tnste
Loc: New Westminster, BC
I have been a reader of UHH for several years and would like opinions on the camera gear for a trip to Italy that includes Rome, Florence, Tuscany and Venice. I hope to get some memorable photos and am planning to take my Canon 7D 2, 15-85 mm lens, Sigma 10-20 mm lens and Lumix FZ1000 camera, a travel tripod and polarizer filters, chargers, etc. I am looking to buy a travel tripod but not sure what to get. The two tripods I have are too heavy. I decided not to bring my 70-200 f4 lens as it is too big and heavy. I was not going to bring my 50 mm f1.4 but someone told me I should bring the 50 mm lens for sure.
My partner and I are going to Italy in September for 20 days. The tripods I am considering are the fotopro c4i, Vanguard 235 AB, and Optex black Carbon Fiber. I was also considering taking advantage of Canon's lens sale and buying a L series lens that would be a good lens for my 7D 2 (17-40, 24-70, 24-105 or a prime L lens) that I could also use if and when I get a full frame camera. Last day of the sale is today so probably will have to forgo that.
I would appreciate comments and suggestions on the equipment I am planning to take and what travel tripod I should get.
Tim
Are you travelling with a group? If so you probably won't use the tripod.
I don't see why you'd want the 50 when you have the 15-85. Positions to shoot from are often limited so the zoom is much better.
Likewise I don't see why you'd also bring the Sigma 10-20. If you need wider than the 15 take two overlapping shots and make into a panorama.
Good decision on not bringing the telephoto.
There is great virtue in minimizing the stuff you haul and need to mind on a multistop trip. Enjoy the trip vs. schlepping a bunch of hardware.
tnste
Loc: New Westminster, BC
Thank you for your input. Not travelling with a group. The 50 mm f1.4 was suggested for low light conditions as my 15-85 only opens to f3.5. We are renting a car in Tuscany and want to take some early morning shots and night shots so I will need a tripod but it has to be light but have the capacity for my Camera and lens.
How large will you be wanting to print your photographs? My son got some great photos with a p&s in Italy, so my suggestion would be to keep it simple and enjoy the trip. It you travel just for the purpose of taking photographs, that is a totally different story.
tnste wrote:
Thank you for your input. Not travelling with a group. The 50 mm f1.4 was suggested for low light conditions as my 15-85 only opens to f3.5. We are renting a car in Tuscany and want to take some early morning shots and night shots so I will need a tripod but it has to be light but have the capacity for my Camera and lens.
I have the Manfrotto graphite. While about half the weight of aluminum it isn't a travel unit. The ball head weighs more than the tripod. Manfrotto has a graphite travel tripod. Their stuff is strong and reasonably priced.
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?A=details&O=&Q=&ap=y&c3api=1876%2C%7Bcreative%7D%2C%7Bkeyword%7D&gclid=CNjD7vaE5NQCFQOUfgodbL4OMA&is=REG&m=Y&sku=1065168I lugged a tripod on a recent trip through eastern Europe, Austria, and Germany. Part of the trip was with a rental car. Never used the tripod. Likewise on previous European trips.
The reason I asked about the group is that there was no possibility of using a tripod on the part of the trip that involved group travel.
SteveR wrote:
How large will you be wanting to print your photographs? My son got some great photos with a p&s in Italy, so my suggestion would be to keep it simple and enjoy the trip. It you travel just for the purpose of taking photographs, that is a totally different story.
His FZ1000 is great for that.
TriX
Loc: Raleigh, NC
Never used or needed a tripod in Italy. All the L lenses you mentioned are excellent, but unless you're having a GAS attack, I'd just take the 18-85 and the 50 (for low light shots inside cathedrals, etc.).
I have the 17-40L, and it is an excellent lens for the $, but if I were to buy over, I might choose the 16-35L f4 IS for the extra couple hundred $ (although the sharpness is very similar). The 24-70 is a classic, and while I think the 24-105L IS is one of the better all purpose "walk around" lenses and is just right for a FF, you may not find it wide enough for a 7D2 if you like to shoot really wide. Just a few thoughts - enjoy your trip (take comfortable clothes - Italy is HOT in July!).
MtnMan wrote:
His FZ1000 is great for that.
Yes, it would be. I think a bridge camera would be great for a trip like that. That should def. make nice prints for an album. I'm not sure how well they blow up. Perhaps you do.
tnste
Loc: New Westminster, BC
TriX wrote:
Never used or needed a tripod in Italy. All the L lenses you mentioned are excellent, but unless you're having a GAS attack, I'd just take the 18-85 and the 50 (for low light shots inside cathedrals, etc.).
I have the 17-40L, and it is an excellent lens for the $, but if I were to buy over, I might choose the 16-35L f4 IS for the extra couple hundred $ (although the sharpness is very similar). The 24-70 is a classic, and while I think the 24-105L IS is one of the better all purpose "walk around" lenses and is just right for a FF, you may not find it wide enough for a 7D2 if you like to shoot really wide. Just a few thoughts - enjoy your trip (take comfortable clothes - Italy is HOT in July!).
