J Corley wrote:
Sometimes I just can't get a decent photo of the birds in my yard. They are never as sharp or vibrant as they are once I process them. These bird images were taken yesterday with a Canon 70D and a Canon 100-400mm lens (older version). Love the images but I know they can be better. They were both hand held (my preference), although I have two tripods. Is it me, the light or the processing. I used Lightroom and Photoshop to finish them.
Suggestions please... this is a periodic problem and it is really frustrating me.
Sometimes I just can't get a decent photo of the b... (
show quote)
I can't download the image. But if you are using a 70D, ISO 2000 or 2500 is too high. I usually set my camera to ISO 1000 and a shutter speed of 1/1000 which is plenty fast and I hand-hold a 150-600 Sigma Sport. My aperture is usually between 7.1 and 9. If the light is bad, I will do what I need to do, usually adjusting the aperture and shutter speed first, then increasing the ISO to as high as 3200, but that is fine on a D800/810. I would not suggest such high ISO on your camera.
Also, you will get better control over the outcome if you shoot raw, since you can dial in the amount of sharpening and noise reduction (and masking on the noise reduction) to fine tune the final result better than any in-camera setting.
I have lots of birds using a variety of exposure settings on my flickr pages:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/gene_lugo/[Edit] the download server was temporarily offline. I can see the image now.
The bird seems to be moving and it is slightly out of focus and slightly overexposed (about 1/2 stop to 2/3 stop).
You used ISO 2000 which is too high, 1000 would be better, and that would mean that you'd have to use a slower shutter speed. If everything is to remain equal, that would be 1/1250. BUT, you were slightly overexposed, and you had +1/3 exposure comp to add more exposure - so 1/1600 or even 1/2000 would likely be a better exposure. Aperture is fine - that lens is quite sharp at F7.1.
You also cropped the image to 10 mp, so you can't expect the same quality as you would get from an uncropped image.
I am not sure what focusing mode you used, but I would suggest single point, center sensor, and back button focusing, so that you can focus on an eye, then recompose without re-acquiring focus. That may help. Or alternately you can move your active focus point, in this case to the right to get it on the bird's eye - which you can do with either normal AF activation (half press on the shutter) or using the back button only.
When I shoot birds I determine a general setting for the worst case - white bird in full sunlight (if applicable) and use manual exposure to set a fixed ISO, shutter speed and aperture. I will then adjust on the fly based on what kind of light is falling on the bird. When I measure the exposure, I seek out the brightest thing in the scene, measure it with the camera's spot meter until the arrow is centered in the viewfinder, then I add 1 fulls stop extra exposure (shutter, aperture or combination). This is good until the light changes where I do it again. It avoids overexposure and lost highlights.