Feisol ct-3372, ct-3472 vs Induro git 303,git304: Considering the purchase of one of these four models from these two manufacturers. Lens and camera to support are Nikon 610 w/grip and...

Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum

Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰

Feisol ct-3372, ct-3472 vs Induro git 303,git304

Page 1 of 2 next>

Mar 29, 2017 08:58:47 #

vmanc

Considering the purchase of one of these four models from these two manufacturers. Lens and camera to support are Nikon 610 w/grip and Nikon 500mm f/4, supported by a LensMaster gimbal head. Any feedback on any of these models would be very helpful.

Mar 29, 2017 09:14:34 #

jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY

vmanc wrote:

That's a lot of comparing. I always look for online reviews from people who do this type of thing all the time. I like my Vanguard tripod, so I would recommend that, but I'm sure it isn't the best one available. You have to wonder why a company would make two virtually identical products.

http://www.shopping.com/xSBS-elite-feisol-elite-ct-3372-rapid-3-section-carbon-fiber-tripod-feisol-ct-3401-tripod~PRDLT-120181702-147234006-147234831?sb=1

The Induro models are Stealth, if that matters.

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1158026-REG/induro_git304_3_grand_stealth.html
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1158039-REG/induro_git303_3_grand_stealth.html

Mar 29, 2017 09:23:14 #

cmc65

I have the ct-3372. I use a canon 7d mkii with grip, Nest gimbal and the canon 100-400 L mkii on it 990/0 of the time. I'm 69 and weigh about 120 lbs and carry this fully mounted over my shoulder for up to four miles at a time. It's in and out of the car daily,take it through the brush and set it up in the wet marsh. LOVE IT!!!!i had a lighter tripod with a center column before. Huge mistake. I was lucky to get this on sale through B&H. The only thing I would change is the number of leg sections to four instead of the three. It would b handy to be able to go a little lower. But it's not a big problem. It's very stable.

Mar 29, 2017 09:29:53 #

vmanc

Thanks for the reply. I'm leaning towards the Feisol, but can't decide between the 3 or 4 section

Mar 29, 2017 09:31:42 #

jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY

vmanc wrote:

Thanks for the reply. I'm leaning towards the Feisol, but can't decide between the 3 or 4 section

Fewer sections mean faster setup and, usually, greater stability.

Mar 29, 2017 09:36:31 #

cmc65

vmanc wrote:

Thanks for the reply. I'm leaning towards the Feisol, but can't decide between the 3 or 4 section

I chose the three because I was still reacting to my last unstable tripod. I figured fewer sections = more stable. However, I like to sit on my little swivel tri leg seat as low as I can to the water for birds and to do that now I have to splay the legs. I'm thinking that the four section would have allowed a little more leeway for that. I only travel by jeep so the folded capabilities for traveling is not a concern for me.

Mar 29, 2017 09:38:35 #

vmanc

Thanks cmc65, that's a lot of great info. It'll certainly help in making a decision.

Mar 29, 2017 10:08:35 #

WayneT Loc: Paris, TN

Here is another option try this one. I own 2 Benros and they are exceptional for the price. This particular tripod is extremely versatile and you will be saving a little money as well. It's also taller then either of the units you are looking at:

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1199083-REG/benro_gc369t_gotravel_carbon_fiber.html

Mar 29, 2017 10:41:48 #

vmanc

Thanks WayneT. Hadn't considered a Benro, but on your recommendation I'll give it a look see

Mar 29, 2017 11:44:49 #

DaveO Loc: Northeast CT

I chose the CT-3372 because for my use,it's quicker to set up than the four section. Very sturdy and I use their leveling column. Breezes,etc,have no effect and my Wimberly gimbal with a 200-500 is quite steady. It will be my last one for a while! My Manfrotto 190CXPRO3 is not designed for heavier set-ups and I only use it for longer hikes.

Mar 29, 2017 11:47:40 #

cmc65

jerryc41 wrote:

That's a lot of comparing. I always look for onli... (show quote)

Jerry. The two are not the same. One has three sections and one has four.

Mar 29, 2017 12:12:18 #

vmanc

Those are my thoughts too, Dave. But want to consider all angles. Thanks for your input.

Mar 30, 2017 08:50:17 #

mborn Loc: Massachusetts

I use an Induro stealth 3 section very sturdy

Mar 30, 2017 09:40:34 #

markinvictoria Loc: Victoria TX

I recently purchased the Induro CLT403...and have a Sirui K40X ballhead on it. I know it's way over kill for my D7100 and 200-500 combo...but I was determined to eliminate the tripod as the weak link in my setup. Haven't done a real photo shoot yet...but initial tests using live view at 500mm and tapping on legs etc. look real promising...much better than my old Manfrotto 3021BPRO. Doing a camping trip with the photo club this weekend...will see how it does in real life shooting.

Mar 30, 2017 10:49:43 #

Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)

I have the 3472 and did not see any stability disadvantage compared to the 3372. I use mine with a 600mm F4. I can pack the 3472 easier than the 3372. I have no experience with the Induro models you are looking at, but I do find them to be a bit heavier. Induro's build quality is very goos.

Page 1 of 2 next>

If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.

Main Photography Discussion

Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections

UglyHedgehog.com - Forum