Check out Landscape Photography section of our forum.
Second lens advice.
May 31, 2017 11:17:02 #
GLKTN
Loc: TN
Thanks Bozsik. I made the choice on the camera, whether it was wise or not is well on me. I have always wanted a very nice dslr. I have 2 daughter in laws that did and do shoot child and wedding photography. One has a Nikon 7000 and is out of the business and one has a Nikon 610 and still does family and wedding shoots. I have a brother and sister in law that are heavily into travel and wildlife photrophy. They use Nikon 300 cameras. He sugested I look at the Nikon 500 along with the 750. I decided on the full frame d750. So far I use my camera fo grandkid and family and outside walkaround. I have only had it a couple weeks. Huge learning curve ahead. Been watching lots of youtube and plan on joining the Nashville camera club next month. I am in recovery from stage 4 cancer and feel it is now or never.
May 31, 2017 22:48:58 #
GLKTN wrote:
I am a newbie and just bought my first dslr, a Nik... (show quote)
If you are serious about image quality - and it would seem so with a D750, then your next logical step would be a 70-200 f4 either Nikon or Tokina ......
The Tamron is good to about 240mm then IQ drops to 300mm ( significantly)
Jun 1, 2017 06:14:59 #
GLKTN wrote:
I am a newbie and just bought my first dslr, a Nik... (show quote)
I've sold several lenses over the years because I seldom used them. My 28-300 is almost always on a camera. I'm not the type to spend $2,000 for a lens because it will get super sharp short. My 28-300mm give me results that I like. If I were a pro, or I had to produce top quality images, I could probably justify a top quality lens.
Before I buy anything, I will spend hours researching it, as you are doing here. When I decide that a product has no major flaws and gets consistently good reviews and comparisons, I'll buy it. My advice is to read all the reviews and comparisons you can find. Remember that to product is perfect, and reviewers feel obliged to point out any shortcomings they can find, no matter how insignificant. The minor "problems" mentioned in the reviews can be handled in post processing. It sounds like you want the Tamron, and you're satisfied with what you've read about it, so you have my approval. Go for it!
EDIT: In case you missed any reviews -
https://www.google.com/search?q=70-300mm+lens+comparison&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS716US717&oq=70-300mm+lens+comparison&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i65l2j0l3.5647j0j4&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Also, don't rule out used. Look at KEH.
Check out AI Artistry and Creation section of our forum.
Jun 1, 2017 06:24:40 #
Lagoonguy
Loc: New Smyrna Beach, FL
The Nikon 70-200 f/4 is a great lens that will not disappoint. Get a refurbished lens from Nikon or Cameta for around $1000. I purchased mine for $1200 on sale and the list price is $1400. The Nikon 1.4 will take you to 280 with no appreciable loss of IQ. As Imagemeister states the Tokina would be a great choice. I have the Nikon 18-300 for my D7100 and it is handy but the 70-200 blows it away in image quality. Good luck.
Jun 1, 2017 07:21:01 #
Jun 1, 2017 07:30:13 #
Are you going after wild life or walk around? For walk around I'd stick with what you have or.. trade it in or sell it for a good used or refurbished 28-300. But if you want a good wildlife lens keep what you have and when you can buy the 200-500mm lens or 80-400mm. I prefer to stick with Nikon lenses but many are happy with Sigma and Tamron. If you go with one of those then think about the 160-600mm. I'd rent lenses first. Take your time and make the best decision.
Jun 1, 2017 07:33:47 #
GLKTN wrote:
I am a newbie and just bought my first dslr, a Nik... (show quote)
If you like the quality of the 24-120, you may not be happy with the 28-300, which is not one of their best lenses for full frame cameras. It works better on DX. If you were using a Canon 28-300 L, the situation would be a bit difference, since Canon's version of that focal length is actually pretty good. You may find that for a walk around lens, the 24-120 is all you need. How often do you think you'll use a focal length beyond 120mm? Most of the less costly zooms that go to 300mm are pretty soft at 300mm, with the exception of the discontinued Sigma 100-300 F4
Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
Jun 1, 2017 07:34:17 #
MTG44 wrote:
I really enjoy my Sigma 18-300. Sharp and not to expensive.
Won't cover an FX sensor.
Jun 1, 2017 08:16:42 #
Why does everyone worry so much about shooting distance. You will find that you will get better pictures chose up than far away. Learn some of the basics of photography. The reason you do not want to carry a second lens is because of the size, and changing lenses in the field. Purchase a 50mm prime, it is small and light, easy to use, and you will find that you will use that more than the long lens. Quit playing zoom.
Jun 1, 2017 08:21:16 #
DavidPine
Loc: Fredericksburg, TX
For most everything you'll want to do the 24-120 is a terrific lens. It's and especially good walking around lens.
Jun 1, 2017 09:53:07 #
Once a lens gets past 3X or 4X, designers are forced into compromises; a "super zoom" lens may be convenient, but the cost of that convenience tends to be IQ of some sort.
Check out Landscape Photography section of our forum.
Jun 1, 2017 10:50:09 #
jackpi
Loc: Southwest Ohio
GLKTN wrote:
I am a newbie and just bought my first dslr, a Nik... (show quote)
The 24-70mm lens is generally considered a great all-purpose lens. Your kit lens covers that range and more. You didn't say what you are most interested in photographing. The 24mm end of you lens is wide enough for landscapes. Most photographers find that 90% of their general photography photos are shot around 35mm to 50mm. For outdoor sports and wildlife, you really need something in the range of 500-600mm. I don't see any advantage to you of the 70-300mm lens. I doubt you would use it more than a couple of times. In summary, use what you have and save your money for a long telephoto zoom (200-500mm or 150-600mm) or a 16-35mm.
Jun 1, 2017 10:54:18 #
Kissel vonKeister
Loc: Georgia
GLKTN wrote:
Thanks Bozsik. I made the choice on the camera, wh... (show quote)
Glad to see the word "recovery" . I wish you all the best.
Jun 1, 2017 10:55:20 #
GLKTN wrote:
I like your and SS319's comments. Solid and sensible. I definately need to have fun and practice, practice, practice to learn the art and my camers. I am not in immediate need of a new lense. I am mainly mining for information. I enjoy this forum and feel there is a treasure trove of wisdom and experience. I realize I have yet to develop a photography personality and don't intend to start buying fancy shiny add-ons. Information is power.
Smart move on your part ... start shooting with what you have ... check the focal lengths like Bob recommended and see when you might need to add. If most of your captures are at or near 24mm and you think you could use more width then go with a wide angle zoom. If you find yourself shooting at or near 120mm and would like to have more reach then a long lens is called for. I wish I knew this before I purchased my 18-300. I love the lens but not the weight (I knew that going in) as I later found out I really don't need the reach for what I shoot and would have been better served with the 18-140 lens. So, start shooting with your camera and then let us know what you decide ... six months from now. LOL!
Jun 1, 2017 10:55:23 #
GLKTN wrote:
I am a newbie and just bought my first dslr, a Nik... (show quote)
I have that same lens (24-120) and it is my favorite walk-around lens. I shoot with a D800 and D500 and it works great on both cameras. I have other lenses, but the 24 - 120 is my favorite.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Film Photography section of our forum.