Now that I have expanded to full frame photography, I am reevaluating some of my older lenses that have not seen a lot of recent use, especially for sharpness. This test photo represents the center 20% or so of the full 36 mp image..it's a little over 7 mp. Exposed at ISO 400, f4, on-camera flash. Subject distance was about 12 feet. No PP other than cropping. Focus point was on Annie's left eye. And I know this is not a perfect photo...I'd like for the lighting to have provided a little more separation of her facial whiskers from her white coat, for example. The point is that so far, I am very pleased with the performance of my older 180 mm and 50 mm D lenses on this new body. Still have to look at the 35mm and the 300 mm f4. I think this family of lenses maybe gets a little bit forgotten. And yes...focus is slower and requires an in-camera motor, but the benefit is smaller and lighter overall design, leading to easier and quicker handling.
The cats eye ..how I like my D810 ..📷😎
I love my D810. I have used my old Nikon 300mm to shoot the red moon. While it was manual focus it did an amazing job. You will be pleased with the 300 f4. I thought mine was a f3.5 I will have to take another look.
Bob
Thanks for the comments. I do take photos of subjects other than cats. But they generally will pose attractively and (mostly) sit still. And they do not demand payment or a to sign a release for publication.
larryepage wrote:
Now that I have expanded to full frame photography, I am reevaluating some of my older lenses that have not seen a lot of recent use, especially for sharpness. This test photo represents the center 20% or so of the full 36 mp image..it's a little over 7 mp. Exposed at ISO 400, f4, on-camera flash. Subject distance was about 12 feet. No PP other than cropping. Focus point was on Annie's left eye. And I know this is not a perfect photo...I'd like for the lighting to have provided a little more separation of her facial whiskers from her white coat, for example. The point is that so far, I am very pleased with the performance of my older 180 mm and 50 mm D lenses on this new body. Still have to look at the 35mm and the 300 mm f4. I think this family of lenses maybe gets a little bit forgotten. And yes...focus is slower and requires an in-camera motor, but the benefit is smaller and lighter overall design, leading to easier and quicker handling.
Now that I have expanded to full frame photography... (
show quote)
No post processing? Is this a JPEG image?
Nicely done. I Your camera in her left eye...:-)
Yes. This is a JPEG image. Cropped in-camera only. It was a spur of the moment opportunity that arose unexpectedly. Closer examination reveals that the focus point may be a little more on the nose than the eye. I'll be doing a little more watching and controlled experimenting if necessary to make certain that the lens is not front focusing a little bit.
And THAT's why Nikon rules. My D810 meters my 35mm f/1.4 AIs and the images are top notch! My first 300mm prime was the AIs version which is still available - see the Excellent condition copy on KEH.
larryepage wrote:
Now that I have expanded to full frame photography, I am reevaluating some of my older lenses that have not seen a lot of recent use, especially for sharpness. This test photo represents the center 20% or so of the full 36 mp image..it's a little over 7 mp. Exposed at ISO 400, f4, on-camera flash. Subject distance was about 12 feet. No PP other than cropping. Focus point was on Annie's left eye. And I know this is not a perfect photo...I'd like for the lighting to have provided a little more separation of her facial whiskers from her white coat, for example. The point is that so far, I am very pleased with the performance of my older 180 mm and 50 mm D lenses on this new body. Still have to look at the 35mm and the 300 mm f4. I think this family of lenses maybe gets a little bit forgotten. And yes...focus is slower and requires an in-camera motor, but the benefit is smaller and lighter overall design, leading to easier and quicker handling.
Now that I have expanded to full frame photography... (
show quote)
Hi Larry, fantastic detail in your photo fo the kitty. Am I seeing what I think I am seeing, it looks like a strand of hair (or fur) running from the bridge of the cat's nose and ending coiled on the cat's left eye?
Garth
Tigger1--
I see what you are describing. Hadn't noticed it before...thought the part in her eye was a reflection. Interesting observation. It does seem to be something fibrous, but finer than her coat. I don't see it in her eye today, but will be on the lookout.
Thanks for looking so closely.
larryepage wrote:
Tigger1--
I see what you are describing. Hadn't noticed it before...thought the part in her eye was a reflection. Interesting observation. It does seem to be something fibrous, but finer than her coat. I don't see it in her eye today, but will be on the lookout.
Thanks for looking so closely.
My pleasure Larry. I have tried to get a good portrait picture of my cat (Tigger) and/or either one of my wife's two cats, but so far no luck. As soon as I approach any of the three they either shy away or decide it is play time and try to take on my camera as though it is a play object. Must keep trying.
Best regards,
Garth
The biggest challenge for me is to catch them looking in another direction to avoid the bright reflection from their retinas...
Larry
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.