As usual. you are off an a rant with partial facts, have t***hs and distortions--probably used on something you heard somewhere. Here is a link to a comprehensive study done by the NIH:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3048809/Because its long and complicated and you will probably not be able to get someone to read it to you, here is the conclusion:
"Conclusion
The medical liability system costs the nation more than $55 billion annually. This is less than some imaginative estimates put forward in the health reform debate, and it represents a small fraction of total health care spending. Yet in absolute dollars, the amount is not trivial.
Moreover, to the extent that some of these costs stem from meritless malpractice litigation, 21 they are particularly objectionable to health care providers. The psychological and political value of addressing this grievance could be considerable.
Reforms that offer the prospect of reducing these costs have modest potential to exert downward pressure on overall health spending. Reforms to the health care delivery system, such as alterations to the fee-for-service reimbursement system and the incentives it provides for overuse, probably provide greater opportunities for savings.
Some aspects of federal health reform may reduce medical liability costs. Extending health insurance coverage to the uninsured may reduce their need to file malpractice claims to rec**p medical expenses occasioned by injuries caused by malpractice.
Additionally, in states that have adopted “collateral-source offsets”—meaning that costs covered by health insurance cannot be recovered by malpractice plaintiffs—greater prevalence of health insurance will mean more frequent offsets, lower total indemnity payments, and less “double payment” of medical expenses. A farther-reaching reform that merits discussion would be to impose a federal collateral-source offset in connection with the move to universal coverage. In these respects, health reform and liability reform may have unexpected synergies in bending our cost curve down."
As usual. you are off an a rant with partial facts... (