C/A correction
Mar 2, 2017 05:11:24 #
I refer to nightski's thread:- http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-444916-1.html#7487006
With nightski's enthusiastic approval member rehess threw out a challenge to me that in order to maintain credibility to my critique I should post a photo that is better than the one she put up in her above thread.
With nightski's enthusiastic approval member rehess threw out a challenge to me that in order to maintain credibility to my critique I should post a photo that is better than the one she put up in her above thread.
Mar 2, 2017 12:38:50 #
winterrose wrote:
I refer to nightski's thread:- http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-444916-1.html#7487006
With nightski's enthusiastic approval member rehess threw out a challenge to me that in order to maintain credibility to my critique I should post a photo that is better than the one she put up in her above thread.
With nightski's enthusiastic approval member rehess threw out a challenge to me that in order to maintain credibility to my critique I should post a photo that is better than the one she put up in her above thread.
Nicely done, Rob. I should have done that correction myself. It was careless of me. You were right.
Mar 2, 2017 17:56:26 #
A thread that ends in "Thank you" is always better than one that ends in "idiot"
Thank you.
Thank you.
Mar 2, 2017 19:22:51 #
rehess wrote:
A thread that ends in "Thank you" is always better than one that ends in "idiot"
Thank you.
Thank you.
Very good... I like that
Mar 3, 2017 06:19:40 #
Mar 3, 2017 10:53:22 #
RRS
Loc: Not sure
PaulG wrote:
Very good... I like that
Still waiting for that "Skin" shot! Thank You.
Mar 3, 2017 11:00:49 #
winterrose wrote:
I refer to nightski's thread:- http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-444916-1.html#7487006
With nightski's enthusiastic approval member rehess threw out a challenge to me that in order to maintain credibility to my critique I should post a photo that is better than the one she put up in her above thread.
With nightski's enthusiastic approval member rehess threw out a challenge to me that in order to maintain credibility to my critique I should post a photo that is better than the one she put up in her above thread.
Winterrose,
A definite improvement. Very Nicely Done.
Best Regards,
Tom
Mar 3, 2017 16:34:10 #
Mar 3, 2017 17:23:56 #
trc wrote:
Winterrose,
A definite improvement. Very Nicely Done.
Best Regards,
Tom
A definite improvement. Very Nicely Done.
Best Regards,
Tom
Thanks Tom, in this case the Photoshop lens correction filter did not satisfactorily correct the CA so a somewhat more detailed method was required. A bit of a tweak to the body feathers was also applied. Cheers, Rob.
Mar 3, 2017 17:43:55 #
Mar 4, 2017 00:10:18 #
winterrose wrote:
Thanks Tom, in this case the Photoshop lens correction filter did not satisfactorily correct the CA so a somewhat more detailed method was required. A bit of a tweak to the body feathers was also applied. Cheers, Rob.
Better but still some CA present. Stick with the correction filter. In this case it works perfectly. No detailed method required.
Mar 4, 2017 11:14:51 #
Nightski wrote:
Nicely done, Rob. I should have done that correction myself. It was careless of me. You were right.
Hey, Sandra,
Looks like, with touch-ups in pp, that you nailed the exposure for good highlight detail.
On a swan yet!
Good on ya!
Dave
Mar 4, 2017 21:22:58 #
Uuglypher wrote:
Hey, Sandra,
Looks like, with touch-ups in pp, that you nailed the exposure for good highlight detail.
On a swan yet!
Good on ya!
Dave
Looks like, with touch-ups in pp, that you nailed the exposure for good highlight detail.
On a swan yet!
Good on ya!
Dave
Thank you for the observation, Dave.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.