House

With all these folks either leaving and or getting "S**t Canned" --- It eventually comes down to the only one to blame -------
"Is The Obvious"

Looking forward to the
"FINAL LEAVING"

Turnover is good. Get new ideas, a fresh perspective, public and private ridicule, become the butt of a Saturday Night Live sketch. Why in the world would anyone agree to work in this White House? They are (justly) mocked and ridiculed in public, and then they're fired.

salmander

DavidPhares wrote:

He is no doubt a wiz when it comes to running a business, where he has no checks and balances, nor a press to hold him accountable, but he does not have a clue as to how to be the President of the United States! Period. Also, very sad. Someone needs to take his tweeter away from him.

He has gone bankrupt six times. No one who is a wiz at business goes bankrupt six times. Once, maybe twice, if the circumstances were bad, but six times is a sign of failure, not success. This shows that he is really a bad businessman. He has survived these bankruptcies by stiffing his subcontractors. He used the money he should have paid them for his own extravagant needs, enabling his survival. And he has been sued 100s of times, mostly by these subcontractors. He is/was an unethical businessman. Survival is not the same as being good in business. His business history is not a reason to hold him in high regard.

His inability to run a "tight ship" as a business, carries over as President. He does not know how to gather necessary information and personnel for his P**********l duties, nor does he seem capable of thinking carefully about what he is about to do or say. That's how he doesn't know how to be a good President either.

salmander

jerryc41 wrote:

Turnover is good. Get new ideas, a fresh perspective, public and private ridicule, become the butt of a Saturday Night Live sketch. Why in the world would anyone agree to work in this White House? They are (justly) mocked and ridiculed in public, and then they're fired.

Turnover may be good if capable, experienced people are chosen to begin with, and they are able to add something positive during their tenure before being let go. Turnover is not good if the personnel are let go within a short period of time - Scaramucci lasted only nine days. This is a sign of failure in the original choices of these individuals. If turnover is common, then the original plan was ill conceived and executed. It is a sign of failure, not an acceptable process in the function of a business or governmental position.

jaymatt Loc: Alexandria, Indiana

Look at it this way: He's not perfect, but he's a refreshing leader after the terrible mess Obama got us into in the last eight years. And there's one scarier thought: The crooked Clinton witch might have been elected.

Waiting on adm to send this all to the attic, where it probably belongs.

cheineck Loc: Hobe Sound, FL

salmander wrote:

He has gone bankrupt six times. No one who is a w... (show quote)

Has anyone here considered what the alternate choice would have done?

elad Loc: Arizona

jaymatt wrote:

Look at it this way: He's not perfect, but he's a refreshing leader after the terrible mess Obama got us into in the last eight years. And there's one scarier thought: The crooked Clinton witch might have been elected.

Waiting on adm to send this all to the attic, where it probably belongs.

Amen!

dragonfist Loc: Stafford, N.Y.

He should have taken a cue from the , IMHO, greatest Republican president, Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln actually found a lot of his appointees very disagreeable but he kept them because they were very good at what they were appointed for. He put the welfare of the country above his distaste for certain individuals. President Trump I fear is quite the opposite. If you don't play butt kisser and yes man or woman you are gone.

PRETENDER Loc: Micanopy,Florida

Ass kissing is the "On The Potomac" Favorite past time.

salmander

cheineck wrote:

Has anyone here considered what the alternate choice would have done?

Nothing like the current choice. Wh**ever faults she may or may not have, she's a fully embedded part of the system, and wouldn't have been the loose cannon we now have. She would have been predictable and consistent with her policies. Wh**ever you think of her, she would've been a professional. Trump is not even a good amateur. Many of us who have zero interest and experience with politics would've done a much better job.

twowindsbear

Seems that the only thing #45, the orange buffoon, has managed to repeal and replace are members of his own staff.