The D7200 is a good camera, and by buying refurbished you are making it possible to buy a better camera for less.
david vt wrote:
A) I am seeing the refurb bodies on both Nikon website and Cameta, with Nikon being more expensive (actually same $$, but the Cameta body comes with a handful of accessories). Nikon would obviously be factory return, but the Cameta also says that it is. Any worries about difference in "factory refurb" standards between the two, or would both be "Nikon factory"?
When purchasing a refurb, it is best to deal with a "trusted vendor". That has been described as the ABC's of vendors - Adorama, B&H, Cameta! Of course there are others, but buying from one of those three will ensure getting a good product, good service, and a good return policy. I think it is safe to assume that their cameras have been inspected and refurbished by a Nikon-approved service center, but if you want to hear it from them, just call. Comparing prices and "packages" is a very good idea.
david vt wrote:
B). Cameta refurbs come with a 1 year warranty, but I cannot find what Nikon comes with (sure it is there, but may just be not seeing it. :). )
Nikon provides a 90-day warranty.
david vt wrote:
C) are the extras that cameta seems to package in (like a 32gb card and various other stuff) any good, or should I look for just a basic body and get the rest of the stuff elsewhere
The extras are designed to sweeten the deal. Nikon sets prices for their new camera gear, so probably it is the same situation for refurbished. This is how the vendors give their customers an additional "discount" on purchase. When I purchased my new camera from B&H at the sale price authorized by Nikon, the retail value of the extras was over $100.00. They even had two different "packages" to choose from! So I got the combination I liked best and was very happy. So unless the extras are things you do not want or need, it can be a very good deal!
david vt wrote:
D) I have, via a purchase from UGG member, the main lens I want - a 70-200 f2.8G AF-S FX lens, purchased specifically for my primary goal of shooting indoor BBall in average to poorly lit HS gyms, but I would also like a shorter lens as well. Some of the kits have a 18-140 f3.5-5.6G DX AF VR, which, taking into account the crop factor on the FX lens, might give me a shorter "walking around" lens to supplement the 70-200 FX with a bit of overlap while I learn the craft. Thoughts on this lens combined with the D7200 (for about $500 dollars incremental). Is there a different lens you might point me towards?
D) I have, via a purchase from UGG member, the mai... (
show quote)
You don't mention if the version of the 70-200mm has VR, which I hope it does. There are three lenses that are considered Nikon classics, and the 70-200mm f/2.8 is one of them. The other two are the 14-24mm f/2.8 and the 24-70mm f/2.8, also FX lenses. I have the 24-70mm - older version without VR - and love it. It is the workhorse of my lenses. Before purchasing the D810 [FX] I used it on my D7000 [DX], and it is a great lens on either camera - just have to keep the crop factor in mind.
Nikon is having a refurbished sale now through August 21 with 10% off. Pre-owned is also a good option, from Adorama or B&H, but make sure you know which model you want, and then make sure the one you are purchasing is the right one. Since you already have the 70-200mm, I recommend make your choice of lenses the best you can afford. f/2.8 lenses tend to be more expensive, but in general are very good. Also a lens like the 18-140mm has too much overlap of focal lengths. You would be better off with a lens like the 16-80mm VR f/2.8 DX as a walk around lens.
Go to Nikon's website and do a comparison. You will see that for basic specs, there are a lot of similarities. But the differences are what you should look at: Maximum angle of view, minimum focus distance, filter size, and focal length range. I added in focal length range because the longer that range, the less likely a lens will be sharp throughout all or most of its focal lengths.