Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Analysis
dragonfly on the wing
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Jun 29, 2012 22:24:15   #
PNagy Loc: Missouri City, Texas
 
raymondh wrote:
Good luck. Had one flying around the swimming pool one afternoon that a tried to catch with a 30D. Out of 100 shots, I only got one that was reasonably sharp.


I shot two or three of them this summer. So far I have nothing I would dare post on UHH.

Reply
Jul 8, 2012 23:07:10   #
Tripod1 Loc: Phoenix, Az.
 
I've just started to take Dragon Fly shots, wish I could get a good picture.







Reply
Jul 8, 2012 23:28:14   #
nikonesian Loc: Midwest USA
 
Tripod1 wrote:
I've just started to take Dragon Fly shots, wish I could get a good picture.


#3 looks pretty good to me. Talk about handheld!

Reply
 
 
Jul 8, 2012 23:34:00   #
Tripod1 Loc: Phoenix, Az.
 
nikonesian wrote:
Tripod1 wrote:
I've just started to take Dragon Fly shots, wish I could get a good picture.


#3 looks pretty good to me. Talk about handheld!


Yea #3 I was holding the camera in right hand and the dragon fly in the left. I volunteer at Phx Zoo in StingRay Bay the poor thing fell in the water I rescued it. It was wet salt water, held on to me for about 5 min till wings dried, I finally shook it off and it flew away.

Reply
Jul 9, 2012 12:18:34   #
glojo Loc: South Devon, England
 
iosa wrote:
Any suggestions on how I might try to bring a subject like this into sharper focus? I was handholding my camera, a Canon 7D fixed with a Tamron 70mm-300mm zoom (set to 147mm), f/7.1, ISO 640, using spot metering. The first shot was at 1/1000s, the second at 1/1250s.


Have you replied to any of the points being raised?

You submitted two pictures of dragon flies that are in flight so we should assume you are asking about that specific area of dragonfly photography??

No need to fill the view finder but a definite need to zoom further in and by crikey those things are fast..

I am not experienced in this specific skill (snapping dragon flies that are in flight) but good luck to you in your future attempst.

Instead of posting images of these insects that are static, it would be brilliant to see pictures of them in flight.. It is something I would love to try but sadly these insects have never graced me with their presence :(

Reply
Jul 14, 2012 18:40:44   #
eframgoldberg Loc: South Florida
 
If you want to capture a dragonfly in flight you have a few options. You can either use a longer focal length like around 300mm and like f5.6 to make sure you have a decent depth of field, and kick up your iso until your shutter speed is around 1/1000. It would be nice to have a close focusing telephoto. A 200mm or 180mm macro would be ideal. You might want to set your camera up on continuous shooting and see if you can get lucky enough to capture it in flight. Dragonflies are iffy, the easiest way to shoot an insect in flight is if it is hovering, and dragonflies do not hover too much.
The other option is to set up a special rig. These have trip lasers and when the dragonfly flies through the laser, it will break the signal and the camera will fire. To do this you will set up the camera, with the laser, usually a high speed flash, and make sure the delays are correct. I have no done this but Im sure you can find other people who have.
In conclusion, there is no easy way to capture a dragonfly in flight. I have taken over 50,000 macro shots the past year and I have around less then 10 shots of insects flying. Good Luck.

Here is an orchid bee in flight, these bees hover so with some patience you can capture them,
Here is an orchid bee in flight, these bees hover ...

here is a hover fly in flight, also an insect prone to hover.
here is a hover fly in flight, also an insect pron...

here is a lucky shot of a bee in flight
here is a lucky shot of a bee in flight...

here is a honey bee in flight, cropped, and taken with nikkor 28mm f2.8 ais on close focus.
here is a honey bee in flight, cropped, and taken ...

a wasp in flight
a wasp in flight...

Reply
Jul 14, 2012 18:48:38   #
groucho333
 
Great shots.

