Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
How big is too big?
May 20, 2017 19:29:23   #
Mark1948
 
I looked but couldn't find the answer. What is the maximum file size for posting to the Photo Gallery. I was unable to post a 25.2 MB file earlier today.

Reply
May 20, 2017 19:51:52   #
CaptainC Loc: Colorado, south of Denver
 
For posting on the web, certainly here on UHH that is WAAAAAAY too big. First of all, forget the size in MB. All you need to do is size it by pixel dimension and at a quality of oh...say...9...even 8. I think I size mine to around 1000 or 1200 pixels on the long side.

Reply
May 21, 2017 02:49:45   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
The answer is 20MB, either as a single file or the sum of multiple file attachments.

Reply
 
 
May 21, 2017 03:56:33   #
BHC Loc: Strawberry Valley, JF, USA
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
The answer is 20MB, either as a single file or the sum of multiple file attachments.

Also from http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-426-1.html

- Maximum dimensions for images are 600x800. So if you want to post a crop and be assured that it doesn't get reduced, then resize it on your end down to at most 600 pixels in width. Images with dimensions of 600x800 or less aren't modified during the upload process.

Reply
May 21, 2017 06:05:57   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
BHC wrote:
Also from http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-426-1.html

- Maximum dimensions for images are 600x800. So if you want to post a crop and be assured that it doesn't get reduced, then resize it on your end down to at most 600 pixels in width. Images with dimensions of 600x800 or less aren't modified during the upload process.


However, all of my posts are 2048 on the long side, and bigger if it is a stitched pano. As long as I say under 20 mb for all the images in a post it is not a problem. My images have not been reduced.

Reply
May 21, 2017 08:38:05   #
DavidPine Loc: Fredericksburg, TX
 
I have also settled on 2048 on the long side. It works extremely well for me.
Gene51 wrote:
However, all of my posts are 2048 on the long side, and bigger if it is a stitched pano. As long as I say under 20 mb for all the images in a post it is not a problem. My images have not been reduced.

Reply
May 21, 2017 08:40:07   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
BHC wrote:
- Maximum dimensions for images are 600x800.


That is what the thumbnail displays (it does not get cropped, regardless of original size - just compressed). If you provide a download link ("store original") folks can see larger. But, as mentioned, anything over 2500 pixels wide is likely wasted because most people aren't using larger devices to view.

Reply
 
 
May 21, 2017 13:39:09   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
That is what the thumbnail displays (it does not get cropped, regardless of original size - just compressed). If you provide a download link ("store original") folks can see larger. But, as mentioned, anything over 2500 pixels wide is likely wasted because most people aren't using larger devices to view.


Linda, if I display a 2048x1400 image on my HD monitor 91920x1280), it fills the screen and I can still zoom a little bit. But if I were using a 4k display (3840 x 2160), it would only take up only slightly more than 1/4 of the screen. A Dell P2415Q is a 24" display and 4K, while my U2413s are 24" but only standard resolution.

Reply
May 21, 2017 13:45:23   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
Gene51 wrote:
Linda, if I display a 2048x1400 image on my HD monitor 91920x1280), it fills the screen and I can still zoom a little bit. But if I were using a 4k display (3840 x 2160), it would only take up only slightly more than 1/4 of the screen. A Dell P2415Q is a 24" display and 4K, while my U2413s are 24" but only standard resolution.


It's hard to imagine that many UHH users are downloading photos posted to Photo Gallery and viewing on such high quality screens, especially when so many folks are casual viewers who only use the digest for their daily viewing pleasure (and for many of us, it's more about general impact or creativity, not pixel peeping)

For outside UHH or for when assisting someone with pp (or issues like focus or camera/lens anomalies), I can absolutely understand the value of larger files.

Reply
May 21, 2017 14:58:52   #
joer Loc: Colorado/Illinois
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
It's hard to imagine that many UHH users are downloading photos posted to Photo Gallery and viewing on such high quality screens, especially when so many folks are casual viewers who only use the digest for their daily viewing pleasure (and for many of us, it's more about general impact or creativity, not pixel peeping)

For outside UHH or for when assisting someone with pp (or issues like focus or camera/lens anomalies), I can absolutely understand the value of larger files.
It's hard to imagine that many UHH users are downl... (show quote)


I must be one of the few since I view on Dell 2715Q 4K monitor most of the time.

Reply
May 21, 2017 17:13:28   #
Mark1948
 
As always, thanks for the prompt helpful answers. :-)

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.