Raw vs jpg: Can you spot the difference?
Jul 11, 2018 15:27:25 #
Beat a dead horse with very little really usable information, but that's UHH for ya.
Jul 11, 2018 23:12:48 #
papa wrote:
Beat a dead horse with very little really usable information, but that's UHH for ya.
I strongly disagree with that derogatory assessment of the value of this site. UHH members are very generous and knowledgeable.
Mike
Aug 11, 2018 12:26:12 #
rehess wrote:
First of all, you need to realize that the raw fil... (show quote)
Actually, his photo (rmalarz) is a perfect example of the extent that jpg's can be improved w/o the need for raw. I took the original washed out photo and did a few very simple edits in ACDSee and came out with a better picture (IMO) than rmalarz did using raw. I could have spent more time on it, but it came out quite good just editing the jpg. I'm sure folks could do better than me or malarz, but for sure, the jpg was good enough to get a great rendition of whatever he saw with his eyes. Normally, I would toss his original photo, raw or jpg, but it's surprising how poor photos can be recovered, jpg or raw. Raw can sometimes do better, but 99.99% of the time, it's overkill. I'd love to show the 3 photos side by side, but they're not mine. Those with any decent editor can edit his jpg photo from the link and see for themselves what can be done with a jpg.
Jan 24, 2019 08:12:02 #
Spot the difference is a kind of problem where gamers need to locate a collection number of differences in between 2 otherwise comparable photos, whether they are illustrations or photographs that have been modified with image control.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.