Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Analysis
Fill flash on a sunny day? Too much light? Wrong gel?
Page <prev 2 of 2
Jun 22, 2012 12:43:24   #
jeep_daddy Loc: Prescott AZ
 
Yes.
mafadecay wrote:
me being thick but does ACR stand for adobe camera raw?

Reply
Jun 22, 2012 14:36:37   #
marcomarks Loc: Ft. Myers, FL
 
KG wrote:
Today, I took some shots of us as we were passing Monte Carlo.
The pictures were taken in harsh light. So I decided to use 1/4 CTO gel for fill flash (0 FEC) and underexpose the ambient light by 2/3rd of a stop so that the background isn't blown out while the faces are properly exposed.

The pictures turned out as if they've been photoshopped.

I'm thinking that I should do one/some of these things:
- pick different gel; too warm? not warm enough?
- drop FEC by a stop
- accept that the sky/background will be blown and not underexpose the ambient light on purpose

Any suggestions on how to balance fill flash with bright background so that it doesn't look fake?
Today, I took some shots of us as we were passing ... (show quote)


I feel the second shot is excellent and the first shot's background is too dark. The people in the first shot are exposed virtually perfect in my opinion (also not too warm or cool) but the background looks like a severe thunderstorm is overhead at dusk and about to drench them which is probably not the reality of the circumstances.

Reply
Jun 22, 2012 18:01:12   #
Weddingguy Loc: British Columbia - Canada
 
I'm sure if you were shooting the scene without you in it that you would not underexpose by 2/3. I don't understand why you would think it would be necessary, or even desirable, to underexpose the background under these circumstances. Your flash exposure seems to dead on, but my preference would be to see the background with a normal exposure. Just my 2 cents

Reply
 
 
Jun 23, 2012 11:57:11   #
docrob Loc: Durango, Colorado
 
KG wrote:
Today, I took some shots of us as we were passing Monte Carlo.
The pictures were taken in harsh light. So I decided to use 1/4 CTO gel for fill flash (0 FEC) and underexpose the ambient light by 2/3rd of a stop so that the background isn't blown out while the faces are properly exposed.

The pictures turned out as if they've been photoshopped.

I'm thinking that I should do one/some of these things:
- pick different gel; too warm? not warm enough?
- drop FEC by a stop
- accept that the sky/background will be blown and not underexpose the ambient light on purpose

Any suggestions on how to balance fill flash with bright background so that it doesn't look fake?
Today, I took some shots of us as we were passing ... (show quote)


let the camera take control - trust the force

Reply
Jun 24, 2012 13:05:59   #
nikonesian Loc: Midwest USA
 
They look great. Flash is something I'd like to master.

Reply
Jul 3, 2012 14:56:00   #
nolte1964 Loc: Des Moines, Iowa
 
mafadecay wrote:
me being thick but does ACR stand for adobe camera raw?

yes

Reply
Jul 13, 2012 01:39:34   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
photoninja1 wrote:
For my taste, the "fill" is too strong, overpowering the ambient light. I prefer fill to just soften the shadows, not eliminate them. barry.lapoint shows a nice example of the technique, but it's your picture; do it your way.
I concur.

Reply
 
 
Jul 13, 2012 10:14:01   #
gordnanaimo Loc: Vancouver Island
 
I agree with the rest of the crew. I think they look great.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Analysis
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.