Check out Panorama section of our forum.
Another image of Brianna
Nov 20, 2017 11:23:18 #
twr25
Loc: New Jersey
Beautiful lighting and pose ... tat on leg is distracting so I might have removed it in processing ... but this isn't about tats; it's about photography
Apr 7, 2018 13:11:15 #
Robeng wrote:
Almost every female that contacts me for a photoshoot has some kind of a tattoo.
Maybe don't hang with at biker babes
Apr 7, 2018 15:16:09 #
jaymatt wrote:
Great pose; detest the tattoos. It'll be interesting to see what this "art" looks like when they become 70+ and saggy.
I dont know why you care they woundnt let you see them anyway.
Check out Smartphone Photography section of our forum.
Apr 8, 2018 22:20:41 #
Very nice - per the other poster the hair with the muted other colors make the photo. And the young lady looks both real, down-to-earth while also almost looking like a mannequin at the same time. And a real temptress, including Eve biting the apple. <grin>
As for her ink, what a nice canvas to paint on. I always smile at those who would admire tattoos as art if they were in a framed canvas, but put them on a body and she is "a porn wannabe" - really? I agree when men or women tattoo places - neck, hands, etc - where the tattoo is the first attraction they do themself a disservice, but their body, their call. That is not the case here.
As for what they will look like at 70+ - most of us won't be around to see. Or like my two that I got in the service 50 yrs ago, you have them reinked and they still look good on my 71 yr old body, hidden away under clothing if I desire, just like this model can do.
As for her ink, what a nice canvas to paint on. I always smile at those who would admire tattoos as art if they were in a framed canvas, but put them on a body and she is "a porn wannabe" - really? I agree when men or women tattoo places - neck, hands, etc - where the tattoo is the first attraction they do themself a disservice, but their body, their call. That is not the case here.
As for what they will look like at 70+ - most of us won't be around to see. Or like my two that I got in the service 50 yrs ago, you have them reinked and they still look good on my 71 yr old body, hidden away under clothing if I desire, just like this model can do.
Apr 9, 2018 10:54:09 #
RichieC
Loc: Adirondacks
People, much too often, don't seem to use taste for tatoo's. I seen way too many that are simply awful art.... Spongebob, or zombies eating brains, badly drawn- worse than awful. But some times , if done by a real artist, even graffiti cab be beautiful. Some lovely young things with bull backs and sleeves, but the artist they chose is phenomenal, can turn them into a living works of art.
Apr 9, 2018 11:03:04 #
twr25 wrote:
Beautiful lighting and pose ... tat on leg is distracting so I might have removed it in processing ... but this isn't about tats; it's about photography
Apr 10, 2018 08:16:19 #
Check out Travel Photography - Tips and More section of our forum.
Apr 10, 2018 12:48:26 #
But this site is only a bit about sex appeal, and if you don't find an image to have that, why should we care. I suggest it's time for someone to set up a tattoo no tattoo forum cause your opinions on them don't have a hell of a lot to do with photography.
Apr 10, 2018 13:34:59 #
hookedupin2005
Loc: Northwestern New Mexico
jaymatt wrote:
Great pose; detest the tattoos. It'll be interesting to see what this "art" looks like when they become 70+ and saggy.
When they are 70+, you will be looking at the younger ones, or GONE!
Apr 10, 2018 16:10:50 #
Bill P wrote:
But this site is only a bit about sex appeal, and if you don't find an image to have that, why should we care. I suggest it's time for someone to set up a tattoo no tattoo forum cause your opinions on them don't have a hell of a lot to do with photography.
Simply a general comment. Sorry to have offended you.
Apr 10, 2018 16:42:38 #
The issue of the "subjects of the photos" in this section has been raised many times from many perspectives: old vs young; fat vs slim (or "shapely" vs fit if you are afraid to call a spade a spade); shaven vs landscaped vs full growth; enhanced vs natural breasts; tattooed vs clean skinned; etc vs etc. In most cases there is no right or wrong, it is more a matter of personal likes or dislikes.
People should be entitled to their opinions, and they should be free to express those opinions regarding ALL aspects of the image, subject included. The arguments that go along the lines of "Comments on the lighting, pose, background, exposure, etc are OK, but DO NOT comment on the model" are silly and weak, because the appropriateness of the subject is paramount to the success of the image. Chastising negative comments about tats, age and body build on a photo of a naked heavily-inked fat wrinkled old woman would be tantamount to saying that a still-life image of a dog turd is as pleasing to look at as vase with flowers.
Notwithstanding the above, a really skilled photographer could likely make a great photo with ANY of the foregoing subjects.
Sorry for my bluntness, but sometimes the "comment police" are a bit much to take.
People should be entitled to their opinions, and they should be free to express those opinions regarding ALL aspects of the image, subject included. The arguments that go along the lines of "Comments on the lighting, pose, background, exposure, etc are OK, but DO NOT comment on the model" are silly and weak, because the appropriateness of the subject is paramount to the success of the image. Chastising negative comments about tats, age and body build on a photo of a naked heavily-inked fat wrinkled old woman would be tantamount to saying that a still-life image of a dog turd is as pleasing to look at as vase with flowers.
Notwithstanding the above, a really skilled photographer could likely make a great photo with ANY of the foregoing subjects.
Sorry for my bluntness, but sometimes the "comment police" are a bit much to take.
Check out Drone Video and Photography Forum section of our forum.
Apr 10, 2018 17:51:56 #
JohnFrim wrote:
The issue of the "subjects of the photos"... (show quote)
Points well made and well taken.
Apr 10, 2018 18:00:20 #
JohnFrim wrote:
The issue of the "subjects of the photos"... (show quote)
John, to a degree I think you are correct, the subject matter cannot be fully separated from the overall "feel" of the photo. However, commentary such as "the pose is not the best for a full-figured model" is a completely different comment than "she is grotesque". I don't think anyone on this subsection is opposed to truly helpful critique of their posted photos, but the seemingly personal attacks are totally unnecessary.
Apr 10, 2018 18:09:01 #
Thurber Mingus wrote:
John, to a degree I think you are correct, the subject matter cannot be fully separated from the overall "feel" of the photo. However, commentary such as "the pose is not the best for a full-figured model" is a completely different comment than "she is grotesque". I don't think anyone on this subsection is opposed to truly helpful critique of their posted photos, but the seemingly personal attacks are totally unnecessary.
I fully agree with your comments.
I have often said that when the subject is not "perfect" (i.e., any pose, any angle will make a "great photo") it is up to the photographer to bring out the best in that subject. There are many fine examples of really wrinkled faces, and they make a certain statement. If the photographer had backed away a bit and asked the subject to undress I suspect the image would lose its purpose and impact.
So if a photographer can take a less-than-perfect-figured model and make her beautiful, that's great. But let's not dress up a poor image by referring to the subject's "inner beauty." It takes real talent to show more than the surface of the body in a photograph.
Apr 10, 2018 19:23:59 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Printers and Color Printing Forum section of our forum.