Groucho

Reply
 
 
Jul 15, 2012 00:25:19   #
glojo Loc: South Devon, England
 
eframgoldberg wrote:
I have taken over 50,000 macro shots the past year and I have around less then 10 shots of insects flying. Good Luck.


There is an old saying which states how, 'Practice makes perfect' and clearly you are well on the way to that. :thumbup:

I guess I have only taken at most a dozen shots and NONE of them in macro like your amazing examples.... Much envy





Reply
Jul 15, 2012 00:28:00   #
eframgoldberg Loc: South Florida
 
patience and perseverance can overcome any obstacle.

Reply
Jul 15, 2012 00:32:50   #
glojo Loc: South Devon, England
 
eframgoldberg wrote:
patience and perseverance can overcome any obstacle.

The funny thing was that the first image was taken at just 1/60th of a second :shock:

The second with the blurred wings at 1/4000th

Reply
Jul 15, 2012 16:05:04   #
Tripod1 Loc: Phoenix, Az.
 
eframgoldberg and glojo those are just beautiful shots, Thanks for sharing.

Reply
 
 
Jul 15, 2012 16:44:26   #
glojo Loc: South Devon, England
 
Tripod1 wrote:
eframgoldberg and glojo those are just beautiful shots, Thanks for sharing.
I personally cannot begin to imagine how efram managed to get those shots and I FULLY understand how he could have shot so many images to get those amazing results that have been achieved. Macro shots of a bee in flight is something way, way way beyond my abilities.



:lol: We can all say,

'Look this way daaarling!'

But try telling a bee to keep still whilst it is in motion. I used a macro lens but efram GOT a macro picture :thumbup: :thumbup:

I wonder if they were radio controlled top secret Area 51 gadgets :mrgreen:

Amazing shots

Reply
Jul 15, 2012 18:00:59   #
eframgoldberg Loc: South Florida
 
for all those shots I used a nikkor 50mm f2.8d which isnt a macro lens, but if you reverse mount it, the way I did, it gives around 1x which would make it technically a macro lens. The one of the honey bee flying away from a white/yellow flower was taken with the nikkor 28mm f2.8 ais mounted normal at close focus, so that would make it technically not a macro lens. Note that particular shot is cropped, which is why it maybe looks macro. The others are full size. except the hover fly which is cropped, but cropped from a macro image.

here is the original you can download
here is the original you can download...

another full size
another full size...

this is cropped from a full size, but still taken in the macro range around 1x, the bee is cleaning its tongue in flight
this is cropped from a full size, but still taken ...

Reply
Jul 15, 2012 20:19:33   #
Tripod1 Loc: Phoenix, Az.
 
Radio control you just might have something there. I'm jealous tho maybe one of these days I'd be able to get a great shot like these

Reply
Jul 16, 2012 04:29:17   #
glojo Loc: South Devon, England
 
eframgoldberg wrote:
for all those shots I used a nikkor 50mm f2.8d which isnt a macro lens, but if you reverse mount it, the way I did, it gives around 1x which would make it technically a macro lens. The one of the honey bee flying away from a white/yellow flower was taken with the nikkor 28mm f2.8 ais mounted normal at close focus, so that would make it technically not a macro lens. Note that particular shot is cropped, which is why it maybe looks macro. The others are full size. except the hover fly which is cropped, but cropped from a macro image.
for all those shots I used a nikkor 50mm f2.8d whi... (show quote)
Thanks very much indeed for the detailed explanation and who really cares if they fall within that definition of 'macro' or not, they are quite unique images.

Roughly how close do you think you were to these insects ?

You can imagine the problems I have with the 105mm lens as the field of view is very restricted and it would be very beneficial to have an extra eye like a Cyclops where I could locate a bee with the Cyclops eye and then hone in with the lens :)

I am being slightly flippant when I say how it might be easier with a wider angle lens although it is something I might consider having seen what is possible.

The 105mm lens will possibly give the detail but the detail of nothing is exactly that :) :thumbup:

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Analysis
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.