Never used or needed a tripod in Italy. All the L ... (
show quote)
I am too late for the lens sale so decided not to get any lenses for now and just use what I have. Thanks for your opinion on the lenses. I have a 15-85. I don't believe there is a 18-85 lens.
tnste
Loc: New Westminster, BC
MtnMan wrote:
I have the Manfrotto graphite. While about half th... (
show quote)
The Beefree carbon fiber is a great tripod and if it were not so expensive I would buy it. It is over $400 in Canada. Too rich for me.
TriX
Loc: Raleigh, NC
tnste wrote:
I am too late for the lens sale so decided not to get any lenses for now and just use what I have. Thanks for your opinion on the lenses. I have a 15-85. I don't believe there is a 18-85 lens.
You'll be fine with what you have. Yes, it is a 15-85, just a typo... enjoy your trip!
DWU2
Loc: Phoenix Arizona area
tnste wrote:
I have been a reader of UHH for several years and would like opinions on the camera gear for a trip to Italy that includes Rome, Florence, Tuscany and Venice. I hope to get some memorable photos and am planning to take my Canon 7D 2, 15-85 mm lens, Sigma 10-20 mm lens and Lumix FZ1000 camera, a travel tripod and polarizer filters, chargers, etc. I am looking to buy a travel tripod but not sure what to get. The two tripods I have are too heavy. I decided not to bring my 70-200 f4 lens as it is too big and heavy. I was not going to bring my 50 mm f1.4 but someone told me I should bring the 50 mm lens for sure.
My partner and I are going to Italy in September for 20 days. The tripods I am considering are the fotopro c4i, Vanguard 235 AB, and Optex black Carbon Fiber. I was also considering taking advantage of Canon's lens sale and buying a L series lens that would be a good lens for my 7D 2 (17-40, 24-70, 24-105 or a prime L lens) that I could also use if and when I get a full frame camera. Last day of the sale is today so probably will have to forgo that.
I would appreciate comments and suggestions on the equipment I am planning to take and what travel tripod I should get.
Tim
I have been a reader of UHH for several years and ... (
show quote)
When we went to Italy, I had a Tamron 18-270 lens on my Canon DSLR. No other lenses, no tripod. In my opinion, you're taking too much gear. I think if you cut back, you'll enjoy your trip a lot more.
The 15-85 sounds just right. I brought a bag full of lenses (to my regret). I really only needed my 18-105 on my APS-C A6000. The narrow streets and alleyways in the towns and cities get dark pretty early. If you were to add a lens I would go with a fast wide or ultra wide prime. I use a Rokinon 12mm f2.0 Something like that would be great for interiors like St. Peters and for narrow canals and 'Callas' in Venice etc. I think your 1.4 50mm might be too long on a 7D
A few well intended suggestions:
Travel light - it will still be hot and crowded in September. Even so, I think a nice travel tripod is a good idea. You can't use them in most churches etc but worth bringing for night shots, panoramas, bracketing, serious selfies, etc.
Bring a USB multi-port so you can charge multiple devices from one adapter.
Unless you are a real glutton for punishment, don't plan on visiting too many museums, churches or art galleries. If you've seen a sculpture of one dead pope or virgin in ecstasy you've seen them all.
In Venice - go to the island of Burano - not Murano, the glass place. Burano is like a cross between Venice and an Irish village.
If this is a once in a lifetime trip, try to include a day or two for the Amalfi coast and/or the Cinque Terra.
In Tuscany take the old Via Chiantigiana (SR222) from Florence to Sienna for some beautiful landscapes, but don't miss San Gimignano.
The area southeast of Sienna - the Colli Senesi is full of those beautiful rolling hills with cypress lined 'S' shaped driveways - particularly SP14 between Asciano and Torrieneri. Time it for the late afternoon. Also, spectacular views from the Belvedere Walk on the south side of Pienza. I have some nice shots I took in April in these areas that I have been meaning to post. I'll try to PM you if I get them up in the next few days.
I took a meFOTO Back Packer Travel Tripod to Africa last year, in my carry on suitcase. I did use it, with a Leica V-Lux Type 114 camera. My Canon 7d Mark 2 is not much heavier and would work fine on this. I was looking for a tripod that would fit in suitcase and not weigh much and this one certainly fit the bill. Have a nice trip. Jessie
SteveR wrote:
Yes, it would be. I think a bridge camera would be great for a trip like that. That should def. make nice prints for an album. I'm not sure how well they blow up. Perhaps you do.
Not directly. I had a Lumix with a smaller sensor that was OK for snapshots. I think the FZ1000 is a so-called one inch sensor. Still on the small size but a big step over the 1/2.3 sensors found in many bridge cameras. It should make fine 8x10 prints.
My present smallest sensor camera is a Lumix Micro 4/3. It is a much larger sensor and makes fine 11/14ish prints. It is a teeny camera (GM5) that I plan to use for trips like this in the future.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.