ejrmaine Loc: South Carolina

Finally, a sensible court ruling on this vital travel ban. Huge win for Americans.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/supreme-court-allows-implementation-of-most-of-trump-travel-ban-1498487727

idaholover Loc: Nampa ID

Woohoo! MAGA!!!!!!!!! He did say we would get tired of winning!
http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/89ae8247abe8493fae24405546e9a1aa/Article_2017-06-26-US-Supreme-Court-Travel-Ban/id-95197569c86d41f18268a24a6b57ec4f

idaholover Loc: Nampa ID

Frank T Loc: New York, NY

They granted him a stay and agreed to hear the case. They haven't ruled on anything yet.

idaholover Loc: Nampa ID

We know that Frank. Did you get someone to read it to you?

EyeSawYou

Supreme Court revives parts of Trump travel ban order, agrees to hear case
AOL.COM 2 hrs ago
WASHINGTON, June 26 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday handed a victory to President Donald Trump by allowing his temporary bans on travelers from six Muslim-majority countries and all refugees to go into effect for people with no connection to the United States while agreeing to hear his appeals in the closely watched legal fight.

The court, which narrowed the scope of lower court rulings that had completely blocked his March 6 executive order, said it would hear arguments on the legality of one of Trump's signature policies in his first months as president in the court's next term, which starts in October.

The justices granted parts of his administration's emergency request to put the order into effect immediately while the legal battle continues.

The court said that the travel ban will go into effect "with respect to foreign nationals who lack any bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States."

The Supreme Court left the lower-court injunctions against the ban in place, but only with respect to the challengers to the ban themselves and others in similar circumstances, meaning they involve people in the United States who have relationships with foreign nationals abroad and whose rights might be affected if those foreigners were excluded from entry. From AOL.COM

Frank T Loc: New York, NY

Spud, You truly are a dick head.

WNYShooter Loc: WNY

Actually they did rule, they made a ruling on the
injunctions in place, that's why there is an order to stay, not to mention the dissenting opinion.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/16-1436_l6hc.pdf

idaholover Loc: Nampa ID

Thank you, coming from you that is a compliment!

drainbamage

The Supreme Court v**e was 9-0. Huge win for Trump (and America's safety!)

Leica User Loc: Western North Carolina

Oh yes, they did moron, liar. They LIFTED the injunction. You cannot even read, can you gutter trash?

Leica User Loc: Western North Carolina

A big win for Trump and America. That works on you doesn't it maggot?

drainbamage

Dems are trying so hard to find a way to minimize this tremendous victory.

Szalajj Loc: Salem, NH

As I stated on another thread, they Partially lifted the travel ban.

If the individual comes from one of the countries listed in the travel ban, and they don't have a family member sponsoring them, a wage earning job, or they aren't a student registered for classes, then that individual won't be allowed into the United States.

But a full hearing on the ban with arguments by both sides won't be held until the Supreme Court Fall Session.

WNYShooter Loc: WNY

LOL, The original EO was for a 90 day travel ban. SCOTUS won't even hear it until it's over. They could easily rule that the Citori is moot.