Dixiegirl wrote:
Sandy, I still can't see much difference in the 35 and the 50 other than maybe more of the blur effect with the 50. The park shoot was fun, but my Lensbaby shots certainly won't win any prizes. I switched between closeups and scenes. At home I use live view for almost all my Lensbaby shots with my camera on a tripod so I can really zoom in on the subject, but the park is over the river delta in direct sun, and there is too much glare on my screen to use live view. Getting something in focus there is more of a guessing game. I'll salvage them out soon to post though.
Sandy, I still can't see much difference in the 35... (
show quote)
I struggle in live view because the exposure doesn't show up properly. When it looks right, it's actually much too bright. I've done better since I started using my viewfinder. One tip I heard about adjusting your viewfinder is to look at the lcd info in the viewfinder screen and adjust until it looks sharp. As far as the 35 and 50 optics .. wish I'd skipped the 35 and bought the edge 80. But maybe I'll find a use for that 35 yet. Who knows. I love the velvet 56. In fact it's one of my most used lenses. I like it for landscape too at the smaller apertures. This is a shot with the aperture at F/8 .. I think .. or F/11. Can't remember now.
As you can see, when it's stopped down it's a tack sharp little lens. No glow ... maybe a bit at the edges. Must have been f/8.