SusanFromVermont wrote:
Unfortunately there is no ONE better way to deal with these situations. If you can analyze and decide what is needed, you can shoot accordingly [bracketing, correct exposure, fast shutter speed, etc.]. OR you can do what I often settle on: all of the above... I take various exposures in case I need to use HDR, I try to get the best exposure settings and shutter speeds I can, sometimes I use the same settings more than once for more choices, then go home and play with it!
If you have one image that will work well with normal editing, that is great. If you have too great a dynamic range, the HDR probably will work best. When things are in motion, and you have ghosting, you can use the Photomatix selective de-ghosting [which I just learned about here, and have to try it!]. You can also use layers instead of HDR. Used with different images taken with the same settings, you can put each image into a layer and hide and reveal the areas that have the best of each. I took a photo in which there was an American flag blowing around. It ghosted in HDR. I used a combination of layers for hiding and revealing where I could, then used cloning for the rest.
It is not always easy [at least for me] to decide in advance which way to deal with the various situations encountered. I have actually learned a lot about the capabilities in PS by experimenting to see what works the best! Time-consuming, but I enjoy the process - especially when it works...
Unfortunately there is no ONE better way to deal w... (
show quote)
I have used this type of experimentation, sometimes just because the situation overwhelmed me and I shot normal HDR, and found the motions problem too great for the usual HDR algorithms to deal with. I have not used Photomatix selective de-ghosting either, and it's certainly worth a try.