I'm 69 yrs old and in Robin Hood Country (Nottingham UK). Became interested in photography only a dozen or so years ago (through my brother). I used Nikon D80 / D300 /D700 and good short prime lenses until I came upon Fuji X-Series cameras (APS-C Sensor), and have used X-E1 (slow autofocus but lovely image quality) and now X-T1 (same image quality but wonderful viewfinder and ease of use) and X-Pro2 ( same image quality, better sensor and much improved focus speed). I have Fuji XF 23mm f1.4, 35mm f1.4 and 56mm f1.2 lenses. Yesterday I was in Nottingham Castle and came across a display of a dozen or so birds of prey, all tethered. Took out my X-T1 (now there's a new and improved X-T2) with the 56mm lens, the longest I have.
There aren't many Fuji X-Series users in this forum, so I just wanted to "test the water", see what you all think. These pics are heavily cropped. Was using a full frame equivalent lens of 85mm. Processed lightly in Lightroom 5.7 as the originals were shot in Raw.
Interested in your comments .......
In my opinion you have the best equipment available !
XT-2 user.
Bob
Nice sharp images. They couldn't be much clearer. Must be a great camera, and a pretty good camera operator.
I can't comment on the camera because I know nothing about it. But, since this is the critique section, I'll comment on the photo. I really like the owl. It's straight-forward. I like the one ear up, one back look. I don't understand the apparent tether. Is it on the owl or on his perch? And the blue thing at the left is definitely a distraction. It cannot be cropped out, as it's too close to the owl. Could it be cloned? I don't know. I'm not too good at these things.
I'm not sure how you slipped in two images under the radar, but I really like the second image. It has lovely separation and the background is beautifully creamy.
AzPicLady wrote:
I can't comment on the camera because I know nothing about it. But, since this is the critique section, I'll comment on the photo. I really like the owl. It's straight-forward. I like the one ear up, one back look. I don't understand the apparent tether. Is it on the owl or on his perch? And the blue thing at the left is definitely a distraction. It cannot be cropped out, as it's too close to the owl. Could it be cloned? I don't know. I'm not too good at these things.
I'm not sure how you slipped in two images under the radar, but I really like the second image. It has lovely separation and the background is beautifully creamy.
I can't comment on the camera because I know nothi... (
show quote)
Just caught that. Hopefully the OP will repost the second one for critique.
IsoBob wrote:
In my opinion you have the best equipment available !
XT-2 user.
Bob
It's certainly "good enough" for me, Bob !
AzPicLady wrote:
I can't comment on the camera because I know nothing about it. But, since this is the critique section, I'll comment on the photo. I really like the owl. It's straight-forward. I like the one ear up, one back look. I don't understand the apparent tether. Is it on the owl or on his perch? And the blue thing at the left is definitely a distraction. It cannot be cropped out, as it's too close to the owl. Could it be cloned? I don't know. I'm not too good at these things.
I'm not sure how you slipped in two images under the radar, but I really like the second image. It has lovely separation and the background is beautifully creamy.
I can't comment on the camera because I know nothi... (
show quote)
Ha, ha, dear lady ....... we're very cunning, us Brits, especially when we don't know the "rules". But, point taken, and group admin has already swooped !
'Fraid I couldn't do much about the owl's "one ear up, one back" attitude - heck I do wish these birds would listen when I tell 'em how to pose !
I did mention in my post that this was a display of birds of prey "all tethered". The two keepers would "untether" them in order to allow the onlookers to hold them on an outstretched and gloved arm.
I never even thought about that "blue things" (plastic box) behind, and I wouldn't know how to clone it in any case ...... so that's less than a perfect 10 for this pic, then, I guess !
Many thanks for taking the trouble to comment.
Oh, and Fuji X-Series are well worth "getting to know". I've switched entirely from Nikon. But that's another story ! Kind regards from the UK.
10MPlayer wrote:
Nice sharp images. They couldn't be much clearer. Must be a great camera, and a pretty good camera operator.
Thanks for your gracious comment, old chap. Great camera and lenses, you're right there ! Camera operator, whilst improving with experience, is still in "learning mode" !
Country's Mama wrote:
Just caught that. Hopefully the OP will repost the second one for critique.
Whoops ...... my story is "didn't know the rules" and I'm stickin' to it !
That second shot was just an eagle's head. Not the best to critique, I feel, as an afterthought.
I'll see what else I can find to demo Fuji image quality that you can all get your teeth into !
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.