Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Are you familiar with crop factor times aperture?
Page <<first <prev 8 of 8
Jun 7, 2017 23:03:23   #
anotherview Loc: California
 
As I understand these matters, the sensor captures only the light that reaches it as controlled by the aperture and shutter speed. This amount of captured light varies only by a change in aperture or shutter speed, or both.

This captured light may receive amplification during processing. Increasing the ISO value boosts the signal that the processor derives from the fixed amount of light. The starting quantity of light remains the same.
SS319 wrote:
Bruce, GoofyNewfie, et.al. I apologize for my outburst, but GoofyNewfie, said about three or four things that were not even close to accurate and then told me I should listen to him and absorb his knowledge.

Now, I have been wrong before (Take 1958, for example), and I don't mind being wrong. But I do expect that when someone tells me I am wrong they will have the decency to show me where I am wrong - twice in this group of postings, People have said my ray drawings are wrong yet, neither person would - or even could - prove me wrong. I can take the same ray drawings and prove to you that a EF-S lens will cause vignetting on a full frame body

In 40 years of purchasing, using, and studying lenses, I have not seen the term T-Stop; I have studied % transmission of lenses, and effective aperture value, but never paid attention to these values after I consummated the purchase of a lens. We do consider it when deciding to put a filter on the front , but with the advent of film plane metering where the camera measures light off the film plane to provide final settings, there was never a reason to attempt to adjust for the magnitude of these inefficiencies.

I truly cannot comprehend why you would relate f-stop or T-stop to image brightness. The amount of light recorded by the sensor is a function of the Aperture, the shutter speed, and the ISO of the system minus the inefficiencies due to less than 100% transmission of the lens and the construction of the lens - AND THE SIZE OF THE SENSOR - these last three we can only change with the application of money at a camera shop. The first three are all equal in their ability to control the amount of light recorded by the sensor. Why don't we call the ISO Image brightness?
Bruce, GoofyNewfie, et.al. I apologize for my outb... (show quote)

Reply
Jun 8, 2017 06:41:02   #
SS319
 
Brucej67 wrote:
if we keep shutter speed the same and ISO the same and just vary the aperture, you are decreasing or increasing the amount of light hitting the sensor, so all things being equal and just varying aperture does affect the incoming light (which is F-Stop). .


IF we keep the Shutter Speed the same and ISO the same and just vary Aperture... Aperture does affect incoming light TRUE
IF we keep the Aperture the same and ISO the same and just vary Shutter Speed... Shutter Speed does affect incoming light TRUE
IF we keep the Shutter Speed the same and Aperture the same and just vary ISO... ISO does affect incoming light TRUE

So why do we (only) call Aperture (Image Brightness)?

Reply
Jun 8, 2017 07:28:24   #
Brucej67 Loc: Cary, NC
 
Both you and UHH member "anotherview" are right. He "anotherview" is right in saying that ISO just effects the sensitivity of the sensor and has no effect on the amount of light being passed through the lens which is only affected by aperture while shutter speed (like ISO) is only affected at the camera itself and is the duration that same amount of light can hit the sensor. So the only thing that the lens does to allow light to enter the camera is the control over aperture (and this is true whether we set the aperture manually on older lenses or tell our modern camera to tell the lens what aperture to set).

You are right on total light control, but shutter speed and ISO are a function of the camera, while aperture is a function of the lens. Back in the 1960's I owned Leica M series cameras and everything was manually set, film speed (ASA or ISO film) came as a set amount depending what film you purchased (100ASA, 200ASA and so on), shutter speed was controlled at the camera by setting a dial on top of the camera and aperture was set by a dial on the lens. My point is that this has existed in photography since the first cameras only today with modern DSLR cameras we can control all three (ISO sensitivity, Shutter duration, aperture blades in the lens) from the one source on the camera. So from the lens perspective the aperture is the only control on the lens that determines the amount of light entering the camera. All three items you mentioned are important for a balance amount of light to accomplish taking a photograph so you are not wrong. I hope this long winded explanation helps clarify why aperture is refereed to image brightness.

SS319 wrote:
IF we keep the Shutter Speed the same and ISO the same and just vary Aperture... Aperture does affect incoming light TRUE
IF we keep the Aperture the same and ISO the same and just vary Shutter Speed... Shutter Speed does affect incoming light TRUE
IF we keep the Shutter Speed the same and Aperture the same and just vary ISO... ISO does affect incoming light TRUE

So why do we (only) call Aperture (Image Brightness)?
IF we keep the Shutter Speed the same and ISO th... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Jun 8, 2017 10:50:24   #
TriX Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
SS319 wrote:
IF we keep the Shutter Speed the same and ISO the same and just vary Aperture... Aperture does affect incoming light TRUE
IF we keep the Aperture the same and ISO the same and just vary Shutter Speed... Shutter Speed does affect incoming light TRUE
IF we keep the Shutter Speed the same and Aperture the same and just vary ISO... ISO does affect incoming light TRUE

So why do we (only) call Aperture (Image Brightness)?
IF we keep the Shutter Speed the same and ISO th... (show quote)


Actually, ISO doesn't affect the incoming light arriving at the sensor. It affects the electrical signal from the sensor in one or more of several ways depending on the particular camera including: amplification of the signal prior to digitizing, changing the reference voltage of the digitizer, or increasing the digitized value of the signal in SW. Not to be nit-picking, but in the interest of accuracy...

Reply
Jun 8, 2017 10:54:47   #
Brucej67 Loc: Cary, NC
 
You are right with the possibility of effecting noise.

TriX wrote:
Actually, ISO doesn't affect the incoming light arriving at the sensor. It affects the electrical signal from the sensor in one or more of several ways depending on the particular camera including: amplification of the signal prior to digitizing, changing the reference voltage of the digitizer, or increasing the digitized value of the signal in SW. Not to be nit-picking, but in the interest of accuracy...

Reply
Jun 11, 2017 00:16:06   #
anotherview Loc: California
 
Thank you for the explanation.
TriX wrote:
Actually, ISO doesn't affect the incoming light arriving at the sensor. It affects the electrical signal from the sensor in one or more of several ways depending on the particular camera including: amplification of the signal prior to digitizing, changing the reference voltage of the digitizer, or increasing the digitized value of the signal in SW. Not to be nit-picking, but in the interest of accuracy...

Reply
Page <<first <prev 8 of 8
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.