Why did you feel the need to mention that the gun was just a movie prop? Who cares?
tainkc wrote:
Why did you feel the need to mention that the gun was just a movie prop? Who cares?
I do. I don't like having live weapons around.
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
I do. I don't like having live weapons around.
What I mean is that the viewer doesn't know if it is fake or not. That's all. I was just curious.
The first one is a cute photo; the second, not so much because of the snarly expression.
Nice job. Cute model. The only kind of gun control I could support.
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
...
PaulG
Loc: Western Australia
Skirting boards got to go in the first one. Second expression doesn't do it for me, sorry
Leo_B
Loc: Houston suburb
Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:
I do. I don't like having live weapons around.
Actually they aren't live, they're inanimate objects just like car keys and teapots.
Leo_B wrote:
Actually they aren't live, they're inanimate objects just like car keys and teapots.
A teapot handle burned my hand one evening, they have been banned from the house...
Like the first photo better of the two , i think its the expression
I would agree with you that you don't want a "live" firearm on set but one without any ammunition in the chamber or magazine is not a "live" one. It is a prop made from steel and plastic. But if you are not comfortable with anything other than a fake prop than that is your choice. Still not sure why you felt the need to notify us, the viewer that you are using a fake prop. It makes no difference to the photograph either way.
tainkc wrote:
Why did you feel the need to mention that the gun was just a movie prop? Who cares?
If you go by the number of inane comments a firearm elicits, you would think a lot of people.
Most of who are clueless about weapons of any kind, except a worn, blunted tongue with which they beat dead horses.
Bill
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.