Ruggard Outrigger 65 Back Pack
Mar 29, 2017 13:50:25 #
At 76, having spent 2 days walking 17 miles around Charleston, SC lugging my shoulder bag, I've decided that I need a back pack. The subject back pack has very good reviews, is the right price, and appears to have the space I need for my 10-20, 24-70, 105 macro, 55-300, 35 prime and 18-55, all of which I don't need to carry. I'd like to hear pros-cons from those of you have used this pack. Thanks...
Mar 30, 2017 06:47:54 #
Bunkershot wrote:
...has very good reviews...
I think you answered your own question. I have two Lowepro backpacks for photography, and each has its advantages. Nothing is perfect.
Wearing on both shoulders is much more comfortable than trying to look like a hipster and hanging it off one shoulder. Be careful of the surface when you put it down. When I take mine off in public, I try to maintain contact with it. Thieves work quickly.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4YWaloz-Duw
Mar 30, 2017 09:02:56 #
catchlight..
Loc: Wisconsin USA- Halden Norway
Just purchased the Pelican S115 as an additional comment on backpacks.
Fantastic quality and it is crush proof. I have the camera and 6 lenses (including the 70-200 Canon) nicely packed with room for a laptop, light meter and flash...still more pockets left.
Very happy with it and got it on Amazon.
http://www.pelican.com/us/en/product/durable-travel-backpacks/sport/sport-elite-camera-pack/S115/
Fantastic quality and it is crush proof. I have the camera and 6 lenses (including the 70-200 Canon) nicely packed with room for a laptop, light meter and flash...still more pockets left.
Very happy with it and got it on Amazon.
http://www.pelican.com/us/en/product/durable-travel-backpacks/sport/sport-elite-camera-pack/S115/
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.